Advertisement

Green Infrastructure and Social Welfare. Lessons for Sustainable Urban Development in the Metropolitan Zone of Leon, Mexico

  • Jairo Agustín Reyes PlataEmail author
  • Mónica Elías Orozco
  • Iliana Zuri Jiménez Villaseñor
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable is a goal of sustainable development (Sustainable Development Goal 11, SDG 11). To achieve sustainable cities, urban planning of natural spaces must contribute to deal with the socioenvironmental challenges brought by urbanization. However, planning strategies for green infrastructure are frequently skewed toward ecological aspects. Such a unidimensional perspective in the development of planning tools may have a poor contribution to social welfare. Therefore, there is a need for integrating the social aspects to achieve effective planning, and to recognize the social contributions of green infrastructure. The objective of this study is to diagnose the functions and dysfunctions of green infrastructure, as well as its contributions to the social welfare in the Metropolitan Zone of Leon, Mexico. The area of study is characterized by an accelerated urban growth in one of the most dynamic industrial regions in the country. The methodology includes an assessment of green infrastructure components of its distribution. An evaluation of welfare-related social context was also conducted. Main results showed that (i) green infrastructure can be a strategic approach for the land sustainability, (ii) the metropolitan area of Leon showed the existence of key green infrastructure components and reveled a fragmented network of natural spaces and (iii) people perceived social and environmental functions and dysfunctions from green infrastructure components. This study has concluded that an effective planning approach to green infrastructure should integrate functions and dysfunctions related to social context. This approach may contribute to create more sustainable cities with benefits for all people.

Keywords

Green infrastructure Social welfare Quality of life Urban sustainability Planning 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by  UNAM-PAPIIT IA402418.

References

  1. Álcala L (2007) Dimensiones urbanas del problema habitacional. El caso de la ciudad de Resistencia, Argentina. Revista Invi 22(59):35–68Google Scholar
  2. Austin G (2017) Infraestructura verde para la planeación del paisaje. Interacción humana y sistemas naturales. Trillas S.A de C.V (ed), Ciudad de MexicoGoogle Scholar
  3. Busquets J, Cortina A (eds) (2009) Gestión del Paisaje. Manual de protección, gestión y ordenación del paisaje (1ra edn). Ariel, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendict M, McMahon E (2006) Green infrastructure. Linking landscape and communities. The Conservations Fund, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  5. Calaza P (2016) Infraestructura verde. Sistema Natural de Salud Pública. Ediciones Mundi Presa, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  6. Calderon-Contreras R, Quiroz-Rosas L (2017) Analyzing scale, quality and diversity of green infrastructure and the provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: a case from Mexico City. Ecosyst Serv 23:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro Castro LJ (2018) La Planeación sostenible de ciudades. Propuestas para el desarrollo de infraestructura. Fondo de Cultura Económica, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorm D (2015) Infraestructura verde: una vida mejor mediante soluciones naturales. Boletín de la AEMA, European Environment Agency (EEA (2015/3). https://www.eea.europa.eu/es/articles/infraestructura-verde-una-vida-mejor. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  9. Gelh J (2013) La humanización del espacio urbano (5ta. edn). Reverté, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay A (1995) Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Trans Inst Br Geogr 20(4):500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. INEGI. Encuesta intercensal (2015). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  12. INEGI (2018) Mapa Digital de México. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía INEGI. http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/temas/mapadigital/. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  13. Iplaneg (2018a) Instituto de Planeación del Estado de Guanajuato. Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato. México. https://iplaneg.guanajuato.gob.mx/?page_id=11. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
  14. Iplaneg (2018b) Plan Estatal de Desarrollo Guanajuato 2040. Construyendo el Futuro. Gobierno del Estado de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  15. Jennings V, Larson L, Yun J (2016) Advancing sustainability through urban green pace: cultural ecosystem services, equity, and social determinants of health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(2):196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lezama JL, Domínguez J (2006) Medio Ambiente y sustentabilidad urbana. Papeles Población 12(49):153–176Google Scholar
  17. Moreno S (2008) La habitabilidad urbana como condición de calidad de vida. Palapa III(II):47–54Google Scholar
  18. Selman P (2012) Sustainable landscape planning. The reconnection agenda. Great Britain, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Svara J, Brunet J (2005) Social equity is a pillar of public administration. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249675111_Social_Equity_Is_a_Pillar_of_Public_Administration. Accessed 8 Dec 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme) (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/2013 https://unhabitat.org/books/prosperity-of-cities-state-of-the-worlds-cities-20122013/. Prosperity of Cities. Accessed 31 July 2018
  21. UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme) (2017) The new urban agenda. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2018
  22. UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme) (2018) Urban planning and design. https://unhabitat.org/expertise/2-urban-planning-and-design/. Accessed 31 July 2018
  23. Vásquez A, Devoto C, Giannotti E, Velásquez P (2016) Green infrastructure system facing fragmented cities in Latin Amerixa-Case of Santiago, Chile. Procedia Eng 161:1410–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Assche K, Verschraegen G (2008) The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann’s systems. Theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Plann Theor 7(3):263–283Google Scholar
  25. Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (2018) zoho.com. In: Z. Corporation (ed). https://www.zoho.com/ Accessed 7 al 19 de octubre de 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jairo Agustín Reyes Plata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mónica Elías Orozco
    • 2
  • Iliana Zuri Jiménez Villaseñor
    • 2
  1. 1.Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoLeónMéxico
  2. 2.Universidad Iberoamericana LeónLeónMéxico

Personalised recommendations