Advertisement

A Market Approach to Scaling Impact

  • Urs JägerEmail author
  • Felipe Symmes
  • Guillermo Cardoza
Chapter

Abstract

A market approach to scaling argues that social entrepreneurs scale the impact of their enterprise by exchanging impact for resources. In this chapter, we explain how this approach expands the current understanding of contextual approaches to scaling social enterprises. We further explain how it contributes to the current literature on impact investment, particularly focusing on the relation between impact investors and social enterprises. Finally, we explain the three-phased approach to market-based scaling, how this differs from the popular concept of a business canvas, and how our three phased-approach can help teachers and practitioners create successful scaling strategies.

References

  1. 1.
    Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wry, T., & Haugh, T. (2018). Brace for impact: Uniting our diverse voices through a social impact frame. Journal of Business Venturing, 33, 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Posner, L., & Rosenberg, L. J. (1970). Guidelines for teaching Logical Framework concepts. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mc Mullen, J. (2018). Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy, M. J., McHugh, N., Huckfield, L., Kay, A., & Donaldson, C. (2015). “The most supportive environment in the world”? Tracing the development of an institutional ‘ecosystem’ for social enterprise. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerlin, J. A. (2010). A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining social enterprise across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanclay, F. (2001). International principles for social impact assssment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tekula, R., & Andersen, K. (2017). The role of government, nonprofit, and private facilitation of the Impact Investing Marketplace. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1). Published online 5 December 2018.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clement, J., Shipilov, A., & Galunic, C. (2018). Brokerage as a public good: The externalities of network hubs for different formal roles in creative organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 251–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutiérrez, R., Márquez, P., & Reficco, E. (2016). Configuration and development of alliance portfolios: A comparison of same-sector and cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Letts, C., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 36–44.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Donohoe, N., Leijonhufvud, C., Saltuk, Y., Bugg-Levine, A., & Brandenburg, M. (2010). Impact investments: An emerging asset class. J.P. Morgan.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McWade, W. (2012). The role for social enterprises and social investors in the development struggle. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leme, A., Fernando M., & Hornberger, K. (2014). The state of impact investing in Latin America. Bain & Company.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Achleitner, A.-K., Heinecke, A., Noble, A., Schöning, M., & Spiess-Knafl, W. (2011). Unlocking the mystery: An introduction to social investment. Innovations, 6(3), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hockerts, K., & Agrawal, A. (2018). Impact investing: Review and research agenda. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. Published online 31 January 2019.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown, J. (2006). Equity finance for social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1), 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Höchstädter, A. K., & Scheck, B. (2019). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moizer, J., & Tracey, P. (2010). Strategy making in social enterprise: The role of resource allocation and its effects on organizational sustainability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(3), 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work. California Management Review, 57, 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Powell, E. E., Hamann, R., Bitzer, V., & Baker, T. (2018). Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aschari-Lincoln, J. (2017). Determining characteristics of social organizations for their financing (Doctoral thesis). University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Austin, J. E., Gutierrez, R., Ogliastri, E., Reficco, E., & Fischer, R. M. (2006). Effective management of social enterprises: Lessons from business and civil society organizations in Ibero-America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith, B. R., Kistruck, G. M., & Cannatelli, B. (2016). The impact of moral intensity and desire for control on scaling decisions in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 677–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    André, K., & Pache, A. C. (2014). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 659–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jäger, U. (2010). Managing social business: Mission, governance, strategy, accountability. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jäger, U., & Schröer, A. (2014). Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25. Published online 3 July 2013.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bloom, P. N., & Chatterji, A. (2009). Scaling social entrepreneurial impact. California Management Review, 51(3), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bansal, K., Kim, A., & Wood, M. O. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INCAE Business School & VIVA IdeaAlajuelaCosta Rica
  2. 2.Viva IdeaSan JoséCosta Rica
  3. 3.INCAE Business SchoolAlajuelaCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations