“I was staying at the camp, and I met this guy on Grindr, and he asked me to move in with him”: Tourists, Immigrants, and Logistical Uses of Socio-Sexual Media

  • Andrew DJ ShieldEmail author


The first of the three analytic chapters establishes that newcomers are optimistic about using platforms geared at gay, bi, trans, and queer people, such as Grindr, to build networks with locals. These online/offline networks can be platonic (such as for friendship) and also logistical, as newcomers search for jobs, housing, and local information via their profile texts and personal chats. Platforms like Grindr also have an undeniably sexual online culture, and sometimes the lines between social, logistical, and sexual requests (or offers) are not clear. Theories of gay cosmopolitan tourism and queer migration guide the chapter’s argument that not all newcomers experience online socio-sexual cultures equally. Many immigrants have been more successful connecting with other immigrants than with European locals, whether for friendship, sex, or logistical purposes.


Social networking Integration Queer migration Tourism Self-presentation 


  1. Aldrich, Robert. Colonialism and Homosexuality. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, Robert. The Seduction of the Mediterranean: Writing, Art, and Homosexual Fantasy. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell, Courtney, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. “Seeing and Being Seen: Co-situation and Impression Formation Using Grindr, a Location-Aware Gay Dating App.” New Media & Society 17 (2015): 1117–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, Joseph. “Cruising for Cash: Prostitution on Grindr.” Discourse, Context & Media 17 (2017): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duguay, Stefanie. “Identity Modulation in Networked Publics: Queer Women’s Participation and Representation on Tinder, Instagram, and Vine.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. El-Tayeb, Fatima. “‘Gays Who Cannot Properly Be Gay’: Queer Muslims in the Neoliberal European City.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 19 (February 2012): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fanon, Franz. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann. London: Pluto Press, 1986 [1952].Google Scholar
  8. Grindr. “Grindr Terms and Conditions of Service.” Terms of Service. Effective Date: 30 March 2017, accessed Fall 2017 via
  9. Grov, Christian, A. S. Breslow, M. E. Newcomb, J. G. Rosenberger, and J. A. Bauermeister. “Gay and Bisexual Men’s Use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013.” Journal of Sex Research 51, no. 4 (2014): 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Light, Ben, Gordon Fletcher, and Alison Adam. “Gay Men, Gaydar and the Commodification of Difference.” Information Technology and People 21, no. 3 (2008): 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luibhéid, Eithne, and Lionel Cantú. Queer Migrations: Sexuality, U.S. Citizenship, and Border Crossings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Massad, Joseph. Desiring Arabs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, Gregory. “TurboConsumers™ in Paradise: Tourism, Civil Rights, and Brazil’s Gay Sex Industry.” American Ethnologist 38, no. 4 (2011): 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ong, Jonathan Corpus. “Queer Cosmopolitanism in the Disaster Zone: ‘My Grindr Became the United Nations’.” International Communication Gazette 79, nos. 6–7 (2017): 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pérez, Hiram. A Taste for Brown Bodies: Gay Modernity and Cosmopolitan Desire. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Puar, Jasbir. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. Shield, Andrew DJ. “New in Town: Gay Immigrants and Geosocial Dating Apps.” In LGBTQs, Media, and Culture in Europe, edited by Alexander Dhoest, Lukasz Szulc, and Bart Eeckhout, 244–261. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations