Advertisement

Comparison of Landscape and Floristic Diversity in Plain Catchments at the Level of Elementary Regions

  • Dmitry V. Zolotov
  • Dmitry V. Chernykh
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Landscape Series book series (LAEC, volume 26)

Abstract

We examine the interrelations between elementary regional landscape and floristic units (microregions) in the basins of medium-sized rivers and lakes on the example the southeast of West Siberia. In conditions of smoothness of zonal transitions and anthropogenic transformation of the territory, it is proposed to establish the differences between microregions using differential types of geosystems or geosystems-indicators, the occurrence of which is controlled by local features of the abiotic template and basin structure. Qualitative and quantitative measures of similarity were used as an additional criterion of regionalization. In case of zonal homogeneity, the types of geosystems are compared, whereas under zonal heterogeneity the types of geosystems-analogs are applied.

Floristic regionalization is based on regional- and topological-level differential and subdifferential species, which enable us to distinguish the floristic microregions. The differential regional-level species reflect the zonality of the territory, and their difference manifests itself at the border of a common areal or its parts. Topological-level differential species are associated with the peculiarities of the abiotic template and basin structure as well as with the presence of specific ecotopes within the compared microregions, which may be zonally homogeneous.

Floristic and landscape differentiation are directly related through the distribution of differential plant species within the geosystems-indicators. Nonlinearity and ambiguity of links between floristic and landscape diversity is shown based on field data.

Keywords

Differential plant species Geosystems-indicators Landscape and floristic microregions Ob plateau Altai Krai 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was carried out in the framework of State Assignment of IWEP SB RAS № 0383-2019-0004.

References

  1. Chernykh, D. V., & Zolotov, D. V. (2011). Spatial organization of landscapes of the Barnaulka river basin. Novosibirsk: SB RAS Publishers. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Hengeveld, R. (1990). Dynamic biogeography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kagansky, V. L. (2003). Basic practices and paradigms of zoning. Regional Research, 1(2), 17–30. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. Kottas, K. L. (2001). Comparative floristic diversity of Spring Creek and nine-mile prairies, Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies, 27, 31–59.Google Scholar
  5. Kozhevnikov, Y. P. (1978). On development of a new branch of phytogeography – environmental floristics. In Abstracts of VIth congress of all-union botanical society (pp. 222–223). Leningrad: Nauka. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  6. Kozhevnikov, Y. P. (1996). Vegetation cover of Northern Asia in historical perspective. St. Petersburg: World and Family-95 Publishers. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Malyshev, L. I. (1991). Some quantitative approaches to problems of comparative floristics. In P. L. Nimis & T. J. Crovello (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to phytogeography. Tasks for vegetation science (Vol. 24, pp. 15–33). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reteyum, A. Y. (2006). Research installations of landscape science. In K. N. Dyakonov (Ed.), Landscape science: Theory, methods, regional studies, practice. Proceedings of XIth international landscape conference (pp. 46–49). Moscow: MSU Publishing House. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. Rodoman, B. B. (2010). The scientific geographical cartoids (geographical schemes). Geographical Bulletin, 2(13), 88–92. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Takhtajan, A. (1986). Floristic regions of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Yurtsev, B. A. (1994). Floristic division of the Arctic. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zolotov, D. V. (2009). Checklist of the Barnaulka river basin flora. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Zolotov, D. V., & Biryukov, R. Y. (2009). Florae-isolates of burial mounds as natural-anthropogenic elements of steppe landscapes. In Problems of Botany of South Siberia and Mongolia: Proceedings of the VIIIth International scientific-practical conference (pp. 401–404). Barnaul. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. Zolotov, D. V., & Chernykh, D. V. (2015). Landscape-basin approach to the study of floristic diversity (heterogeneous catchments of steppe and forest-steppe zones of Altai Krai, Russia, as a case study). Acta Biologica Universitatis Daugavpiliensis, 15(2), 383–392.Google Scholar
  15. Zolotov, D. V., & Chernykh, D. V. (2016). Interrelation of floristic and landscape regionalization at lower hierarchical level (Ob’ plateau, Altai Krai). Bulletin of Udmurt University, series Biology and Earth. Sciences, 26(2), 35–44. (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dmitry V. Zolotov
    • 1
  • Dmitry V. Chernykh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Water and Environmental Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian BranchBarnaulRussia
  2. 2.Altai State UniversityBarnaulRussia

Personalised recommendations