Advertisement

The Pediatric History and Physical Examination

  • Edwin J. Harris
Chapter

Abstract

With some exceptions, the history and physical examinations must be tailored to pediatric patients. The historian is usually not the patient. Specific techniques are discussed to insure reliable information. Also discussed are the chief complaint, past medical history, developmental history, family history, and systems review. The physical examination begins with vital signs, the general physical examination, and the special aspects of the lower extremity physical examination with special emphasis on range of motion evaluation. Tables are provided to cover Apgar scores, developmental milestones, temperature conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit, definition of fever, cranial nerve examination, superficial and deep tendon reflexes, postural reflexes, and lower extremity dermatomes.

Keywords

Pediatric history Pediatric physical examination Pediatric vital signs Orthopedic ranges of motion 

References

  1. 1.
    Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesthesiol. 1953;32:260.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Menachem Y, Butlet JE. Arteriography of the foot in congenital deformities. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974;56A:1625–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greider TD, Gerson P, Donovan MM. Arteriography in clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64A:837–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobbs MB, Gordon JE, Schoenecker PL. Absent posterior tibial artery associated with idiopathic clubfoot. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hootnick DR, Levinsohn EM, Crider RJ, Packard DS. Congenital arterial malformations associated with clubfoot. A report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;167:160–3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katz DA, Albanese EL, Levinsohn EM, Hootnick DR, Packard DS, Grant WD, et al. Pulse color-flow Doppler analysis of arterial deficiency in idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:84–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levinsohn EM, Hootnick DR, Packard DS. Consistent arterial abnormalities associated with a variety of congenital malformations of the lower limb. Invest Radiol. 1991;26:364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Southerland DH. Gait disorders in childhood and adolescence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silfverskiold N. Reduction of the uncrossed two-joints muscles of the leg to one-joint muscles in spastic conditions. Acta Chir Scand. 1923;56:315–30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouchard R, Meeder PJ, Krug F, Libicher M. Evaluation of tibial torsion: comparison of clinical methods and computed tomography. Rofo. 2004;176:127–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clementz BG. Assessment of tibial torsion and rotational deformity with a new fluoroscopic technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;254:199–209.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eckhoff DG, Johnson KK. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of tibial torsion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:42–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Güven M, Akman B, Ünay K, Özturan E, Çakıcı H, Eren A. A new radiographic measurement method for evaluation of tibial torsion: a pilot study in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;46(7):1807–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hudson D, Roger T, Richards J. Ultrasound measurements of torsion in the tibia and femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:138–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stussi E. Tibial torsion calculated by computerized tomography and compared to other methods of measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62:238–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim HD, Lee DS, Eom MJ, Hwang JS, Han NM, Jo GY. Relationship between physical examinations and two-dimensional computed tomographic findings in children with intoeing gait. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(4):491–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muhamad AR, Freitas JM, Bomar JD, Dwek J, Hosalkar HS. CT and MRI lower extremity torsional profile studies: measurement reproducibility. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(5):391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muhamad AR, Freitas JM, Bomar JD, Dwek J, Hosalkar HS. CT and MRI lower extremity torsional profile study: measurement reproducibility. J Child Orthop. 2012;8(6):391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, Groenek K, Weber HM, Larger M. Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shin S, Yoon C, Lee E, Oh M, Kim A, Park M, et al. The availability of radiological measurement of tibial torsion: three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(5):673–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stuberg LT, Temme J, Kaplan P, Clark A, Fuchs R. Measurements of tibial torsion and thigh-foot angle using goniometry and computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;272:208–12.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, Mergo P, Ros PR, Brambs HJ. MR imaging measurements of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(3):791–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Upadhyay SS, O’Neil T, Burwell RG, Moulton A. A new method using medical ultrasound for measuring femoral anteversion (torsion): technique and reliability. An intra-observer and inter-observer study on dried bones from human adults. J Anat. 1987;155:119–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Staheli LT. The prone hip extension test: a method of measuring hip flexion deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;123:12.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryder CT, Crane L. Measuring femoral anteversion: the problem and a method. J Bone Joint Surg. 1953;35-A(2):321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barlow T. Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1962;44:292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ortolani M. Un segno poco noto e sue importanza per la diagnosi precoce di preussssasione congenita dell’anca. Pediatria. 1937;45:129.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lovett RW, Martin EG. Certain aspects of infantile paralysis with a description of a method of muscle testing. JAMA. 1916;66:729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lovett RW. Fatigue and exercise in treatment of infantile paralysis: study of one thousand eight hundred and twenty-six cases. JAMA. 1917;69:168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

  1. Herring JA. Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Hoppenfeld S. Orthopaedic neurology a diagnostic guide to neurologic levels. J. B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia; 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Mosca VS. Principles and management of pediatric foot and ankle deformities and malformations. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2014.Google Scholar
  4. Southerland DH. Gait disorders in childhood and adolescence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Zitelli BJ, Davis HW. Atlas of pediatric physical diagnosis. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Wolfe; 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin J. Harris
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and RehabilitationMaywoodUSA
  2. 2.Rosiland Franklin University of Health Sciences, Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine, Department of Podiatric Surgery and Applied BiomechanicsNorth ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations