Advertisement

Do Greener Products Earn More Green? Examining Biomimicry along with Incremental and Radical Sustainable Product Innovations for UX Designs

  • Snehapriya BharathaEmail author
  • Elizabeth Jensolowsky
  • Michael Teiman
  • Anshu Saxena Arora
  • Jennifer Edmonds
Chapter
Part of the International Marketing and Management Research book series (INMAMAR)

Abstract

Companies strive on product designs. Household sector innovators modify and innovate consumer products as small projects. Innovators use gestalt theory and look at the idea as a whole rather than in parts. These ideas are developed based on the three-dimensional strategy: aesthetics, functionality and symbolism. These design dimensions together show positive influences on a customer’s willingness to pay and generate a positive effect on purchase intentions. There is a strong predictive link between raw idea and consumers’ purchase intentions. Therefore, experts consider consumer panel evaluations. In recent years, making product design ideas environmentally friendly has become popular. Biomimicry is a new concept which encourages designers and product managers to innovate with product designs through emulation of biological forms, processes, patterns and systems. Biomimicry-driven projects produce double intellectual property with double energy savings for one-sixth the resources. The betterment of a product would be done with the help of user experience and design. These design ideas can include radical or incremental innovations. This chapter addresses the following questions:
  • What role does biomimicry play in incremental and radical innovations?

  • Explain how the new innovative product ideas follow three dimensionality: aesthetics, functionality and symbolism?

  • How important is user experience (UX) design in biomimicry-based product innovations?

With respect to the above questions, we discuss three case studies in the consumer goods industry that incorporate biomimicry, user-oriented design and three-dimensional product design strategy of aesthetics, functionality and symbolism. We further suggest an innovative product idea incorporating elements of biomimicry, UX design and sustainable product design. The research provides implications for researchers and managers in developing environmentally sustainable innovations which are user-friendly by understanding new product design and biomimicry.

Keywords

New product design Three-dimensional product design strategy Biomimicry Purchase intentions Consumer goods Radical and incremental 

References

  1. Arora, A. S., & Arora, A. (2017). WYSIWYG – Seeing is believing: Consumer responses to levels of design newness, product innovativeness, and the role of country-of-origin. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S. (2019). Design thinking approaches. In The design imperative (pp. 111–121). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forlizzi, J. (2007). How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 129–136). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Gamage, A., & Hyde, R. (2012). A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design. Architectural Science Review, 55(3), 224–235.Google Scholar
  7. Homburg, C., Schwemmle, M., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kennedy, E. B., & Marting, T. A. (2016). Biomimicry: Streamlining the front end of innovation for environmentally sustainable products: Biomimicry can be a powerful design tool to support sustainability-driven product development in the front end of innovation. Research-Technology Management, 59(4), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koberg, C. S., Detienne, D. R., & Heppard, K. A. (2003). An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kornish, L. J., & Ulrich, K. T. (2014). The importance of the raw idea in innovation: Testing the sow’s ear hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Osorio, F., Dupont, L., Camargo, M., Palominos, P., Peña, J. I., & Alfaro, M. (2019). Design and management of innovation laboratories: Toward a performance assessment tool. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramsey, M. (2016). Baidu to test drive autonomous cars in the US. WSJ Online Article.Google Scholar
  13. Sharma, S., & Sarkar, P. (2019). Biomimicry: Exploring research, challenges, gaps, and tools. In Research into design for a connected world (pp. 87–97). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Slocum, A., & Rubin, E. (2008). Understanding Radical Technology Innovation and its Application to CO2 Capture R&D: Interim Report, Volume One—Literature Review.Google Scholar
  15. Souzandeh, H., Johnson, K. S., Wang, Y., Bhamidipaty, K., & Zhong, W. H. (2016). Soy-protein-based nanofabrics for highly efficient and multifunctional air filtration. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 8(31), 20023–20031.Google Scholar
  16. Suddath, C. (2010). A brief history of: Velcro. Time Magazine.Google Scholar
  17. Veryzer, R., & de Mozota, B. B. (2005). The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: An examination of fundamental relationships. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 128143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Snehapriya Bharatha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth Jensolowsky
    • 2
  • Michael Teiman
    • 2
  • Anshu Saxena Arora
    • 3
  • Jennifer Edmonds
    • 4
  1. 1.Deloitte LLPMechanicsburgUSA
  2. 2.Wilkes UniversityWilkes-BarreUSA
  3. 3.School of Business and Public AdministrationUniversity of the District of ColumbiaWashington, DCUSA
  4. 4.Georgian Court UniversityLakewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations