• Roxana D. Maiorescu-MurphyEmail author


This chapter discusses the purpose of this study and its relevance within the fields of business and communication. It tackles past literature on diversity and explains the gaps that the analysis aims to fill. Finally, the chapter discusses the methodology used for this purpose and provides a preview of the forthcoming chapters.


  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcadipani, R., & de Oliveira Medeiros, C. R. (2019). When corporations cause harm: A critical view of corporate social irresponsibility and corporate crimes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–13.Google Scholar
  3. Ashikali, T., & Groeneveld, S. (2015). Diversity management in public organizations and its effect on employees’ affective commitment: The role of transformational leadership and the inclusiveness of the organizational culture. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 146–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Associated Press. (2018, April 5). Ex-Ford employee awarded $17 million in discrimination case. New York Post. Retrieved from
  5. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2014). From “smart objects” to “social objects”: The next evolutionary step of the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(1), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, D. T., & Kelan, E. K. (2018). HRM practices to diversity management: Individualization, precariousness and precarity. In D. G. Collings, G. T. Wood, & L. T. Szamosi (Eds.), Human resource management; a critical approach (pp. 117–134). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Surfing alone? The Internet and social capital: Evidence from an unforeseeable technological mistake. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloomberg. (2018, September 17). IBM is being sued for age discrimination. Fortune. Retrieved from
  10. Bouchillon, B. C. (2014). Social ties and generalized trust, online and in person: Contact or conflict—the mediating role of bonding social capital in America. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 506–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouchillon, B. C. (2018). Patching the melting pot: Sociability in Facebook groups for engagement, trust, and perceptions of difference. Social Science Computer Review. Scholar
  12. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brammer, S., He, H., & Mellahi, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, employee organizational identification, and creative effort: The moderating impact of corporate ability. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 323–352.Google Scholar
  14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, A. F. (2018, August 15). Why the gender discrimination lawsuit against Nike is so significant. Vox. Retrieved from
  16. Carlson, J., Wyllie, J., Rahman, M. M., & Voola, R. (2019). Enhancing brand relationship performance through customer participation and value creation in social media brand communities. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christian, J., Porter, L. W., & Moffitt, G. (2006). Workplace diversity and group relations: An overview. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung, N., Nam, K., & Koo, C. (2016). Examining information sharing in social networking communities: Applying theories of social capital and attachment. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ciszek, E. (2019/in press). “We are people, not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review. DOI
  20. Clark, M., Black, H. G., & Judson, K. (2017). Brand community integration and satisfaction with social media sites: A comparative study. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 11(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. US Census Bureau, 9, 1–13. Retrieved from
  22. Dass, S., Sethi, R., Popli, S., & Saxena, V. N. (2019, in press). Drivers of brand engagement: The role of brand communities. Global Business Review.
  23. Deetz, S. A. (2004). Critical theory. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. (2016). Boomerang politics: How transnational stakeholders impact multinational corporations in the context of globalization. In A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility (pp. 321–338). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7). Retrieved from
  26. Downey, S. N., van der Werff, L., Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2015). The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Egan, M. L., & Bendick Jr., M. (2003). Workforce diversity initiatives of U.S. multinational corporations in Europe. Thunderbird International Review, 46(6), 701–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Einwiller, A. A., & Steilen, S. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites- An analysis of complaints and complaints responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review, 41, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fairfield, M. (2018). The ground for inclusion: Diversity and interdependence. Gestalt Journal of Australia and New Zealand, 14(2), 19–44.Google Scholar
  30. Ferdman, B. M. (2018). Incorporating diversity and inclusion as core values in organization development practice. In D. W. Jamieson, A. H. Church, & J. D. Vogelsang (Eds.), Enacting values-based change: Organization development in action (pp. 157–167). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Forbes Couching Council. (2018, February 27). Here comes Gen Z: How to attract and retain the workforce’s newest generation. Forbes. Retrieved from
  32. Grabowicz, P. A., Aiello, L. M., Eguíluz, V. M., & Jaimes, A. (2013). Distinguishing topical and social groups based on common identity and bond theory. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 627–636). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Hayashi, M. (2016). Diversity in international policy on educational equity and inclusion of social groups: A case of 77 state parties to the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 27. Retrieved from
  34. Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Grewal, D., Wulf, J., & Schoegel, M. (2019). Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knights, D., & Omanović, V. (2016). (Mis) managing diversity: Exploring the dangers of diversity management orthodoxy. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Korschun, D., & Du, S. (2013). How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1494–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kulik, C. T. (2014). Working below and above the line: The research–practice gap in diversity Management. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, D., Kirkpatrick-Husk, K., & Madhavan, R. (2017). Diversity in alliance portfolios and performance outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1472–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lima, V. M., Irigaray, H. A. R., & Lourenco, C. (2019). Consumer engagement on social media: Insights from a virtual brand community. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 22(1), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu, L., Liu, R., Lee, M., & Chen, J. (2019). When will consumers be ready? A psychological perspective on consumer engagement in social media brand communities. Internet Research, 29 (4), 704–724.Google Scholar
  44. Liu, W., Son, M., Wenzel, A., An, Z., Zhao Martin, N., Nah, S., et al. (2018). Bridging mechanisms in multiethnic communities: Place-based communication, neighborhood belonging, and intergroup relations. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Madera, J. M. (2013). Best practices in diversity management in customer service Organizations: An investigation of top companies cited by Diversity Inc. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–3365.Google Scholar
  47. Maiorescu, R. (2013). Blogging at Mercedes-Benz. A mixed-method approach to assess corporate identity convergence in online settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Purdue University, West-Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  48. Maiorescu, R. D., & Wrigley, B. J. (2016). Diversity in multinational corporations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Matei, S. A., & Bruno, R. J. (2015). Pareto’s 80/20 law and social differentiation: A social entropy perspective. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mazzei, A., & Ravazzani, S. (2008, January 25–26). Leveraging differences for competition: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the 7th international congress on marketing trends. Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  51. McKee, M., Steele, S., & Stuckler, D. (2019). The hidden power of corporations. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Retrieved from
  52. McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (2015). Communication models for the study of mass communications. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). Inclusion is the key to diversity management, but what is Inclusion? Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 39(2), 83–88.Google Scholar
  54. Mundy, D. E. (2015). Diversity 2.0: How the public relation function can take the lead in a new generation of diversity and inclusion (DandI) initiative. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 2(2), 1–35.Google Scholar
  55. Mundy, D. E. (2016). Bridging the divide: A multidisciplinary analysis of diversity research and the implications for public relations. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 3(1). Retrieved from
  56. Nitins, T., & Burgess, J. (2014). Twitter, brands, and user engagement. In Twitter and society (Vol. 89, pp. 293–304). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  57. Ozturk, M. B., & Tatli, A. (2016). Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: broadening diversity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8), 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Poulis, K., & Poulis, E. (2016). Problematizing fit and survival: transforming the law of requisite variety through complexity misalignment. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rachele, J. S. (2017). Dismantling diversity management: Introducing an ethical performance improvement campaign. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., et al. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Read, W., Robertson, N., McQuilken, L., & Ferdous, A. S. (2019, in press). Consumer engagement on Twitter: Perceptions of the brand matter. European Journal of Marketing. Scholar
  63. Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L. G., Kiesler, S. B., Riedl, J., et al. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberge, M.-E., Lewicki, R. J., Hietapelto, A., & Abdyldaeva, A. (2011). From theory to practice: Recommending supportive diversity practices. Journal of Diversity Management, 6(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruggs, E. N., Walker, S. S., Blanchard, A., & Gur, S. (2016). Online exclusion: Biases that may arise when using social media in talent acquisition. In Social Media in Employee Selection and Recruitment (pp. 289–305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Schwabenland, C., & Tomlinson, F. (2015). Shadows and light: Diversity management as Phantasmagoria. Human Relations, 68(12), 1913–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shoobridge, G. E. (2006). Multi-ethnic workforce and business performance: Review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 92–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Singh, V., & Point, S. (2004). Strategic responses by European companies to the diversity challenge: An online comparison. Long Range Planning, 37, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Snyder, D. G., & Newman, K. P. (2019). Reducing consumer loneliness through brand communities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(2), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Yang, A. (2018). Notes on a dialogue: Twenty years of digital dialogic communication research in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2019). The global public relations handbook. Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Stevens, R., Gilliard-Matthews, S., Dunaev, J., Woods, M. K., & Brawner, B. M. (2017). The digital hood: Social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media & Society, 19(6), 950–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swanson, D. R. (2002). Diversity programs: Attitude and realities in the contemporary corporate environment. Corporate Communications, 7(4), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tausczik, Y. R., Dabbish, L. A., & Kraut, R. E. (2014). Building loyalty to online communities through bond and identity-based attachment to sub-groups. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 146–157). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  76. Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2015). Diversity and inclusion in different work settings: Emerging patterns, challenges, and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 54, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trittin, H., & Schoeneborn, D. (2017). Diversity as polyphony: Reconceptualizing diversity management from a communication-centered perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2019). EEOC releases fiscal year 2018 enforcement and litigation data. Retrieved from
  80. Uysal, N. (2013). Shifting the paradigm: Diversity communication on corporate web sites. Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 8–36.Google Scholar
  81. Vespa, J., Armstrong, D. M., & Medina, L. (2018). Demographic turning points for the United States: Population projections for 2020 to 2060. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  82. Weinberger, D. (2011). The hyperlinked organization. In R. Levine, C. Locke, D. Searls, & D. Weinberger (Eds.), The cluetrain manifesto. Tenth anniversary edition (pp. 187–205). New York: Perseus Books Groups.Google Scholar
  83. Wieczner, J. (2017, June 7). The Fortune 500s 10 most profitable companies. Fortune. Retrieved from
  84. Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Mazei, J., & Morner, M. (2017). The paradox of diversity initiatives: When organizational needs differ from employee preferences. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wondrak, M., & Segert, A. (2015). Using the Diversity Impact Navigator to move from interventions towards diversity management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wrench, J. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Institute of Race Relations, 46(3), 73–84.Google Scholar
  87. Yu, B., Ren, Y., Terveen, L., & Zhu, H. (2017). Predicting member productivity and withdrawal from pre-joining attachments in online production groups. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1775–1784). New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emerson CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations