Advertisement

Democratic Education and Compassion

  • Nuraan DavidsEmail author
  • Yusef Waghid
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyse compassion as an emotive action in relation to democratic education—by paying specific attention to the student–supervisor relationship in relation to doctoral studies. We commence by providing insights into the types of challenges doctoral students typically present during their studies—highlighting the reality that for many of them, the external constraints brought about through socio-economic constraints and political strife both at home in their host countries often outweigh the internal demands of doctoral studies. For this reason, we argue that doctoral supervision cannot be limited to a reliance on constructions of rational argumentation and analyses, but necessarily involves emotive interactions seeped in capacities for compassionate action. Drawing on the seminal ideas of Martha Nussbaum, we show, firstly, that compassion can be construed as an emotive judgement; secondly, acting compassionately is tantamount to recognising the vulnerabilities of others and to do something about changing unsatisfactory human conditions; and thirdly, compassionate action is about enhancing democratic relations among people that can cultivate human flourishing.

Keywords

Compassion Democratic iteration Human flourishing Human vulnerability 

References

  1. Altbach, P. 2013. Advancing the National and Global Knowledge Economy: The Role of Research Universities in Developing Countries. Studies in Higher Education 38 (3): 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grant, B.M. 2008. Agonistic Struggle: Master–Slave Dialogues in Humanities Supervision. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 7 (1): 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Henderson, E.F. 2018. Anticipating Doctoral Supervision: (Not) Bridging the Transition from Supervisee to Supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education 23 (4): 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Nussbaum, M.C. 1992. Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism. Political Theory 20 (2): 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1996. Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion. Social Philosophy and Policy 13: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 1997. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2002. Education for Citizenship in an Era of Global Connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (4/5): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2003. Compassion and terror. Daedalus 132 (1): 10–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education Policy StudiesStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations