Advertisement

Lurkers Versus Posters: Investigation of the Participation Behaviors in Online Learning Communities

  • Omid Reza Bolouki Speily
  • Alireza RezvanianEmail author
  • Ardalan Ghasemzadeh
  • Ali Mohammad Saghiri
  • S. Mehdi Vahidipour
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)

Abstract

Nowadays online learning communities (OLC) have been thought of as a great source of learning contents by many users in various areas such as online forums, question answering, and online social networks. Millions of posts are virally shared among different users in online social communities every day; however, different types of users deal with these posts in various ways in which, the users are divided into two categories: posters and lurkers. Lurker users join in an online community and watch other posts without performing any activities (or rarely activities). On the contrary, poster users actively participate in the creation and repost of information in online learning communities. The aim of this chapter is to investigate the lurking behaviors in educational networking or online communities in order to identify the factors influencing the participating behavior in such communities on social media. Therefore, first we introduce the role of online learning communities in educational networks and also present a bibliometric analysis. Then relevant theories and factors are reviewed, and a mathematical solution is proposed to increase the participation of learners in the transmission of information through reposting. The proposed solution encourage lurking learners to participate in content reposting. Comprehensive evaluations indicated that the proposed method had significantly solved the presented challenges.

Keywords

Participation behavior Social networks Online learning communities Asynchronous learning Lurkers Posters Information reposting 

Acronyms

EN

Educational networking

ESN

Educational social networks

ICT

Information and communications technology

OLC

Online learning communities

OSN

Online social network

SN

Social network

SNA

Social network analysis

SNS

Social networking site

UTG

Uses and gratifications theory

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was in part supported by a grant from IPM (No. CS1398-4-222).

References

  1. Adar, E., & Adamic, L. A. (2005). Tracking information epidemics in blogspace. Proceedings - 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2005, 2005, 207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1109/WI.2005.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Y. A., Ahmad, M. N., Ahmad, N., & Zakaria, N. H. (2019). Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 72–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), 9(1), 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, F., Castiglione, A., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., & Sperlì, G. (2017). Detection of lurkers in online social networks (pp. 1–15).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69471-9_1Google Scholar
  5. Amato, F., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Piccialli, F., & Sperlí, G. (2018). Centrality in heterogeneous social networks for lurkers detection: An approach based on hypergraphs. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30(3), e4188.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Gazit, T., Bar-Ilan, J., Perez, O., Aharony, N., Bronstein, J., et al. (2016). Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 268–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumer, E. P. S., Adams, P., Khovanskaya, V. D., Liao, T. C., Smith, M. E., Schwanda Sosik, V., et al. (2013). Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13 (p. 3257). New York, NY: ACM Press.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chris Brown, C. L. P. (2018). Networks for learning effective collaboration for teacher, school and system improvement. Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Chu, M., & Meulemans, Y. N. (2008). The problems and potential of MySpace and Facebook usage in academic libraries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 13(1), 69–85.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J136v13n01-04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cranefield, J., Yoong, P., & Huff, S. (2011). Beyond lurking: The invisible follower-feeder in an online community ecosystem. PACIS. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.232.3108&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  12. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Datu, J. A. D., Yang, W., Valdez, J. P. M., & Chu, S. K. W. (2018). Is facebook involvement associated with academic engagement among Filipino university students? A cross-sectional study. Computers & Education, 125, 246–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Boom, C., Van Canneyt, S., Bohez, S., Demeester, T., & Dhoedt, B. (2016). Learning semantic similarity for very short texts. In Proceedings - 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, ICDMW 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.86
  15. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers and Education, 68, 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center, 13(January), 18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). The internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers & Education, 134, 41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fricker, R. D. (2008). Sampling methods for web and E-mail surveys. In The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 195–217). London, UK: SAGE Publications.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gou, L., Zhang, X. (Luke), Chen, H. -H., Kim, J. -H., & Giles, C. L. (2010). Social network document ranking. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries - JCDL ’10 (pp. 313–322).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1816123.1816170
  20. Hamid, S., Bukhari, S., Ravana, S. D., Norman, A. A., & Ijab, M. T. (2016). Role of social media in information-seeking behaviour of international students. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(5), 643–666.  https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2016-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haythornthwaite, C. (2019). Learning, connectivity and networks. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 19–38.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurtubise, K., Pratte, G., Rivard, L., Berbari, J., Héguy, L., & Camden, C. (2017). Exploring engagement in a virtual community of practice in pediatric rehabilitation: Who are non-users, lurkers, and posters? Disability and Rehabilitation, 41, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1416496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ip, E. J., Barnett, M. J., Tenerowicz, M. J., & Perry, P. J. (2010). The touro 12-step: A systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards. Journal of Medical Internet Research., 12, e16.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 723–747.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00033.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers and Education, 58(1), 162–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2017). Social presence and transactional distance as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual learning communities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(6), 844–864.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116688319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kate Merry, S., & Simon, A. (2012). Living and lurking on LiveJournal. ASLIB Proceedings, 64(3), 241–261.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211244527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 487–510.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9120-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kilner, P. G., & Hoadley, C. M. (2005). Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 272–280).  https://doi.org/10.3115/1149293.1149328
  30. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.  https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.10kolCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambić, D. (2016). Correlation between Facebook use for educational purposes and academic performance of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2009). Ranking user-created contents by search user’s inclination in online communities. In Search (pp. 1215–1216). Spain: Madrid.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1526709.1526935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, Y. -L., Chen, F. -C., & Jiang, H. -M. (2006). Lurking as participation: A community perspective on lurkers’ identity and negotiability. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 404–410). USA: Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  34. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L., & Huberman, B. (2007). The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1(1), 1–39.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1232722.1232727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 115, 153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Oxford, UK: Harpers.Google Scholar
  38. Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43, 46–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-006-5985-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000). Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on …, 2(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. AMCIS 2001 Proceedings (pp. 1–10). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1733&context=amcis2001
  43. Owusu, G. M. Y., Bekoe, R. A., Otoo, D. S., & Koli, A. P. E. (2019). Adoption of social networking sites for educational use. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 2–19.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2018-0069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petrič, G., & Petrovčič, A. (2014). Elements of the management of norms and their effects on the sense of virtual community. Online Information Review, 38(3), 436–454.  https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2013-0083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rehm, M., Mulder, R. H., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2016). The impact of hierarchical positions on the type of communication within online communities of learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rezvanian, A., Moradabadi, B., Ghavipour, M., Daliri Khomami, M. M., & Meybodi, M. R. (2019). Learning automata approach for social networks (Vol. 820). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10767-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2006). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), 00–00.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarma, A. D., & Panigrahy, R. (2010). Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums categories and subject descriptors. Human Factors, 1, 21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider, A., Von Krogh, G., & Jäger, P. (2013). What’s coming next? Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 293–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shafipour, R., Baten, R. A., Hasan, M. K., Ghoshal, G., Mateos, G., & Hoque, M. E. (2018). Buildup of speaking skills in an online learning community: A network-analytic exploration. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 63.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0116-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharma, P., & Land, S. (2018). Patterns of knowledge sharing in an online affinity space for diabetes. Educational Technology Research and Development., 67, 247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9609-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shi, Z., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2014). Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: Evidence from Twitter. Mis Quarterly, 38(1), 123–142.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2341243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sloep, P. B., & Kester, L. (2009). From lurker to active participant. In Learning network services for professional development (pp. 17–26). Berlin, Germany: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00978-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Statista. (2019). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 4th quarter 2018. Statista.Com.Google Scholar
  56. Sun, N., Rau, P. P. L., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tagarelli, A., & Interdonato, R. (2018). Mining lurkers in online social networks: Principles, models, and computational methods. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00229-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N. (2003). The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Group, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1145/958160.958162
  59. Tang, X., Miao, Q., Quan, Y., Tang, J., & Deng, K. (2015). Predicting individual retweet behavior by user similarity: A multi-task learning approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 681–688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner, R. (2011). Social media tools for teaching and learning. Athletic Training Education Journal, 6(1), 51–52. Retrieved from http://csaweb109v.csa.com.ezproxy.lib.vt.edu:8080/ids70/view_record.php?id=4&recnum=41&log=from_res&SID=75pketf4eo60ftu6gurarhq7h4Google Scholar
  63. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2011). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang, W., Duan, L., Koul, A., & Sheth, A. (2014). YouRank: Let user engagement rank microblog search results. In 8th Internationl AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved from http://knoesis.org/library/resource.php?id=1979
  65. Welser, H. T., Khan, M. L., & Dickard, M. (2019). Digital remediation: Social support and online learning communities can help offset rural digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 22, 717–723.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, J. N., Van Patten, B., & Williams, J. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 213–230). Routledge, USA: Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  67. Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., Chen, N.-S., & Miao, Q. (2016). Effects of online presence on learning performance in a blog-based online course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang, X., Li, G., & Huang, S. S. (2017). Perceived online community support, member relations, and commitment: Differences between posters and lurkers. Information & Management, 54(2), 154–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yeow, A., Johnson, S., & Faraj, S. (2006). Lurking: Legitimate or illegitimate peripheral? In ICIS 2006 (p. 62). USA: Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  70. Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yuan, Y. C., & Gay, G. (2006). Homophily of network ties and bonding and bridging social capital in computer-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 1062–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00308.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang, H., Zhao, Q., Liu, H., Xiao, K., He, J., Du, X., & Chen, H. (2012). Predicting retweet behavior in Weibo social network. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7651 LNCS, pp. 737–743).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35063-4_60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omid Reza Bolouki Speily
    • 1
  • Alireza Rezvanian
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Ardalan Ghasemzadeh
    • 1
  • Ali Mohammad Saghiri
    • 3
  • S. Mehdi Vahidipour
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Information Technology and Computer EngineeringUrmia University of TechnologyUrmiaIran
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringUniversity of Science and CultureTehranIran
  3. 3.School of Computer Science, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM)TehranIran
  4. 4.Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of ComputerUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations