Advertisement

The Performativity of Labour and Femininity on Mad Men

  • Maryn C. Wilkinson
Chapter

Abstract

Maryn Wilkinson contends that Mad Men affords its female characters the potential for great transformation because it conflates the performance of femininity with the performance of affective labour—all the while highlighting the ‘performative’ as the central tenet of women’s work. Using Marxist theory, she explores ways the concept of affective labour informs the representation of women in Mad Men. Through close analysis of the series’ aesthetics, characterization, and narration, she illustrates how the representation of female labour, in contrast to the male labour, is entirely ‘affective’—not only for its leading women, but also for auxiliary characters such as Rachel Menken, Megan Draper, Dawn Chambers, Trudy Campbell, and Sylvia Rosen as well. She argues that this affective labour is consistently marked as ‘performative’ in nature. The series thus conflates the performance of femininity with the performance of female affective labour.

Bibliography

  1. Hardt, Michael. 1999. Affective Labor. Boundary 2 26 (2), 89–100.Google Scholar
  2. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2001. Empire. Boston: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2004. Multitude. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Hardt, Michael, and Paolo Virno (eds.). 1996. Radical Thought in Italy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. Immaterial Labor. In Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed. Hardt and Virno, 133–147. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Marx, Karl. 2013. Capital: Volumes One and Two. Wordsworth Editions Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Mulvey, Laura. 1989. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. In Visual and Other Pleasures, 14–26. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Röttger, Kati. 2012. ‘Preface’ and ‘Introduction: Gender and Performance at Odds? How to Deal with Paradoxes, Paralysis and Provocations’. In Gender and Performance—Jaarboek voor Vrouwengeschiedenis, 1–29. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, 78–88. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Vermeulen, Timotheus, and Robin Van Den Akker. 2015. Utopia, Sort of: A Case Study in Metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica 87 (sup1): 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weeks, Kathi. 2007. Life Within and Against Work: Affective Labor, Feminist Critique, and Post-Fordist Politics. Ephemera 7 (1): 233–249.Google Scholar
  13. Zoller Seitz, Matt. 2015. How the Mad Men Pilot Predicted the Final Episodes of the Series. Vulture, May 14. Accessed March 2, 2017. http://www.vulture.com/2015/05/mad-men-pilot-predicts-the-final-episodes.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryn C. Wilkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Media and CultureUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations