Advertisement

Creating Societal Trust Through Communication to Legitimize Social Entrepreneurship in Russia

  • Yulia ArayEmail author
  • Anastasia Petrova-Savchenko
Chapter

Abstract

Social entrepreneurs who set themselves both social and economic goals are the actors who may try to create and develop new business models in the areas of state and market failures. Trust plays a crucial role in this concept. People mostly judge social entrepreneurs by their intentions instead of judging by the social effects brought by their entrepreneurial activities. This is a very relevant challenge, as Social Entrepreneurs are usually characterized by a higher level of trust that comes from the different goals they have in finding solutions for society. This contribution about Creating Societal Trust through Communication to Legitimize Social Entrepreneurship in Russia is a role-model concept.

References

  1. Aldrich H (2000) Entrepreneurial strategies in new organizational populations. In: Swedberg R (ed) Entrepreneurship: the social science view. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 211–228Google Scholar
  2. Alegre I (2015) Social and economic tension in social enterprises: does it exist? Soc Bus 5(1):17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1362/204440815X14267607784767Google Scholar
  3. Anderson AR, Jack SL (2002) The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: a glue ora lubricant? Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 14:193–210Google Scholar
  4. Aray Y, Petrova-Savchenko A (2018) Social entrepreneurship in Russia: current trends and opportunities for development. In: Proceedings of GSOM emerging markets conference. St. Petersburg University Graduate School of Management, pp 60–61Google Scholar
  5. Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different or both? Entrepreneurship Theor Pract 30(1):1–22Google Scholar
  6. Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrids organizing—insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad Manage Ann 8(1):397–441Google Scholar
  7. Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A-C, Model J (2015) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: the case of work integration social enterprises. Acad Manage J 58(6):1658–1685Google Scholar
  8. Blagov Y, Aray Y (2016) Developing social entrepreneurship models in Russian legal and socio-economic context. In: Proceedings of GSOM emerging markets conference. St. Petersburg University Graduate School of Management, pp 49–51Google Scholar
  9. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:95–120Google Scholar
  10. Cornforth C (2014) Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Soc Enterp J 10(1):3–20Google Scholar
  11. Costanzo LA, Vurro C, Foster D, Servato F, Perrini F (2014) Dual-mission management in social entrepreneurship: qualitative evidence from social firms in the United Kingdom. J Small Bus Manage 52(4):655–677Google Scholar
  12. Dart R (2004) The legitimacy of social enterprise nonprofit. Manage Leadersh 14(4):411–424Google Scholar
  13. Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J (2014) The governance of social enterprises: mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res Organ Behav 34:81–100Google Scholar
  14. Emerson J (2003) Where money meets mission: breaking down the firewalls between foundation investments and programming. Stanford Soc Innov Rev. Available at: www.blendedvalue.org/wp-content/uploads/2004/02/pdf-money-meets-mission.pdf
  15. Gambetta DG (ed) (1988) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Grenier P (2006) Social entrepreneurship: agency in a globalizing world. In: Nicholls A (ed) Social entrepreneurship. New models of sustainable social change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1986) Where do organizations come from? Sociol Forum 1(1):50–72Google Scholar
  18. Helmke G, Levitsky S (2004) Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspect Politics 2(04):725–740Google Scholar
  19. Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and post-modernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Jäger UP, Beyes T (2009) Strategizing in NPOs: a case study on the practice of organizational change between social mission and economic rationale. Voluntas 21:82–100Google Scholar
  21. Lallemand-Stempak N (2015) Rôle de la planification stratégique dans l’évolution des entreprises sociales. Revue française de gestion 247:101–117Google Scholar
  22. Liao J, Welsch H (2005) Roles of social capital in venture creation: key dimensions and research implications. J Small Bus Manage 43(4):345–362Google Scholar
  23. Lucas JW, Lovaglia MJ (2015) Legitimation and institutionalization as trust-building: reducing resistance to power and influence in organizations. Adv Group Processes 23:229–252Google Scholar
  24. Maier F, Meyer M, Steinbereithner M (2016) Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: a systematic review. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Q 45(1):64–86Google Scholar
  25. Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J World Bus 41(1):6–44Google Scholar
  26. Mair J, Battilana J, Cardenas J (2012) Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. J Bus Ethics 111(3):353–373Google Scholar
  27. Mongelli L, Rullani F, Versari P (2013) Hybridization of diverging institutional logics through the ‘common tone’: the case of social entrepreneurship. In: EMES-SOCENT conference selected papers, no. LG13-46, Liège, 4th EMES international research conference on social enterprise, 18pGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholls A (2009) ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Acc Organ Soc 34:755–769Google Scholar
  29. Pehilvanova P (2009) The decline of trust in post-communist societies: the case of Bulgaria and Russia. Contemp Issues 2(1):32–47Google Scholar
  30. Polishchuk L (2009) Corporate social responsibility or government regulation? An analysis of institutional choice. Probl Econ Trans 52(8):73–94Google Scholar
  31. Power M (2007) Organized uncertainty: designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Santos F, Pache A-C, Birkholz C (2015) Making hybrids work: aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. Calif Manage Rev 57(3):36–58Google Scholar
  33. Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev 20:571–610Google Scholar
  34. Tracey P, Nelson P, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organization forms: a multilevel model. Organ Sci 22(1):60–80Google Scholar
  35. Welter F, Kautonen T (2005) Trust, social networks and enterprise development: exploring evidence from east and west Germany. Int Entrepreneurship Manage J 1:367–379Google Scholar
  36. Welter F, Smallbone D (2009) The emergence of entrepreneurial potential in transition environments: a challenge for entrepreneurship theory or a developmental perspective? In Smallbone D, Landström H, Jones-Evans D (eds) Entrepreneurship and growth in local, regional and national economies. Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Welter F, Smallbone D (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manage 49(1):107–125Google Scholar
  38. Young DR, Kim C (2015) Can social enterprises remain sustainable and mission-focused? Applying resiliency theory. Soc Enterp J 11(3):233–259Google Scholar
  39. Zahra S, Yavuz RI, Ucbasaran D (2006) How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theor Pract 30(4):541–559Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations