Advertisement

Prelude: ‘Animating’ the Narrative in Abstract Comics

  • Paul Fisher Davies
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Comics and Graphic Novels book series (PSCGN)

Abstract

This preliminary chapter approaches the question of comics as meaning-making by exploring comics that challenge the notion of meaning itself: the recently affirmed subgenre of abstract comics. This exploration leads to the groundwork for a pragmatics of comics and raises issues about the nature of reading and the reader’s active approach to creating meanings from comics texts, as well as the nature of abstraction, and how it is realised in the comics text. Abstract comics present challenges for traditional definitions and accounts of graphic narrative, identifying areas in existing theory that a functional model of comics meaning-making may illuminate.

References

  1. Abel, Jessica, and Matt Madden. 2008. Drawing Words and Writing Pictures. New York: First Second.Google Scholar
  2. Arnheim, Rudolf. 2004. Visual Thinking. 35th Anniversary ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baetens, Jan. 2011. ‘Abstraction in Comics’. SubStance 40 (1): 94–113.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2011.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, Neil. 2009. ‘The Visual Linguist: Abstract Comics and Visual Language’. 20 August. http://www.thevisuallinguist.com/2009/08/abstract-comics-and-visual-language.html.
  6. Dennett, Daniel C. 1989. The Intentional Stance. Reprint. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. 1985. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by Alan Bass. Reprint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eisner, Will. 2008a. Comics and Sequential Art: Principles and Practices from the Legendary Cartoonist. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Genette, Gerard. 1983. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Reprinted edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  11. Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1983. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at Method. Translated by Ronald Schleifer, Alan Velie, and D. McDowell. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Groensteen, Thierry. 2009. The System of Comics. Translated by Bart Beaty and Nick Nguyen. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2013. Comics and Narration. Translated by Ann Miller. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. 2005. On Grammar, Volume 1. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, Robert C. 1996. The Art of the Comic Book: An Aesthetic History. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  16. Heider, Fritz, and Marianne Simmel. 1944. ‘An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior’. The American Journal of Psychology 57 (2): 243–59.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kandinsky, Wassily. 1937. Thirty. Oil on Canvas. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.Google Scholar
  18. Kenjirou. 2010. Heider and Simmel (1944) Animation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTNmLt7QX8E.
  19. Leslie, A. M. 1984. ‘Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants’. Perception 13 (3): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCloud, Scott. 1993. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  21. Michotte, A. 1963. The Perception of Causality. Vol. xxii. Oxford, England: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Molotiu, Andrei. 2009. Abstract Comics: The Anthology. Edited by Andrei Molotiu. Seattle: Fantagraphics.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2011. ‘Abstract Form: Sequential Dynamism and Iconostasis in Abstract Comics and Steve Ditko’s Amazing Spider-Man’. In Critical Approaches to Comics: Theories and Methods, edited by Matthew J. Smith and Randy Duncan, 84–100. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Peirce, Charles S. 2011. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Propp, V. 1968. Morphology of the Folk Tale. Edited by Louis A. Wagner. Translated by Laurence Scott. 2nd revised edition. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 2002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. 2nd ed. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Scholl, B.J., and P. Tremoulet. 2000. ‘Perceptual Causality and Animacy’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (8): 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, Matthew J., and Randy Duncan, eds. 2011. Critical Approaches to Comics: Theories and Methods. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. White, Peter A., and Alan Milne. 1997. ‘Phenomenal Causality: Impressions of Pulling in the Visual Perception of Objects in Motion’. The American Journal of Psychology 110 (4): 573–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 1999. ‘Impressions of Enforced Disintegration and Bursting in the Visual Perception of Collision Events’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (4): 499–516.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Fisher Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations