Advertisement

Economic Assessment of Co-benefits of Adaptation to Climate Change

  • Christiane ReifEmail author
  • Daniel Osberghaus
Chapter
Part of the Springer Climate book series (SPCL)

Abstract

Notwithstanding any mitigation efforts, adaptation to climate change is necessary to combat climate damage. The decision to implement adaptation measures should not solely be based on their mere adaptation effect but also on their ancillary effects on other domains. The authors provide a synthesis of the literature reflecting both beneficial and harmful impacts of adaptation measures on other areas. They discuss the side effects of adaptation in five different fields: (1) mitigation, (2) ecological systems, (3) economic development, (4) decisions under uncertainty, and (5) disaster resilience. Based on this broad review, they highlight the difficulty to assess co-benefits and conflicts of adaptation due to the complex interlinkages between the domains, the remaining uncertainty, and the consideration of unquantifiable values.

Keywords

Adaptation to climate change Ancillary benefits Ancillary conflicts 

References

  1. Aakre S, Rübbelke D (2010) Adaptation to climate change in the European Union: efficiency versus equity considerations. Environ Policy Gov 20(3):159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aakre S, Banaszak I, Mechler R, Rübbelke D, Wreford A, Kalirai H (2010) Financial adaptation to disaster risk in the European Union. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(7):721–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abramovitz J, Banuri T, Girot PO, Orlando B, Schneider N, Spanger-Siegfried E, Switzer J, Hammill A (2002) Adapting to climate change: natural resource management and vulnerability reduction. Background paper to the task force on climate change, adaptation and vulnerable communities. International Institute for Sustainable Development, ManitobaGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen MR, Stott PA, Mitchell JF, Schnur R, Delworth TL (2000) Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change. Nature 407(6804):617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anda J, Golub A, Strukova E (2009) Economics of climate change under uncertainty: benefits of flexibility. Energy Policy 37(4):1345–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Chang Hum Pol Dimens 20:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedsworth L, Hanak E (2008) Preparing California for a changing climate. PPIC, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry PM, Brown S, Chen M, Kontogianni A, Rowlands O, Simpson G, Skourtos M (2015) Cross-sectoral interactions of adaptation and mitigation measures. Clim Chang 128(3-4):381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Van der Knaap WG (2009) The mitigation – adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat Int 33(3):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosello F, Carraro C, De Cian E (2013) Adaptation can help mitigation: an integrated approach to post-2012 climate policy. Environ Dev Econ 18(3):270–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bundesregierung (2011) Aktionsplan Anpassung der Deutschen Anpassungsstrategie an den Klimawandel. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/aktionsplan_anpassung_klimawandel_bf.pdf
  12. Buob S, Stephan G (2011) To mitigate or to adapt: how to confront global climate change. Eur J Polit Econ 27(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chuku CA (2010) Pursuing an integrated development and climate policy framework in Africa: options for mainstreaming. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15(1):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornes R, Sandler T (1986) The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Courtney H, Kirkland J, Viguerie P (1997) Strategy under uncertainty. In: Strategy despite uncertainty: cutting through the fog, Harvard business review, p 1746Google Scholar
  16. de Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot RS, Kuikman PJ, Reinhard S, Rötter RP, Tassone VC, Verhagen A, van Ierland EC (2009) Adapting to climate change in the Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Chang 95(1-2):23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2018) The national adaptation programme and the third strategy for climate adaptation reporting. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/727252/national-adaptation-programme-2018.pdf
  18. Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dowlatabadi H (2007) On integration of policies for climate and global change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):651–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission (2013) An EU strategy on adaptation to climate change. European Commission, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Fankhauser S (1998) The costs of adapting to climate change. Working paper global environment facility 16, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Furlow J, Smith JB, Anderson G, Breed W, Padgham J (2011) Building resilience to climate change through development assistance: USAID’s climate adaptation program. Clim Chang 108:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 62:451–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goklany IM (2007) Integrated strategies to reduce vulnerability and advance adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):755–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1-2):101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamin EM, Gurran N (2009) Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the US and Australia. Habitat Int 33(3):238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanger S, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Surminski S, Nenciu-Posner C, Lorant A, Ionescu R, Patt A (2018) Insurance, public assistance, and household flood risk reduction: a comparative study of Austria, England, and Romania. Risk Anal 38(4):680–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harlan SL, Ruddell DM (2011) Climate change and health in cities: impacts of heat and air pollution and potential co-benefits from mitigation and adaptation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(3):126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heal G, Kristrom B (2002) Uncertainty and climate change. Environ Resour Econ 22(1-2):3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RET (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 34(3):360–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingham A, Ma J, Ulph AM (2013) Can adaptation and mitigation be complements? Clim Chang 120(1-2):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor MMB, Allen SK, Boschung J, Midgley PM (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
  34. IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, White LL (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
  35. IPCC (2014b) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Minx JC, Farahani E, Kadner S, Zwickel T (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1449–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kane S, Yohe G (2000) Societal adaptation to climate variability and change: an introduction. In: Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirshen P, Ruth M, Anderson W (2008) Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of metropolitan Boston USA. Clim Chang 86(1-2):105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klein RJT, Schipper EL, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Pol 8(6):579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klein R, Sathaye J, Wilbanks T (2007) Challenges in integrating mitigation and adaptation as responses to climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):639–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunreuther H (2015) The role of insurance in reducing losses from extreme events: the need for public-private partnerships. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 40(4):741–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamond J, Penning-Rowsell E (2014) The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change. Clim Risk Manag 2:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laukkonen J, Blanco PK, Lenhart J, Keiner M, Cavric B, Kinuthia-Njenga C (2009) Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat Int 33(3):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin T, Ko C-C, Yeh H-N (2007) Applying real options in investment decisions relating to environmental pollution. Energy Policy 35(4):2426–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lowe JA, Huntingford C, Raper SCB, Jones CD, Liddicoat SK, Gohar LK (2009) How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming? Environ Res Lett 4(1):014012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Mercer J (2010) Disaster risk reduction or climate change adaptation: are we reinventing the wheel? J Int Dev 22(2):247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Moser SC (2012) Adaptation, mitigation, and their disharmonious discontents: an essay. Clim Chang 111(2):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neth H, Gigerenzer G (2015) Heuristics: tools for an uncertain world. In: Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: an interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  51. Osberghaus D, Baccianti C (2013) Adaptation to climate change in the Southern Mediterranean, a theoretical framework, a foresight analysis and three case studies, European Commission, FP7, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  52. Parry M (2009) Closing the loop between mitigation, impacts and adaptation. Clim Chang 96(1):23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Parry M, Lowe J, Hanson C (2009) Overshoot, adapt and recover. Nature 458(7242):1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pielke RA Jr (1998) Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Glob Environ Chang 8(2):159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pindyck RS (2000) Irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy. Resour Energy Econ 22(3):233–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porrini D, Schwarze R (2014) Insurance models and European climate change policies: an assessment. Eur J Law Econ 38(1):7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pramova E, Locatelli B, Brockhaus M, Fohlmeister S (2012) Ecosystem services in the national adaptation programmes of action. Clim Pol 12(4):393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prato T (2008) Accounting for risk and uncertainty in determining preferred strategies for adapting to future climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Samuelson PA (1974) Complementarity: an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. J Econ Lit 12(4):1255–1289Google Scholar
  61. Scheraga JD, Grambsch AE (1998) Risks, opportunities and adaptation to climate change. Clim Res 11(1):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shively D (2017) Flood risk management in the USA: implications of national flood insurance program changes for social justice. Reg Environ Chang 17(8):2323–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spencer B, Lawler J, Lowe C, Thompson L, Hinckley T, Kim SH, Voss J (2017) Case studies in co-benefits approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation. J Environ Plan Manag 60(4):647–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spires M, Shackleton S, Cundill G (2014) Barriers to implementing planned community-based adaptation in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Clim Dev 6(3):277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stadelmann M, Michaelowa A, Butzengeiger-Geiyer S, Köhler M (2015) Universal metrics to compare the effectiveness of climate change adaptation projects. Handb Clim Chang Adapt:2143–2160Google Scholar
  66. Taylor A, Downing J, Hassan B, Denton F, Downing TE (2007) Supplementary material to chapter 18: Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Tol RSJ (2005) Adaptation and mitigation: trade-offs in substance and methods. Environ Sci Policy 8(6):572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner RK, Daily GC (2008) The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ Resour Econ 39(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van den Bergh JCJM (2010) Safe climate policy is affordable—12 reasons. Clim Chang 101(3–4):339–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Voskamp IM, van de Ven FHM (2015) Planning support system for climate adaptation: composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events. Build Environ 83:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walsh CL, Dawson RJ, Hall JW, Barr SL, Batty M, Bristow AL, Carney S, Dagoumas AS, Ford AC, Harpham C, Tight MR, Watters H, Zanni AM (2011) Assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation in cities. Proc Inst Civ Eng Urban Des Plann 164(2):75–84Google Scholar
  72. Warren R (2011) The role of interactions in a world implementing adaptation and mitigation solutions to climate change. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1934):217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Watkiss P, Benzie M, Klein RJT (2015) The complementarity and comparability of climate change adaptation and mitigation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6(6):541–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weitzman ML (2009) Some basic economics of extreme climate change. In: Touffut J-P (ed) Changing climate, changing economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northhampton, MAGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilbanks TJ, Leiby P, Perlack R, Ensminger JT, Wright SB (2007) Toward an integrated analysis of mitigation and adaptation: some preliminary findings. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):713–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yohe G, Strzepek K (2007) Adaptation and mitigation as complementary tools for reducing the risk of climate impacts. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(5):727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao C, Yan Y, Wang C, Tang M, Wu G, Ding D, Song Y (2018) Adaptation and mitigation for combating climate change–from single to joint. Ecosyst Health and Sustain 4(4):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Economics of Materials (CEM)HalleGermany
  2. 2.ZEW – Leibniz Centre for European Economic ResearchMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations