Models of Technologies pp 1-32 | Cite as
Technology of Complex Activity
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
In this chapter, using the results of Belov and Novikov (Methodology of complex activity. Lenand, Moscow, 320 pp., 2018, [1]), the technology control problem for the complex activity (CA) of organizational and technical systems (OTSs) is formalized.
References
- 1.Belov M, Novikov D (2018) Methodology of complex activity. Lenand, Moscow, 320 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 2.Novikov D (2013) Theory of control in organizations. Nova Science Publishers, New York, 341 ppGoogle Scholar
- 3.Rebovich G, White B (2011) Enterprise systems engineering: advances in the theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 459 ppGoogle Scholar
- 4.Novikov A, Novikov D (2007) Methodology. Sinteg, Moscow, 668 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 5.Schwab K (2016) The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 172 ppGoogle Scholar
- 6.De Smet A, Lund S, Schaininger W (2016) Organizing for the future, McKinsey Q, Jan 2016. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/organization/organizing-for-the-future
- 7.ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 systems and software engineering—system life cycle processesGoogle Scholar
- 8.Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), v2.0.2. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
- 9.Henriques D, Martins JG, Zuliani P, Platzer A, Clarke EM (2012) Statistical model checking for Markov decision processes. In: International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST), London, pp 84–93Google Scholar
- 10.Aichernig B, Schumi R (2017) Statistical model checking meets property-based testing. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 390–400Google Scholar
- 11.Alagoz H, German R (2017) A selection method for black box regression testing with a statistically defined quality level. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 114–125Google Scholar
- 12.Ali S, Yue T (2015) U-test: evolving, modelling and testing realistic uncertain behaviours of cyber-physical systems. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Graz, pp 1–2Google Scholar
- 13.Bourque P, Fairley RE (eds) (2014) Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge, Version 3.0. IEEE Computer Society, 2014. www.swebok.org
- 14.Legay A, Delahaye B, Bensalem S (2010) Statistical model checking: an overview. In: Barringer H et al (eds) Runtime Verification. RV 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6418. Springer, Berlin, pp 122–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Patrick M, Donnelly R, Gilligan C (2017) A toolkit for testing stochastic simulations against statistical oracles. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 448–453Google Scholar
- 16.Yizhen C et al (2017) Effective online software anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2017), Santa Barbara, pp 136–146Google Scholar
- 17.Orseau L, Lattimore T, Hutter M (2013) Universal knowledge-seeking agents for stochastic environments. In: Jain S, Munos R, Stephan F, Zeugmann T (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2013. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8139, Springer, Berlin, pp 158–172Google Scholar
- 18.Stocia G, Stack B (2017) Acquired knowledge as a stochastic process. Surv Math Appl 12:65–70MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wong A, Wang Y (2003) Pattern discovery: a data driven approach to decision support. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 33(1):114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Crawford J (1944) Learning curve, ship curve, ratios, related data. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, pp 122–128Google Scholar
- 21.Henderson B (1984) The application and misapplication of the learning curve. J Bus Strategy 4:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Wright T (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3(4):122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Chui D, Wong A (1986) Synthesizing knowledge: a cluster analysis approach using event covering. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 16(2):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Leibowitz N, Baum B, Enden G, Karniel A (2010) The exponential learning equation as a function of successful trials results in sigmoid performance. J Math Psychol 54:338–340MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Thurstone L (1919) The learning curve equation. Psychol Monogr 26(3):1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Thurstone L (1930) The learning function. J Gen Psychol 3:469–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Sutton R, Barto A (2016) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 455 ppGoogle Scholar
- 28.van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RH (1996) Handbook of modern item response theory, Springer, New York, 512 ppGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shiryaev A (1973) Statistical sequential analysis: optimal stopping rules. American Mathematical Society, New York, 174 ppGoogle Scholar
- 30.Mikami S, Kakazu Y (1993) Extended stochastic reinforcement learning for the acquisition of cooperative motion plans for dynamically constrained agents. In: Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference (SMC), Le Touquet, vol 4, pp 257–262Google Scholar
- 31.Novikov D (1998) Laws of iterative learning. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences RAS, Moscow, 98 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020