Advertisement

“The glittering future of a new invention”: Historicizing Grindr Culture

  • Andrew DJ ShieldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

“Grindr Studies” has emerged as an academic field and examines the cultural practices of especially gay men “on app,” including topics like self-presentation strategies, online/offline dynamics, and sexual racism. Grindr research builds upon decades of scholarly inquiries into online cultures, including studies of digital queer subcultures and online racism. In this chapter, Shield weaves together his own personal experiences in digital spaces for primarily gay men since the 1990s with the contemporaneous scholarly literature on gay sexuality and race online.

Keywords

Grindr studies Socio-sexual Chat rooms Dating profiles Media history 

Bibliography

  1. Bartoş, Sebastian, Voon Chin Phua, and Erin Avery. “Differences in Romanian Men’s Online Personals by Sexualities.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 17 (2009): 145–154.Google Scholar
  2. Baym, Nancy K. “The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community, edited by Steven G. Jones, 138–163. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Baym, Nancy K. Personal Connections in the Digital Age, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, Chris, Fran Martin, and Audrey Yue, eds. Mobile Cultures: New Media in Queer Asia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Blackwell, Courtney, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. “Seeing and Being Seen: Co-Situation and Impression Formation Using Grindr, a Location-Aware Gay Dating App.” New Media & Society 17 (2015): 1117–1136.Google Scholar
  6. Boston, Nicholas. “Libidinal Cosmopolitanism: The Case of Digital Sexual Encounters in Post-Enlargement Europe.” In Postcolonial Transitions in Europe: Contexts, Practices and Politics, edited by Sandra Ponzanesi and Gianmaria Colpani, 291–312. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In Hand-Book of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J.G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood, 2011 [1985].Google Scholar
  8. boyd, danah. “White Flight in Networked Publics? How Race and Class Shaped American Teen Engagement with MySpace and Facebook.” In Race After the Internet, edited by Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White, 203–222. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. boyd, danah. “Why Youth <3 Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by David Buckingham. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. boyd, danah, and Nicole B. Ellison. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, no. 2 (2007): 210–230.Google Scholar
  11. Brock, André. “From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, no. 4 (2012): 529–549.Google Scholar
  12. Brubaker, Jed R., Mike Ananny, and Kate Crawford. “Departing Glances: A Sociotechnical Account of ‘Leaving’ Grindr.” New Media & Society 18, no. 3 (2014): 373–390.Google Scholar
  13. Bumgarner, Brett A. “Mobilizing the Gay Bar: Grindr and the Layering of Spatial Context.” Paper presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, London, UK, 17–21 June 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Burgess, Jean, Elija Cassidy, Stefanie Duguay, and Ben Light. “Making Digital Cultures of Gender and Sexuality with Social Media.” Social Media + Society 2, no. 4 (2016).Google Scholar
  15. Burrell, Earl, Heather Pines, Edward Robbie, Leonardo Coleman, Ryan Murphy, Kirsten Hess, and Pamina Gorbach. “Use of the Location-Based Social Networking Application GRINDR as a Recruitment Tool in Rectal Microbicide Development Research.” AIDS and Behavior 16, no. 7 (2012): 1816–1820.Google Scholar
  16. Callander, Denton, Christy E. Newman, and Martin Holt. “Is Sexual Racism Really Racism? Distinguishing Attitudes Toward Sexual Racism and Generic Racism Among Gay and Bisexual Men.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 44 (2015): 1991–2000.Google Scholar
  17. Cassidy, Elija, and Wilfred Yang Wang. “Gay Men’s Digital Cultures Beyond Gaydar and Grindr: LINE Use in the Gay Chinese Diaspora of Australia.” Information, Communication & Society 2, no. 6 (2018): 851–865.Google Scholar
  18. Centner, Ryan, and Martin Zebracki. “Gay Male Urban Spaces After Grindr & Gentrification.” Call for papers for the Annual Conference of the Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers 2017, http://www.zebracki.org/cfp-rgs-ibg-2017-gay-male-urban-spaces/.
  19. Chan, Lik Sam. “How Sociocultural Context Matters in Self-Presentation: A Comparison of U.S. and Chinese Profiles on Jack’d, a Mobile Dating App for Men Who Have Sex With Men.” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 6040–6059.Google Scholar
  20. Chaplin, Tamara. “Lesbians Online: Queer Identity and Community Formation on the French Minitel.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 22, no. 3 (2014): 451–472.Google Scholar
  21. Cocks, H.G. Classified: The Secret History of the Personal Column. London: Random House Books, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, Rodney. “Efféminés, Gigolos, and MSMs in the Cyber-Networks, Coffeehouses, and ‘Secret Gardens’ of Contemporary Tunis.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 8, no. 3 (2012): 89–112.Google Scholar
  24. Collins, Alan, and Stephen Drinkwater. “Fifty Shades of Gay: Social and Technological Change, Urban Deconcentration and Niche Enterprise.” Urban Studies 54, no. 3 (2017): 765–785.Google Scholar
  25. Conley, Terri D. “Perceived Proposer Personality Characteristics and Gender Differences in Acceptance of Casual Sex Offers.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (2011): 309–329.Google Scholar
  26. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, no. 1 (1989): 139–167.Google Scholar
  27. Dhoest, Alexander. “Media, Visibility and Sexual Identity Among Gay Men with a Migration Background.” Sexualities 19, no. 4 (2016): 412–431.Google Scholar
  28. Dhoest, Alexander, and Lukasz Szulc. “Navigating Online Selves: Social, Cultural and Material Contexts of Social Media Use by Diasporic Gay Men.” Social Media + Society 2, no. 4 (2016): 1–10.Google Scholar
  29. Dhoest, Alexander, Lukasz Szulc, and Bart Eeckhout. “Introduction.” In LGBTQs, Media, and Culture in Europe, edited by Alexander Dhoest, Lukasz Szulc, and Bart Eeckhout, 1–12. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Driscoll, Kevin. “Hobbyist Inter-Networking and the Popular Internet Imaginary: Forgotten Histories of Networked Personal Computing, 1978–1998.” PhD diss., University of Southern California, 2014.Google Scholar
  31. Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Mattias Duyves. “Gai Pied After Ten Years: A Commercial Success, A Moral Bankruptcy?” Journal of Homosexuality 25, no. 1–2 (1993): 205–213.Google Scholar
  32. Duyves, Mathias. “The Minitel: The Glittering Future of a New Invention.” Journal of Homosexuality 25, nos. 1–2 (1993): 193–203.Google Scholar
  33. Dyer, Richard. “Male Gay Porn: Coming to Terms.” Jump Cut (A Review of Contemporary Media), no. 30 (March 1985): 27–29. https://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/JC30folder/GayPornDyer.html.
  34. Dyer, Richard. White. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Ellison, Nicole B., and danah boyd. “Sociality Through Social Network Sites.” In The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, edited by William H. Dutton, 151–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  36. Escoffier, Jeffrey. Bigger Than Life: The History of Gay Porn Cinema from Beefcake to Hardcore. Philadelphia: Running Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  37. Ferreday, Debra. Online Belongings: Fantasy, Affect and Web Communities. Bern: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Fincher, David, Scott Rudin, Dana Brunetti, Michael De Luca, Ceán Chaffin, Aaron Sorkin, et al. The Social Network. Directed by David Fincher. Culver City, CA: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Gagné, Matthew. “Queer Beirut Online: The Participation of Men in Gayromeo.com.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 8, no. 3 (2012): 113–137.Google Scholar
  40. Garde-Hansen, Joanne, and Kristyn Gorton. Emotion Online, Theorizing Affect on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  41. Gosine, Andil. “Brown to Blonde at Gay.com: Passing White in Queer Cyberspace.” In Queer Online: Media Technology and Sexuality, edited by Kate O’Riordan and David J. Phillips, 139–154. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar
  42. Gross, Larry. “Foreword.” In Getting It on Online: Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality, and Embodied Identity, edited by John Edward Campbell, i–xiv. London: Harrington Park Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  43. Gudelunas, David. “Online Personal Ads: Community and Sex, Virtually.” Journal of Homosexuality 49, no. 1 (2005): 62–87.Google Scholar
  44. Gudelunas, David. “There’s an App for That: The Uses and Gratifications of Online Social Networks for Gay Men.” Sexuality & Culture 16 (2012): 347–365.Google Scholar
  45. Helmann, Rasmus. “‘Er du den sutteglade fyr, jeg søger?’: Efter ti år er appen Grindr mere end bare et kødkatalog” [After Ten Years: Grindr Is More Than Just a Meat Catalog]. Politiken, 7 January 2019, https://politiken.dk/kultur/art6937614/Efter-ti-%C3%A5r-er-appen-Grindr-mere-end-bare-et-k%C3%B8dkatalog.
  46. Hou, Cheng-Nan. “An Aggregated Interface of Xingtian Gods in Synopticon: Theorizing the Picture of Using Western Gay LBRTD App in a Chinese Perspective.” Paper presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, Fukuoka, Japan, 9–13 June 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Humphreys, Lee. The Qualified Self: Social Media and the Cataloguing of Everyday Life. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  48. Katyal, Akhil. “Playing a Double Game: Idioms of Same Sex Desire in India.” PhD diss., University of London, 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Kolko, Beth. “Erasing @race: Going White in the (Inter)Face.” In Race in Cyberspace, edited by Beth Kolko, Lisa Nakamura, and Gilbert Rodman. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  50. Kolko, Beth, Lisa Nakamura, and Gilbert Rodman. “Introduction.” In Race in Cyberspace, edited by Beth Kolko, Lisa Nakamura, and Gilbert Rodman. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  51. Kozinets, Robert V. Netnography: Redefined. Los Angeles: Sage, 2015.Google Scholar
  52. Kuntsman, Adi. Figurations of Violence and Belonging: Queerness, Migranthood and Nationalism in Cyberspace and Beyond. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
  53. Kuntsman, Adi, and Noor Al-Qasimi. “Introduction.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 8, no. 3 (2012): 1–13.Google Scholar
  54. Light, Ben. “Introducing Masculinity Studies to Information Systems Research: The Case of Gaydar.” European Journal of Information Systems 16, no. 5 (2007): 658–665.Google Scholar
  55. Light, Ben. “Networked Masculinities and Social Networking Sites: A Call for the Analysis of Men and Contemporary Digital Media.” Masculinities and Social Change 2, no. 3 (2013): 245–265.Google Scholar
  56. Light, Ben, Gordon Fletcher, and Alison Adam. “Gay men, Gaydar and the Commodification of Difference.” Information Technology and People 21, no. 3 (2008): 300–314.Google Scholar
  57. Lin, D.C. “Sissies Online: Taiwanese Male Queers Performing Sissinesses in Cyberspaces.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 7, no. 2 (2006): 270–288.Google Scholar
  58. Livia, Anna. “Public and Clandestine: Gay Men’s Pseudonyms on the French Minitel.” Sexualities 5, no. 2 (2002): 201–217.Google Scholar
  59. Mailland, Julien, and Kevin Driscoll. Minitel: Welcome to the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  60. Mattson, Greggor. “Centering Provincial Gay Life.” Paper at the Annual Conference of the Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers 2017. http://conference.rgs.org/AC2017/338.
  61. McGlotten, Shaka. Virtual Intimacy: Media, Affect, and Queer Sociality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  62. Merrick, Jeffrey. Order and Disorder Under the Ancien Régime. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
  63. Miller, Brandon. “‘Dude, Where’s Your Face?’ Self-Presentation, Self-Description, and Partner Preferences on a Social Networking Application for Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Content Analysis.” Sexuality & Culture 19, no. 4 (2015): 637–658.Google Scholar
  64. Mitra, Rahul, and Radhika Gajjala. “Queer Blogging in Indian Digital Diasporas: A Dialogic Encounter.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 32, no. 4 (2008): 400–423.Google Scholar
  65. Møller, Kristian, and Michael Nebeling Petersen. “Bleeding Boundaries: Domesticating Gay Hook-Up Apps.” In Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities, edited by Rikke Andreassen, Michael Nebeling Petersen, and Katherine Harrison, Tobias Raun, 208–224. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
  66. Mowlabocus, Sharif. Gaydar Culture: Gay Men, Technology and Embodiment. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
  67. Musto, Michael. “Gay Dance Clubs on the Wane in the Age of Grindr.” The New York Times, 26 April 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/fashion/gay-dance-clubs-grindr.html.
  68. Nakamura, Lisa. Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York and London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  69. Nakamura, Lisa. Digitizing Race Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  70. Nakamura, Lisa. “Race and Identity in Digital Media.” In Mass Media and Society, 5th ed., edited by James Curran. London: Sage, 2010.Google Scholar
  71. Nip, Joyce Y.M. “The Queer Sisters and Its Electronic Bulletin Board: A Study of the Internet for Social Movement Mobilization.” Information, Communication and Society 7, no. 1 (2004): 23–49.Google Scholar
  72. O’Riordan, Kate. “Queer Theories and Cybersubjects: Intersecting Figures.” In Queer Online: Media Technology and Sexuality, edited by Kate O’Riordan and David J. Phillips, 13–30. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar
  73. Peumans, Wim. “‘No Asians, Please’: Same-Sex Sexualities and Ethnic Minorities in Europe.” In Hand Picked: Stimulus Respond, edited by Jack Boulton, 128–139. London: Pavement Books, 2014.Google Scholar
  74. Phua, Voon Chin, and Gayle Kaufman. “The Crossroads of Race and Sexuality: Date Selection Among Men in Internet ‘Personal’ Ads.” Journal of Family Issues 8 (November 2003): 981–995.Google Scholar
  75. Poell, Thomas, and José van Dijck. “Social Media and Activist Communication.” In The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, edited by Chris Atton, 527–537. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
  76. Poster, Mark. The Second Media Age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  77. Race, Kane. “‘Party and Play’: Online Hook-Up Devices and the Emergence of PNP Practices Among Gay Men.” Sexualities 18, no. 3 (2015): 253–275.Google Scholar
  78. Race, Kane. “Speculative Pragmatism and Intimate Arrangements: Online Hook-Up Devices in Gay Life.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 17, no. 4 (2014): 496–511.Google Scholar
  79. Race, Kane. The Gay Science: Intimate Experiments with the Problem of HIV. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
  80. Raynes-Goldie, Kate. “Aliases, Creeping, and Wall Cleaning: Understanding Privacy in the Age of Facebook.” First Monday 15, no. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
  81. Rheingold, Howard. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1993.Google Scholar
  82. Roth, Yoel. “Zero Feet Away: The Digital Geography of Gay Social Media.” Journal of Homosexuality 63, no. 3 (2015): 437–442.Google Scholar
  83. Shaw, David. “Gay Men and Computer Communication: A Discourse of Sex and Identity in Cyberspace.” In Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety, edited by Steven Jones, 133–146. London: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar
  84. Shield, Andrew DJ. “‘Suriname—Seeking a Lonely, Lesbian Friend for Correspondence’: Immigration and Homo-Emancipation in the Netherlands, 1965–79.” History Workshop Journal 78, no. 1 (2014): 246–264.Google Scholar
  85. Shield, Andrew DJ. “Grindr Culture: Intersectional and Socio-Sexual.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 18, no. 1 (2018): 149–161.Google Scholar
  86. Shield, Andrew DJ. Immigrants in the Sexual Revolution: Perceptions and Participation in Northwest Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
  87. Silver, David. “Margins in the Wires: Looking for Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Blacksburg Electronic Village.” In Race in Cyberspace, edited by Beth Kolko, Lisa Nakamura, and Gilbert Rodman. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, Jesus G. “Two-Faced Racism in Gay Online Sex: Preference in the Frontstage or Racism in the Backstage?” In Sex in the Digital Age, edited by Paul Nixon and Isabel Düsterhöft, 134–145. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
  89. Staudinger, Chris. “Loading More Guys: Shining a Light on Gay Dating in the App Age.” Antigravity, May 2017, http://www.antigravitymagazine.com/2017/05/loading-more-guys-shining-a-light-on-gay-dating-in-the-app-age/.
  90. Staunæs, Dorthe. “Where Have All the Subjects Gone? Bringing Together the Concepts of Intersectionality and Subjectification.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 11, no. 2 (2003): 101–110.Google Scholar
  91. Stone, Allucquère Rosanne [Sandy]. The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  92. Szulc, Lukasz. “Domesticating the Nation Online: Banal Nationalism on LGBTQ Websites in Poland and Turkey.” Sexualities 19, no. 3 (2016): 304–327.Google Scholar
  93. Szulc, Lukasz. “The Geography of LGBTQ Internet Studies.” International Journal of Communication 8 (2014): 2927–2931.Google Scholar
  94. Titley, Gavan. “No Apologies for Cross-Posting: European Trans-Media Space and the Digital Circuitries of Racism.” Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture 5, no. 1 (2014): 41–55.Google Scholar
  95. Trumbach, Randolph. “‘Renaissance Sodomy, 1500–1700’ and ‘Modern Sodomy: The Origins of Modern Homosexuality, 1700–1800’.” In A Gay History of Britain, edited by Matt Cook, Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2007.Google Scholar
  96. Tsang, Daniel. “Notes on Queer ‘N Asian Virtual Sex.” Amerasia Journal 20, no. 1 (1994): 117–128.Google Scholar
  97. Turkle, Sherry. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.Google Scholar
  98. Van Der Meer, Theo. “Sodomy and the Pursuit of a Third Sex in the Early Modern Period.” In Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, edited by Gilbert Herdt. New York: Zone Books, 1994.Google Scholar
  99. van Gent, Wouter, and Gerald Brugman. “Emancipation and the City: The Fragmented Spatiality of Migrant Gay Men in Amsterdam & New York.” Paper at the Annual Conference of the Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers 2017, http://conference.rgs.org/AC2017/306.
  100. von Rosen, Wilhelm. “A Short History of Gay Denmark 1613–1989: The Rise and the Possibly Happy End of the Danish Homosexual.” Nordisk Sexologi 12 (1994): 125–136.Google Scholar
  101. Wakeford, Nina. “Cyberqueer.” In Lesbian and Gay Studies: A Critical Introduction, edited by Andy Medhurst and Sally R. Hunt, 20–38. London: Cassell, 1997.Google Scholar
  102. Wasserbauer, Marion. “‘I Think I’m Quite Fluid with Those Kinds of Things’: Exploring Music and Non-heterosexual Women’s Identities.” In LGBTQs, Media, and Culture in Europe, edited by Alexander Dhoest, Lukasz Szulc, and Bart Eeckhout, 80–97. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations