Advertisement

A Machine Learning Based Method for Coexistence State Prediction in Multiple Wireless Body Area Networks

  • Yongmei SunEmail author
  • Tingshuo Chen
  • Jingxian Wang
  • Yuefeng Ji
Conference paper
  • 35 Downloads
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

The coexistence problem occurs when a wireless body area network (WBAN) is close to other WBANs. The degraded communication performance may even threaten people’s life for medical applications. Therefore, a reliable method for coexistence state prediction is required to ensure this problem could be detected and handled in time. This chapter presents a machine learning based method for coexistence state prediction, in which decision tree (DT) and naive Bayes classifier (NBC) are considered as supervised learning methods. Firstly, the average packet error rate (PER) and other 11 features extracted from signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR), which have less computational cost, are selected and improved to reflect human relative movement and interference strength for feature extraction. Then, a set of models based on DT and NBC are generated with various configurations of different features, the number of continuous SINRs and the decision function. Finally, all models are compared and the best one is selected for state prediction. In the experiment, the data for training and testing is collected by CC2530 2.4 GHz low-power transceivers. Simulation results show that, compared with NBC based method, the proposed method is better in terms of accuracy and timeliness.

Keywords

Wireless body area network Coexistence state prediction Machine learning Feature extraction 

References

  1. 1.
    Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., Verdone, R.: A survey on wireless body area networks: technologies and design challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 16(3), 1635–1657 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, J.X., Sun, Y.M., Ji, Y.F.: QoS-based adaptive power control scheme for co-located WBANs: a cooperative bargaining game theoretic perspective. Wirel. Netw. 2017(3), 1–11 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farhadi, H.: Coordinated Transmission for Wireless Interference Networks. Ph.D. thesis, KTH, 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pang, Q., Leung, V.C.M.: Channel clustering and probabilistic channel visiting techniques for WLAN interference mitigation in Bluetooth devices. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 49(4), 914–923 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villegas, E. G., Lopez-Aguilera, E., Vidal, R., Paradells, J.: Effect of adjacent-channel interference in IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In: International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications 2007, Crowncom, pp. 118–125. IEEE, Orlando, (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Won, C., Youn, J. H., Ali, H., Sharif, H., Deogun, J.: Adaptive radio channel allocation for supporting coexistence of 802.15.4 and 802.11b. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005, VTC-2005-Fall, vol. 4, pp. 2522–2526. IEEE, Dallas (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon, D. G., Shin, S. Y., Kwon, W. H., Hong, S. P.: Packet error rate analysis of IEEE 802.11b under IEEE 802.15.4 interference. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2006, VTC-2006-Spring, vol. 90, pp. 1186–1190. IEEE, Melbourne (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deylami, M., Jovanov, E.: Performance analysis of coexisting IEEE 802.15.4-based health monitoring WBANs. In: International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012, EMBC, vol. 2012, pp. 2464. IEEE, San Diego (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kazemi, R., Vesilo, R., Dutkiewicz, E.: A novel genetic-fuzzy power controller with feedback for interference mitigation in wireless body area networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2011, VTC-2011-Spring, pp. 1–5. IEEE, Yokohama (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanlen, L.W., Miniutti, D., Smith, D., Rodda, D., Gilbert, B.: Co-channel interference in body area networks with indoor measurements at 2.4GHz: distance-to-interferer is a poor estimate of received interference power. Int. J. Wireless Inf. Networks. 17(3–4), 113–125 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Archasantisuk, S., Aoyagi, T.: The human movement identification using the radio signal strength in WBAN. In: International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology, ISMICT, vol. 40, pp. 59–63. IEEE, Kamakura (2015)
  12. 12.
    Kazemi, R., Vesilo, R., Dutkiewicz, E., Liu, R.: Dynamic power control in Wireless Body Area Networks using reinforcement learning with approximation. In: International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, vol. 6613, pp. 2203–2208. IEEE, Toronto (2012)
  13. 13.
    Kazemi, R., Vesilo, R., Dutkiewicz, E., Liu, R. P.: Design considerations of reinforcement learning power controllers in Wireless Body Area Networks. In: International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, pp. 2030–2036. IEEE, Toronto (2012)
  14. 14.
    Kathuria, M., Gambhir, S.: Leveraging machine learning for optimize predictive classification and scheduling E-health traffic. Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering. 2014, 1–7 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paschalidis, I. C., Dai, W. Y., Guo, D., Lin, Y. W., Li, K. Y., Li, B. B.: Posture detection with body area networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks 2011, BodyNets, pp. 27–33. ACM, Palmerston (2011)
  16. 16.
    Han, Y., Jin, Z., Cho, J., Kim, T. S.: A prediction algorithm for coexistence problem in multiple WBANs environment. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, ICUIMC, vol. 2015, pp. 68. ACM, Siem Reap (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Induction on decision tree. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 1(2), 127 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks - Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks, 1–271 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Veer, K., Sharma, T.: A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 40(4), 149–154 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meinshausen, N., Bühlmann, P.: Stability selection. J. R. Stat. Soc. 72(4), 417–473 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roy, S.V., Quitin, F., Liu, L.F., Oestges, C., Horlin, F., Dricot, J.M., Doncker, P.D.: Dynamic channel modeling for multi-sensor body area networks. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61(4), 2200–2208 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yongmei Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tingshuo Chen
    • 1
  • Jingxian Wang
    • 1
  • Yuefeng Ji
    • 1
  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical CommunicationsBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations