Advertisement

Fostering Knowledge Sharing Via Technology: A Case Study of Collaborative Learning Using Padlet

  • Daniela FrisonEmail author
  • Concetta Tino
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 8)

Abstract

The chapter describes a collaborative learning experience in higher education carried out through the use of the Additional Collaborative Tool Padlet. The study refers to a master course focused on Organizational Development and based on the EMI—English as a Medium of Instruction methodology. Starting from a focus on collaborative learning strategies literature and the proposal of Additional Collaborative Tool in Higher Education, the chapter presents the design process of an online activity based on the use of Padlet, an online whiteboard that offers space for multiple participants to collaborate in real time. Students’ feedback about the Padlet experience has been collected and analyzed (The Organizational development. Teaching and learning methods course was jointly conducted by Prof. Monica Fedeli, University of Padua, and Prof. Laura Bierema, Georgia State University. The authors, Daniela Frison and Concetta Tino, jointly led the online activities and conceived of the presented idea. Daniela Frison led the design of the study and edited Sects. 4 and 5. Concetta Tino edited Sect. 1. The authors jointly discussed the results and edited Sects. 2, 3, and 6.).

Keywords

Additional Collaborative Tool EMI Collaborative learning Padlet Higher education 

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugente, Oregon/Arlington, Virginia: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  4. Bligh, D. (2000). What’s the point in discussion? Exeter, UK: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  5. Brookfield, S. D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco, US: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
  7. Brusasco, P. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: An introduction. RiCOGNIZIONI. Rivista di Lingue e Letterature straniere e Culture moderne, 2(4), 109–110.Google Scholar
  8. Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 3–6.Google Scholar
  9. Coryell, J. E., Fedeli, M., Frison, D., & Tyner, J. (2015). Teaching internationally divers students: An international comparative study of faculty development during higher education internationalization. ICERI 2015 Proceedings (pp. 311–320).Google Scholar
  10. Dewitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 89–101.Google Scholar
  11. Dewitt, D., Alias, A., Siraj, S., & Zakaria, A. R. (2014). Interactions in online forums: A case study among first-year undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education, 2(1), 6–13.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2012). Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socioeconomic outcomes. Strasbourg: European Commission. Online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1389776578033&uri=CELEX:52012DC0669
  13. European Union. (2013). Modernisation of higher education. Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
  14. Eurydice. (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Online: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/Eurydice/documents/key_data_series/143EN.pdf
  15. Fedeli, M. (2016). Coinvolgere gli studenti nelle pratiche didattiche: potere, dialogo, partecipazione. In M. Fedeli, V. Grion, & D. Frison (Eds.), Coinvolgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione (pp. 133–142). Lecce, IT: Pensa Multimedia.Google Scholar
  16. Grion, V. (2016). Assessment for Learning all’università: uno strumento per modernizzare la formazione. In M. Fedeli, V. Grion, & D. Frison (Eds.), Coinvolgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione (pp. 289–317). Lecce, IT: Pensa Multimedia.Google Scholar
  17. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, W. R. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, W. R., Chung, T. R., & Haney, M. H. (2008). Knowledge management and organizational learning. Omega, 36(2), 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kuo, F. R., Hwang, G. J., Chen, S. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2012). A cognitive apprenticeship approach to facilitating web-based collaborative problem solving. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 319–331.Google Scholar
  22. Mallon, M., & Bernsten, S. (2015, Winter). Collaborative learning technologies. Tips and trends. Chicago, IL: ACRL American Library Association.Google Scholar
  23. Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pasher, E., & Ronen, T. (2011). The complete guide to knowledge management. A strategic plan to leverage your company’s intellectual capital. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  25. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seralidou, E., & Douligeris, C. (2015). Identification and classification of educational collaborative learning environments. Procedia Computer Science, 65, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, X., Gao, Y., Yan, X., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., Sun, Y., & Cao, X. (2015). From e-learning to social-learning: Mapping development of studies on social media-supported knowledge management. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(2015), 803–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.University of PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations