Two Procedures Based on Ratings

  • Adiel Teixeira de AlmeidaEmail author
  • Danielle Costa Morais
  • Hannu Nurmi
Part of the Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation book series (AGDN, volume 9)


While most social choice results pertain to ranking environments where the individuals submit their preference relations (and these only) to the balloting procedure, there are procedures that require a slightly different kind of input from the voters. We discuss two such systems: the majority judgment and the range voting. These are relatively recent entrants in the social choice field. As all procedures they have their advantages and disadvantages, but deserve attention is some decision situations.


  1. Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press (1st edn. 1951).Google Scholar
  2. Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2007). Theory of measuring, electing and ranking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 104, 8720–8725.Google Scholar
  3. Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2010). Majority judgment. Measuring, ranking, and electing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Felsenthal, D., & Machover, M. (2008). The majority judgment voting procedure: A critical evaluation. Homo Œconomicus, 25, 319–334.Google Scholar
  5. Felsenthal, D., & Nurmi, H. (2016). Two types of participation failure under nine voting procedures in variable electorates. Public Choice, 168, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hillinger, C. (2005). The case for utilitarian voting. Homo Œconomicus, 22, 295–321.Google Scholar
  7. Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)RecifeBrazil
  2. 2.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations