Advertisement

Nanomaterials-Enabled Lightweight Military Platforms

  • Narendra Kumar
  • Ambesh Dixit
Chapter

Abstract

Most of the military platforms are constructed from high-density steel. Such platforms are heavy, thereby suffering from high fuel consumption, low maneuverability, and load-carrying capacity. In addition, the armor used to protect such platforms from ballistic and blast attacks is also made out of high-density materials. Low-density and high-strength materials are being sought to overcome the inherent issues in such platforms. Low-density metal alloys and composites have been developed and found to partially or fully replace high-density steel in many of the naval, ground, and aerospace-based military platforms. The problem, however, is not fully resolved. Nanomaterials such as CNTs, graphene, metals, and ceramics in metal alloys and composites are reported to further reduce the weight penalty in military platforms and their armor.

Keywords

Light weight military platforms Trucks Tanks Armed Personal Carriers Aircrafts Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), Structural Nanocomposites Transparent Armor Blast Protecting Armor Syntactic Metal Foam 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    L. Catherine Brinson, Chair, Application of Lightweighting Technology to Military Aircraft, Vessels, and Vehicles (The National Academies Pres, Washington, D.C. 2012). doi:  https://doi.org/10.17226/13277
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Advanced Materials by Design, OTA-E-351 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1988). https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk2/1988/8801/8801.PDFGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Rana, Low-density steels. J. Minerals, Metals Mater. Soc. (TMS) 66, 1730–1733 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. J. McPherson, Chairman, Materials for Lightweight Military Combat Vehicles, National Materials Advisory Board Publication, NMAB-396 (National Academic Press, Washington, D.C. 1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Tillmann, E. Vogli, Selecting surface-treatment technologies, Chapter1, in Modern Surface Technology, ed. by F.-W. Bach, A. Laarmann, T. Wenz, (WILEY-VCH, 2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    P. Rambabu, V.V. Kutumbarao, R.J.H. Wanhill, Alluminium alloys for aerspace applications, Chapter 2, in Aerospace Materials and Materials Technologies, ed. by N. E. Prasad, R. J. H. Wanhill, (Springer Science, Singapore, 2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    E.A. Strake Jr., J.T. Staley, Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 32, 131–1172 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    R.R. Boyer, Attributes, characteristics, and applications of titanium and its alloys. JOM 62(5), 35–43 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    M. McLean, Nickel-based alloys: Recent developments for the aero-gas turbine, in High Performance Materials in Aerospace, ed. by H. M. Flower, (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995), pp. 135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    C. Soutis, Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41, 143–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R.-M. Wang, S.R. Zhang, Y.-P. Zhang, Polymer Matrix Composites and Technology (Woodhard Publishing, UK, 2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    F. C. Campbell (ed.), Introduction and Uses of Lightweight Materials in Lightweight Materials—Understanding the Basics (ASM International, USA, 2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    R. Bielawski, Composite materials in military aviation and selected problems with implementation. Rev. Air Force Acad. (Poland) 1(33) (2017)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. P. Mouritz, Structural materials of AV8B and V-22 aircrafts chapter in Introduction to Aerospace Materials, Elsevier (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    G. Neşer, Polymer based composites in marine use: History and future trends. Procedia Eng. 194, 19–24 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. Hopkins, H. Saleh, G. Jewell, Composite riser study confirms weight, fatigue benefits compared with steel. Offshore Mag. 75(9) (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A.P. Mouritz, E. Gellrt, P. Burchill, K. Challis, Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos. Struct. 53, 21–41 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.
    G.F. Wilhelmi, W.M. Appleman, F.T.C. Loo, Composite shafting for naval propulsion systems. Nav. Eng. J. 98, 129–136 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    N. Kumar, S. Kumbhat, Chapter 7, Nanocomposites, Essentials in Nanoscience & Nanotechnology (Wiley, USA, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    F. Hussain, M. Hojjati, M. Okamoto, R.E. Gorga, Polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: An overview. J. Compos. Mater. 40(17), 1511–1565 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.P. Salvetat, G. Andrew, D. Briggs, T.M. Bonard, R.R. Basca, A. Kulik, J. Phys Rev. Lett. 82, 944 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Morgan, Mater. Matters 2(1), 20 (2007)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    J. Cho, I.M. Daniel, Reinforcement of carbon/epoxy composites with multi-wall carbon nanotubes and dispersion enhancing block copolymers. ScriptaMaterialia 58, 533 (2008)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    A. Stan, I. Dinca, C. Ban, S. Ilina, D. Donescu, H. Paven, L. Dumitrache, L. Gavrila, I. Voicu, Epoxy- layered silicate and epoxy MWCNTs nanocomposites. Appl. Mech. Mater. 146, 160–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
  57. 57.
    P.K. Rohatgi, B. Schultz, Lightweight metal matrix nanocomposites – stretching the boundaries of metals. Mater. Matters 2.4 16 (2007)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    S. Rujian, G. Yingchun, Z. Ying, Development of anti-corrosion processing on magnetisum alloys. Mod. Chem. Appl. 3, 1000153 (2015)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
  60. 60.
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.
    Lightweight land-based vehicles, chapter 4, in Application of Light Weighting Technology to Military Aircrafts, Vessels, and Vehicles, (The National Academic Press, USA, 2010), pp. 85–148; https://www.nap.edu/read/13277/chapter/6
  64. 64.
    D. Lenihan, W. Ronan, P.E. O’Donoghue, S.B. Leen, A review of the integrity of metallic vehicle armour to projectile attack. Proc IMechE Part L: J Mater.: Des. Appl., 1–22 (2018)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    R.M. Gamache, C.B. Giller, G. Montella, D. Fragiadakis, C.M. Roland, Elastomer-metal laminate armor. Mater. Des. 111, 362–368 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    R.A. Meyers, Dynamic Behavior of Materials (Wiley, USA, 1994), pp. 597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
  68. 68.
  69. 69.
    Lightweight protection materials: Ceramics, plymers, and metals, Chapter 6, in Application of Light Weighting Technology to Military Aircrafts, Vessels, and Vehicles, (The National Academic Press, USA, 2010), pp. 69–156; https://www.nap.edu/read/13157/chapter/7
  70. 70.
    S.L. Rovner, 21st-Century Armor, The increasingly sophisticated successor to an ancient material—ceramic—is saving lives on today’s battlefields. Chem. Eng. News 87, 51–53 (2009).; http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/87/8730sci1htmlGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
  72. 72.
    Q.H. Shah, Strain rate effecton the failure strain and hardness of metallic armor plates subjected to high velocity projectile impact. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 1, 166–175 (2006)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
  74. 74.
  75. 75.
    V.T. Rathod, J.S. Kumar, A. Jain, Polymer and ceramic nanocomposites for aerospace applications. Appl. Nanosci. 7, 519–548 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    L. Wang, Preparation and sintering behaviour of alumina powder by ammonia precipitation method. MATEC Web Conf. 109, 02002 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    M. Grujicic, W.C. Bell, S.B. Biggers, K.L. Koudela, J.F. Tarter, B.A. Cheesman, The effect of a carbon-nanotube forest-mat strike face on the ballistic-protection performance of E-glass reinforced polyvinyl-ester-epoxy composite armour. J. Mater.: Design Appl. 222 Part L, 15–27 (2008). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.599.2687&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
  79. 79.
    I.A. Ovid’ko, Metal-graphene nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical properties: a review. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 38, 190–200 (2014)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    J. Wang, Z. Li, G. Fan, H. Pan, Z. Chen, D. Zhang, Reinforcement with graphene nanosheets in aluminium matrix composites. ScriptaMaterialia 66, 594–597 (2012)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    L.-Y.Chen, H. Konishi, A. Fehrenbacher, C. Ma, G.-Q Hu, H. Choi, H.-F. Hu, F.E. Pfefferkorn, X.-C. Li, Novel nanoprocessing route for bulk graphene nanoplatelets reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites, ScriptaMaterialia, 67, 29–32, (2012)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
  83. 83.
  84. 84.
    D. T. Haven, Advanced Optical Materials For Use In Protective Windows And Transparent Armor, Phonotonicsonline Magzine article, August 2017, https://www.photonicsonline.com/doc/advanced-optical-materials-for-use-in-protective-windows-and-transparent-armor-0001
  85. 85.
    P.J. Patel, G.A. Gilde, P.G. Dehmer, J.W. McCauley, Transparent armor. AMPTIAC 4, 1–13 (2000)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    James M. Sands and James W. McCauley, ARL-SR-0164, 50th Anniversary Celebration: 46th Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference on Advances and Needs in Multi-spectral Transparent Materials Technology. Jul (2008)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    R. Klement, S. Rolc, R. Mikulikova, J. Krestan, Transparent armour materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 1091–1095 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    E. P. Carton and J. P. F. Broos, Innovative Transparent Armour Concepts, 26th International Symposium on Ballistics, Miami, Fl, September 12–16 (2011)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
  90. 90.
  91. 91.
  92. 92.
  93. 93.
    D. O. Dusenberry, Handbook for blast resistant design of buildings, 176, [2010]& Ph.D. Thesis titled “Influence of Transverse Reinforcement on Bridge Column Resistance against Blast Loads” by Amir Hossein Kavousifard, Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2018)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    N. Gardner, E. Wang, P. Kumar, A. Shukla, Blast mitigation in a sandwich composite using graded core and polyurea interlayer. Exp. Mech. (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9517-9
  95. 95.
    S. Yang, C. Qi, Blast-resistant improvement of sandwich armor structure with aluminum foam composite. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 947571 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/947571
  96. 96.
  97. 97.
    L. Sun, R.F. Gibson, F. Gordaninejad, J. Suhr, Energy absorption capability of nanocomposites: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 2392–2409 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    M. Drdlová, V. Pracha, High strain rate characteristics of nanoparticle modified blast energy absorbing materials. Procedia Eng. 151, 214–221 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narendra Kumar
    • 1
  • Ambesh Dixit
    • 2
  1. 1.Defence Laboratory Jodhpur (DRDO)JodhpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Physics & Center for Solar Energy DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations