Blending Business Strategies with IT in Digital Era

  • İlker MetEmail author
  • Ertuğrul Umut Uysal
  • Esra Orç
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


The alignment of IT management and business is the key factor for the success of enterprises. The IT management must take care and understand the business strategies and proceed in this context for the management of data, application and the infrastructure architecture. The business must also implement methods to transfer the logic behind the strategies, vision, organization, the processes to improve and the functions to develop to the IT management in a context of business architecture. Throughout blending business strategies with IT management, the enterprises can achieve more efficient business and IT operations, better return, reduced risk and complexity; so, the organization becomes more agile among different distribution channels, project and change management is easier and the software development costs will be lower.


  1. Basten, D., & Brons, D. (2012). EA frameworks, modelling and tools. In Strategic Enterprise architecture management–challenges, best practices, and future developments (pp. 201–228).Google Scholar
  2. Davenport, T. H., & Westerman, G. (2018). Why so many high-profile digital transformations fail. Harvard Business Review, 9.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, G. B., & Olson, M. H. (1985). Management information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Giles, S. (2018, September 05). How VUCA is reshaping the business environment, and what it means for innovation. Retrieved January 02, 2019, from
  5. Glaeser, W. Leadership skills & strategies. Vuca World. Retrieved January 02, 2019, from
  6. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14, 1–25.Google Scholar
  7. Lin, S. W., Miller, B., Durand, J., Bleakley, G., Chigani, A., Martin, R. et al. (2017). The industrial internet of things (Volume G1: Reference architecture). Industrial Internet Consortium.Google Scholar
  8. Melão, N., & Pidd, M. (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Information Systems Journal, 10(2), 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Met, I. (2019). Hangi Karar Daha Doğru? Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  10. Met, I., Erkoç, A., & Uysal, E. U. (2018). User experience analysis method for creating new banking services: How to turn your employee feed Back to disruptive gain/Ziraat Bank model. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 23(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  11. Met, I., Kabukçu, D., & Özenç, Ö. (2018). Dönüşüm Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Ziraat Finans Grubu’nda İş Odakli Kurumsal Mimari Yönetişimi. In International Congress of Management Economy and Policy 2018 Spring Proceedings Book.Google Scholar
  12. Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies. Houston: ObjectWatch.Google Scholar
  13. The TOGAF® Standard (2018). Version 9.2, USA: The Open Group, 2005–2018.Google Scholar
  14. Urbaczewski, L., & Mrdalj, S. (2006). A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks. Issues in Information Systems, 7(2), 18–23.Google Scholar
  15. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292 (Published with the permission of John A. Zachman and Zachman International®, Inc.— Scholar
  16. Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Enterprise Architecture Group DirectorateT.C. Ziraat Bank A.ŞAltindagTurkey

Personalised recommendations