Advertisement

ArCo: The Italian Cultural Heritage Knowledge Graph

  • Valentina Anita CarrieroEmail author
  • Aldo Gangemi
  • Maria Letizia Mancinelli
  • Ludovica Marinucci
  • Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
  • Valentina Presutti
  • Chiara Veninata
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11779)

Abstract

ArCo is the Italian Cultural Heritage knowledge graph, consisting of a network of seven vocabularies and 169 million triples about 820 thousand cultural entities. It is distributed jointly with a SPARQL endpoint, a software for converting catalogue records to RDF, and a rich suite of documentation material (testing, evaluation, how-to, examples, etc.). ArCo is based on the official General Catalogue of the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities (MiBAC) - and its associated encoding regulations - which collects and validates the catalogue records of (ideally) all Italian Cultural Heritage properties (excluding libraries and archives), contributed by CH administrators from all over Italy. We present its structure, design methods and tools, its growing community, and delineate its importance, quality, and impact.

References

  1. 1.
    van Aart, C., Wielinga, B., van Hage, W.R.: Mobile cultural heritage guide: location-aware semantic search. In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6317, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atencia, M., et al.: Data interlinking through robust linkkey extraction. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 15–20. IOS Press (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomqvist, E., et al.: Experiments on pattern-based ontology design. In: K-CAP 2009. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blomqvist, E., Presutti, V., Daga, E., Gangemi, A.: Experimenting with eXtreme design. In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6317, pp. 120–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blomqvist, E., Seil Sepour, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology testing - methodology and tool. In: ten Teije, A., et al. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7603, pp. 216–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Boer, V., et al.: Amsterdam museum linked open data. Semant. Web 4(3), 237–243 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonatti, P.A., et al.: Knowledge graphs: new directions for knowledge representation on the semantic web (Dagstuhl Seminar 18371). Dagstuhl Rep. 8(9), 29–111 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daquino, M., et al.: Enhancing semantic expressivity in the cultural heritage domain: exposing the Zeri photo archive as linked open data. JOCCH 10(4), 21:1–21:21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dijkshoorn, C., et al.: Modeling cultural heritage data for online publication. Appl. Ontol. 13(4), 255–271 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag. 24(3), 75–92 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J.: Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 140–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hitzler, P., et al. (eds.): Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns - Foundations and Applications. Studies on the Semantic Web, vol. 25. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hitzler, P., et al.: Towards a simple but useful ontology design pattern representation language. In: Proceedings of WOP 2017, Vienna, Austria (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hyvönen, E.: Semantic portals for cultural heritage. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 757–778. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isaac, A., et al.: Europeana linked open data - data.europeana.eu. Semant. Web 4(3), 291–297 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kilgarriff, A., et al.: ITRI-04-08 the sketch engine. Inf. Technol. 105, 116 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lodi, G., et al.: Semantic web for cultural heritage valorisation. In: Hai-Jew, S. (ed.) Data Analytics in Digital Humanities. MSA, pp. 3–37. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54499-1_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Presutti, V., Lodi, G., Nuzzolese, A., Gangemi, A., Peroni, S., Asprino, L.: The role of ontology design patterns in linked data projects. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 113–121. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szekely, P., et al.: Connecting the smithsonian american art museum to the linked data cloud. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 593–607. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Volz, J., et al.: Silk-a link discovery framework for the web of data. In: LDOW 2009, vol. 538. CEUR-ws (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Anita Carriero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aldo Gangemi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria Letizia Mancinelli
    • 3
  • Ludovica Marinucci
    • 1
  • Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
    • 1
  • Valentina Presutti
    • 1
  • Chiara Veninata
    • 3
  1. 1.STLabISTC-CNRRomeItaly
  2. 2.FICLITUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.ICCDMiBACRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations