Advertisement

Geometric Degrees of Freedom and Non-conventional Spatial Structural Forms

  • Masoud AkbarzadehEmail author
  • Márton Hablicsek
Conference paper
  • 501 Downloads

Abstract

This paper expands on the Geometric Degrees of Freedom (GDoF) in the context of geometry-based structural form finding and emphasizes its importance in finding non-conventional architectural structures in three-dimensional space. Using GDoF allows a designer to find various iterations of a network, each representing a unique design within the state of equilibrium and explore the non-conventional solutions particularly for funicular polyhedrons of 3D graphic statics. The paper briefly explains a method to find the GDoF of a given network consisting of closed polygons in 2D or 3D and applies the same method in finding the GDoF of reciprocal polyhedral diagrams of 3D graphic statics and expands on their non-trivial geometric transformations with their planarity constraints. The paper goes beyond the GDoF and provides a method to parameterize all the members of a network by assigning weights to all edges in a network to control the design properties of the solutions. For instance, a synclastic, compression-only shell can turn into an anticlastic compression-and-tension combined shell with the same magnitude of internal forces and external loads reciprocal to the same force distribution/diagram (Fig. 1). Using this technique in the context of 3D graphic statics allows a designer to find non-conventional spatial structural solutions with both compression and tension members with planar faces for architectural/structural design purposes.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Danish National Research Foundation through the Centre for Symmetry and Deformation (DNRF92).

References

  1. 1.
    Akbarzadeh, M.: 3D graphic statics using polyhedral reciprocal diagrams. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akbarzadeh, M., Hablicsek, M., Guo, Y.: Developing algebraic constraints for reciprocal polyhedral diagrams of 3D graphic statics. In: Proceedings of the IASS Symposium 2018, Creativity in Structural Design, 16–20 July 2018. MIT, Boston, USA (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akbarzadeh, M., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: Compression-only form finding through finite subdivision of the external force polygon. In: Obrebski, J.B., Tarczewski, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the IASS-SLTE Symposium 2014, Brasilia, Brazil (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akbarzadeh, M., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: On the equilibrium of funicular polyhedral frames and convex polyhedral force diagrams. Comput.-Aided Des. 63, 118–128 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akbarzadeh, M., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: Spatial compression-only form finding through subdivision of external force polyhedron. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Amsterdam, August 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker, W.F., Beghini, L.L., Mazurek, A., Carrion, J., Beghini, A.: Maxwell’s reciprocal diagrams and discrete michell frames. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 48, 267–277 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beghini, A., Beghini, L.L., Schultz, J.A., Carrion, J., Baker, W.F.: Rankine’s theorem for the design of cable structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 48, 877–892 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Block, P.: Thrust network analysis: exploring three-dimensional equilibrium. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Block, P., Van Mele, T., Rippmann, M., DeJong, M., Ochsendorf, J., Escobedo, M., Escobedo, D.: Armadillo vault - an extreme discrete stone shell. DETAIL 10, 940–942 (2016). Issue on ‘Roof structures’Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolhassani, M., Akbarzadeh, M., Mahnia, M., Taherian, R.: On structural behavior of a funicular concrete polyhedral frame designed by 3D graphic statics. Structures 14, 56–58 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hablicsek, M., Akbarzadeh, M., Guo, Y.: Algebraic 3D graphic statics: reciprocal constructions. Comput.-Aided Des. 108, 30–41 (2019) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, J., Van Mele, T., Block, P.: Form-finding explorations through geometric manipulations of force polyhedrons. In: 2016 Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, September 2016Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masoud, A., Mehrad, M., Ramtin, T., Amir Hossein, T.: Prefab, concrete polyhedral frame: materializing 3D graphic statics. In: Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2017, Interfaces: Architecture . Engineering . Science, Hamburg, Germany (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maxwell, J.C.: On reciprocal figures, frames and diagrams of forces. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 26(1), 1–40 (1870)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McRobie, A.: Maxwell and Rankine reciprocal diagrams via Minkowski sums for 2D and 3D trusses under load. Int. J. Space Struct. 31, 115–134 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore, E.H.: On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 26(9), 385–396 (1920)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nejur, A., Akbarzadeh, M.: Constrained manipulation of polyhedral systems. In: Proceedings of the IASS Symposium 2018, Creativity in Structural Design, 16–20 July 2018. MIT, Boston, USA (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penrose, R.: A generalized inverse for matrices. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 406–413 (1955)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rankine, M.: Principle of the equilibrium of polyhedral frames. Philos. Mag. 27(180), 92 (1864)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rippmann, M., Block, P.: Funicular funnel shells. In: Gengnagel, C., Kilian, A., Nembrini, J., Scheurer, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Design Modeling Symposium Berlin 2013, Berlin, Germany, pp. 75–89, October 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polyhedral Structures Laboratory, Weitzmann School of DesignUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Centre of Symmetry and Deformation, Department of MathematicsUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations