Advertisement

China’s New Style of Globalization as a Route to a More Sustainable Growth Path

  • Piotr ŁasakEmail author
  • René W. H. van der Linden
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the foundation for a new type of globalization whereby China positions itself in the center with BRI as the major infrastructural project. Finally, this should lead to a transition toward a more developed economy. In this chapter, the current trade war, i.e. the ongoing trade conflict between China and USA and related increase of inbound and outbound investments are explained to show the impact of China on the world economy and the changing role of the Chinese companies from global manufacturers to global investors. Since Chinese private-owned enterprises currently account for half of the China’s outbound FDIs, the number and size of private-owned enterprises are growing and an increasing number of them are also joining hands with state-owned enterprises to expand globally. As a global player in terms of trade and investments, China’s monetary and foreign exchange policy is playing a more significant role in the world as well with the largest stock of foreign exchange reserves and a currency listed on the IMF’s reserve basket. China’s new style of globalization is also described in a policy trilemma context. Although China never abandoned all its capital controls, there were numerous ways to move money into and out of China. At the same time, the RMB has started to float more against the USD and liberalized its interest rates without too much impact on the exchange rate. Thus, the policy makers made the argument that China negotiated between the three choices and in essence circumvented the logic of the impossible trinity. With the rise of China’s shadow banking since the global financial crisis and the desire for more RMB internationalization since the late 2000s, the increasing financial liberalization is at odds with the striving for more financial stability. The significant costs associated with the credit crisis added financial stability to the policy trilemma policy goals, modifying its framework into the policy quadrilemma. China and other emerging markets frequently coupled their growing financial integration with sizable hoarding of reserves, as a means of self-insuring their growing exposure to financial turbulences. Also, the impact of the BRI in the policy trilemma or quadrilemma is examined. China’s new style of globalization to a more sustainable growth model is eventually described as the main feature of China’s ‘new normal’ economy and as a way to avoid a ‘middle-income trap’ in the near future.

Keywords

New type of globalization Sustainable growth path Inbound and outbound investments Foreign exchange reserves IMF’s reserve basket Impossible trinity Policy trilemma and policy quadrilemma RMB internationalization ‘New normal’ economy ‘Middle-income trap’ 

References

  1. Aizenman, J. (2011, March 1). The Impossible Trinity: From the Policy Trilemma to the Policy Quadrilemma. Santa Cruz: University of California. Google Scholar
  2. Aizenman, J., & Sengupta, R. (2012). The Financial Trilemma in China and a Comparative Analysis with India. UCSC and the NBER India: IFMR.Google Scholar
  3. Aizenman, J., Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2013). The “Impossible Trinity” Hypothesis in an Era of Global Imbalances: Measurement and Testing. Review of International Economics, 3(21), 447–458.Google Scholar
  4. Bernanke, B. (2016, March 9). A Fresh Approach to Fiscal Stimulus Is China’s Only Solution to the Impossible Trinity Devaluations and Capital Controls Won’t Work. Bloomberg.Google Scholar
  5. BIS. (2008). Financial Globalisation and Emerging Market Capital Flows (Vol. 44).Google Scholar
  6. Chen, S., & Kang, J. S. (2018, January). Credit Booms—Is China Different? (IMF Working Paper, WP/18/2).Google Scholar
  7. Das, S. (2019). China’s Evolving Exchange Rate Regime (IMF Working Paper, WP/19/50).Google Scholar
  8. Davis, C. (2018, March 9). It Is Up to China to Save the Global Trading System. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  9. Dieppe, A., Gilhooly, R., Han, J., Korhonen, I., & Lodge, D. (2018, January). The Transition of China to Sustainable Growth—Implications for the Global Economy and the Euro Area (ECB Occasional Paper Series No. 206).Google Scholar
  10. Drysdale, P., & Hardwick, S. (2018). China and the Global Trading System: Then and Now. In L. Song & C. Feng (Eds.), China’s 40 Years of Reform and Development 1978–2018. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ernst & Young. (2015, March). Riding the Silk Road: China Sees Outbound Investment Boom: Outlook for China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment.Google Scholar
  12. Gloria, E. (2014). China’s Exchange Rate Regimes and Their Policy Implications. Asian Center.Google Scholar
  13. Goldstein, M., & Lardy, N. R. (2008). China’s Exchange Rate Policy: An Overview of Some Key Issues. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Green, F., & Stern, N. (2015, June). China’s “New Normal”: Structural Change, Better Growth, and Peak Emissions. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  15. Gujon, M., & Guérineau, S. (2006, March–April). The Modification of the Chinese Exchange Rate Policy: Its Rationale, Extent and Recent Developments. China Perspectives, 64, 1–14. Google Scholar
  16. Gwiazda, A. (2017). The Sluggish Internationalization of the Renminbi. Bank i Kredyt, 48(5), 483–494.Google Scholar
  17. He, H. (2019, May 22). US-China Trade War Manufacturing Exodus Creating Boom Time for Chinese Logistics Companies. South China Morning Post.Google Scholar
  18. Hillman, J. (2018, January 25). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Hu, X. (2010, July 26). Exchange Rate Regime Reform and Monetary Policy Effectiveness. Beijing: People’s Bank of China.Google Scholar
  20. Kwan, C. H. (2018). Issues Facing Renminbi Internationalization: Observations from Chinese, Regional and Global Perspectives. Public Policy Review, 14(5). Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance, Japan.Google Scholar
  21. Łasak, P., & van der Linden, R. W. H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative in Tackling China’s Economic Slowdown and Its Financial Implications Within a Policy Trilemma Context, Chapter 12. In E. Gualandri, V. Venturelli, & A. Sclip (Eds.), Frontier Topics in Banking: Investigating New Trends and Recent Developments in the Financial Industry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. van der Linden, R. W. H. (2010). Bank Strategy, Governance and Ratings, Chapter 12. In P. Molyneux (Ed.), Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Lo, C. (2015). China’s Impossible Trinity: The Structural Challenges to the “Chinese Dream”. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. McBride, J., & Chatzky, A. (2019, May 3). Is “Made in China 2025” a Threat to Global Trade? Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  25. McMahon, M., Schipke, A., & Li, X. (2018). China’s Monetary Policy Communication: Frameworks, Impact, and Recommendations (IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/244).Google Scholar
  26. Morrison, W. M. (2018, February 5). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. Congressional Research Service 7-5700. www.crs.gov. RL33534.
  27. Mundell, R. A. (1960). The Monetary Dynamics of International Adjustment under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(2), 227–257.Google Scholar
  28. Reeves, M., & Hu, D. (2015, December 7). What China’s 13th Five-Year Plan Means for Business? Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  29. Shih, V. (2017, October 20). Financial Instability in China: Possible Pathways and Their Likelihood. Berlin: Mercator Institute for China Studies.Google Scholar
  30. The Economist. (2019a, March 16). China’s Current-Account Surplus Has Vanished.Google Scholar
  31. The Economist. (2019b, April 20). China’s GDP: Growth in Train.Google Scholar
  32. Tiffany, N. G., & Chung, K. (2018, July 17). Trade Conflict Between China and the United States and Its Impact on Hong Kong’s Economy. Research Office Information Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat.Google Scholar
  33. Windsor, C., & Halperin, D. (2018, September). RMB Internationalisation: Where to Next? Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin.Google Scholar
  34. Wong, D., & Koty, A. C. (2018, December 14). The US–China Trade War: A Timeline. China Briefing.Google Scholar
  35. WTO. (2018). World Trade Statistical Review 2018.Google Scholar
  36. Zhao, M. (2006, May). External Liberalization and the Evolution of China’s Exchange System: An Empirical Approach (World Bank China Office Research Working Paper No. 4).Google Scholar
  37. Zheng, Y., Yi, J., & Chen, M. (2007). Revaluation of the Chinese Currency and Its Impacts on China (China Policy Institute and Centre for Global Finance, Discussion Paper 24). University of Nottingham.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and Social CommunicationJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Business, Finance & MarketingThe Hague University of Applied SciencesThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations