Inequality: Driver or Inhibitor of Collective Action?

  • Christopher K. FrantzEmail author
  • Amineh Ghorbani
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Inequality is considered one of the drivers for the emergence of collective action, but conventional wisdom suggests that it is equality among the stakeholders that helps sustain it. Nonetheless, more controversial findings in the collective action literature suggest that inequality can in fact be beneficial for the sustainability of collective action beyond its emergence. In this research, we use simulation to gain more insights into the relationship between inequality and collective action. We simulate an abstract common-pool resource system to model collective action and consider different types of inequality (e.g., wealth, social influence) to study its correlation with the sustainability of the system in terms of resource well-being, wealth levels and distribution. Preliminary results suggest that equality promotes sustained collective action, but also highlight that factors such as social influence and individual behavioural characteristics may be more decisive in determining the overall well-being.


Inequality Wealth Social influence Social-value orientation Clustering DBSCAN Collective action 


  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André, C., & Platteau, J.-P. (1998). Land relations under unbearable stress: Rwanda caught in the malthusian trap. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 34, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (2006). Collective action on the commons: The role of inequality. In J.-M. Baland, P. Bardhan, & S. Bowles (Eds.), Inequality, cooperation, and environmental sustainability (pp. 10–35). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, conflicts, and cooperation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, Y., Ben-Jacob, E., & Shapira, Y. (2016). The dynamics of wealth inequality and the effect of income distribution. PLoS One, 11(4), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In E. Simoudis, J. Han, & U. Fayyad (Eds.), Second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 226–231). Portland, Oregon: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ghorbani, A., & Bravo, G. (2016). Managing the commons: A simple model of the emergence of institutions through collective action. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griesinger, D. W., & Livingston, J. W. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18(3), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keister, L. A., & Moller, S. (2000). Wealth inequality in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lichbach, M. I. (1989). An evaluation of “does economic inequality breed political conflict?” studies. World Politics, 41(4), 431–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, R. O., Ackerman, K. A., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision making, 6(8), 771–781.Google Scholar
  15. North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)GjøvikNorway
  2. 2.Delft University of Technology (TU Delft)DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations