Advertisement

Measuring the Provision of Access to Sustainable Energy in the EU as a New Task of Modern Economics in Line with Agenda 2030

  • KRYK BarbaraEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The purpose of the chapter is to measure and assess the level of sustainable energy provision in EU countries in the context of Goal 7 of the Agenda 2030. Ensuring access to sustainable energy for people and increasing energy efficiency in all sectors of the economy is one of the most important goals both in the European Union (EU) and globally. It was recognized that access to modern energy services at affordable prices is necessary to achieve the goals of the concept of sustainable development, Agenda 2030, Europe 2020 strategy, and the European energy policy. Precise evaluation of achievements in this area (using modern quantitative methods) is a relatively new issue, both in economic practice and in modern economics; therefore, there is a need to develop ways to measure access to sustainable energy, other than simply analyzing the time series of data in individual years on which the previous research was based. Hence, an attempt was made to use the taxonomic measure of development, to assess the achievements of individual EU countries, and to organize them according to the degree of sustainable energy provision, which is a novelty in this respect and includes the article to the research trend oriented toward the operationalization of the concept of sustainable development. The research used eight core indicators for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), seven reported by Eurostat and set by the UN. The research period is 2010 and 2016. The conducted research allowed to formulate conclusions on the current achievements of the member states and the EU as a whole with respect to the achievement of Goal 7 of the Agenda 2030, as well as formulating recommendations for necessary actions.

Keywords

Sustainable energy Agenda 2030 EU Modern economy Taxonomic measure of development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project is financed within the framework of the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education under the name “Regional Excellence Initiative” in the years 2019–2022, project number 001/RID/2018/19, the amount of financing PLN 10,684,000.00.

References

  1. 1.
    Bąk, I., Markowicz, I.: Taksonomiczne mierniki rozwoju w klasyfikacji obiektów (na przykładzie usług kulturalnych). Wiadomości Statystyczne 4, 32–39 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borys, T. (ed.): Wskaźniki rozwoju zrównoważonego, p. 62. Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Środowisko, Warszawa-Białystok (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union: JoL C 326 of 26.10.2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Council of the EU: Council Decision 590 of 11 April 2016 on the Signing, on Behalf of the European Union, of the Paris Agreement Adopted Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Chang, Brussels (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Commission: Mainstreaming Sustainable Development into EU Policies: 2009 Review of the European Union (2009) Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM (2009) 400 final, Brussels (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Next Steps for a Sustainable European Future European Action for Sustainability. COM (2016) 739 final, Brussels (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Commission: Towards a Sustainable Europe by 2030. COM (2019) 22 final. ANNEXES 1 to 3, Brussels (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: A Clean Planet for all A European Strategic Long-term Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy. COM 773 final, Brussels (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Commission: A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. COM 15 final, Brussels (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Commission: A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy COM 80 final, Brussels (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission: Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM 2020, Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Eurostat: Sustainable Development in the European Union, Monitoring Report On Progress Towards The SDGs In An Eu Context, p. 132. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grzegorczyk, E.: Taxonomic analysis of the level private equity venture capital market in Europe. In: Proceedings of IAC in Dresden. Czech Institute of Academic Education z.s., Praque.  https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201810.0749.v1 (2018)
  15. 15.
    Hellwig, Z.: Application of the taxonomic method to the countries typology according to their level of development and the structure of resources and qualified staff (in Polish). Przegląd Statystyczny 15(4), 307–326 (1968)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jajuga, K., Walesiak, M., Bąk, A.: On the general distance masure. In: Schwaiger, M., Opitz, O. (eds.) Exploratory Data Analysis in Empirical Research, pp. 104–109. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kryka, B.: Providing sustainable energy in Poland in comparison to the European Union in light of the seventh goal of the 2030 Agenda. Ekonomia i Środowisko 1(68), 22–36 (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kryk, B.: Implementation of the concept of sustainable development in Poland in the context of goal 12 of the Agenda 2030. In: Conference Proceeding 5th International Conference SGEM 2018 SOCIAL SCIENCES & ARTS Scientifically. Economics and Tourism. Mod. Sci. 5(1.4), 391–398 (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A.R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., Bansal, R.C.: A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69, 596–609 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Khalifah, Z., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., Nor, K.M., Khoshnoudi, M.: A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 71, 216–256 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mastalerz-Kodzis, A., Pośpiech, E.: Zastosowanie wybranych elementów analizy fundamentalnej do wyznaczania portfeli optymalnych. Studia Ekonomiczne 146, 68–78 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Radovanovic, M., Ivanivic, O.M., Teodorovic, N.: The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe-the use of linear regression method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(1), 766–772 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shen, K.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H.: Advances in multiple criteria decision making for sustainability: modeling and applications. Sustainability 10, 1600 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Bąk, I, Kiba-Janiak, M, Saniuk, S, Dembińska, I., Ioppolo, G.: The application of relative taxonomy to the study of disproportions in the area of sustainable development of the European Union. Land Use Policy 68 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tarczyński, W., Łuniewska, M.: Classic, fundamental and horizontally diversified portfolios—comparative analysis (in Polish). Acta Univ. Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica 177, 171–189 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tarczyński, W.: A taxonomic measure of the attraction of investments in securities (in Polish). Przegląd Statystyczny 41, 275–300 (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    United Nations: Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/69/313 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    United Nations: The Global Partnership for Development: Time to Deliver (MDG Gap Task Force Report). https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2011_Gap_Report/11-38394%20(E)%20MDG%20Gap%20Report%202011_WEB%20NEW.pdf (2011). Accessed 10 Apr 2019
  29. 29.
    United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walesiak, M.: Multivariate statistical analysis in marketing research (in Polish). Research Papers Wroclaw University of Economics 101(654), Wrocław (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SzczecinSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations