Advertisement

Optimization of the Experimental Set-up for a Turbulent Separated Shear Flow Control by Plasma Actuator Using Genetic Algorithms

  • Nicolas BenardEmail author
  • Jordi Pons-Prats
  • Jacques Périaux
  • Jean-Paul Bonnet
  • Gabriel Bugeda
Chapter
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 52)

Abstract

Since 1947, when Schubauer and Skramstad (J Res: 69–78, 1947 [1]) established the basis of the technology with its revolutionary work about steady state tools and mechanisms for the flow management, the progress of the flow control technology and the development of devices have progressed constantly. Anyway, the applicability of such devices is limited, and only few of them have arrived to the assembly workshop. The problem is that the range of actuation is still limited. Despite their operability limitations, flow control devices are of great interest for the aeronautical industry. The number of projects investigating this technology demonstrates the relevance of in the Fluid Dynamic field. The scientific interest focus not only on the industrial applications and the improvement of the technology, but also on the deep understanding of the physical phenomena associated to the flow separation, turbulence formation associated to the final drag reduction aim. A clear example of what has been mentioned is the EC MARS research project (MARS project, FP7 project number 266326, [2]). Its objectives are aimed to a better understanding of the Reynolds Stress and turbulent flow related to both drag reduction and flow control. The research was carried out through the analysis of several flow control devices and the optimization of the parameters for some of them was an important element of the research. When solving a traditional fluid dynamics optimisation problem numerical flow analysis are used instead of experimental ones due to their lower cost and shorter needed time for evaluation of candidate solutions. Nevertheless, in the particular case of the selected flow control plasma devices the experimental measurement of the performance of each candidate configuration has been much quicker than a numerical analysis. For this reason, the corresponding optimisation problem has been solved by coupling an evolutionary optimization algorithm with an experimental device. This paper discusses the design quality and efficiency gained by this innovative coupling.

Keywords

Turbulent separated shear flow control Surface plasma actuator Experimental optimization Genetic algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially funded by the European Commission (EC), though the Framework Programme 7 (FP7) and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People Republic of China (MIIT), Project # 266326 entitled: “Manipulation of Reynolds Stress for Separation Control and Drag Reduction” (MARS).

References

  1. 1.
    Schubauer GB, Skramstad HK (1947) Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and transition on flat plate. United States Bureau of Standards. J Res, 69–78Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MARS project, FP7 project number 266326. www.cimne.com/mars
  3. 3.
    Benard N, Moreau E (2012) EHD force and electric wind produced by plasma actuators used for airflow control. AIAA paper 3136Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eaton JK, Johnston JP (1981) A review of research on subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J 19Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee DS, Gonzalez LF, Periaux J, Bugeda G (2011) Double shock control bump design optimisation using hybridised evolutionary algorithms. Special Issue J Aerosp Eng 225(10):1175–1192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410011406210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee DS, Morillo C, Bugeda G, Oller S, Onate E (2011) Multilayered composite structure design optimisation using distributed/parallel multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. J Compos Struct.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee DS, Periaux J, Onate E, Gonzalez LF (2011) Advanced computational intelligence system for inverse aeronautical design optimisation. In: International Conference on advanced software engineering (ICASE-11), Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international symposium on parallel and distributed processing with applications workshops, ISPAW 2011—ICASE 2011, SGH 2011, GSDP 2011, Busan, Korea, 26–28 May, 2011, pp 299–304. ISBN 978-1-4577-0524-3.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ispaw.2011.46
  8. 8.
    Lee DS, Periaux J, Gonzalez LF. UAS mission path planning system (MPPS) using hybrid-game coupled to multi-objective optimiser. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. DS-09-1135Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee DS, Gonzalez LF, Periaux J, Srinivas K. Hybrid-game strategies coupled to evolutionary algorithms for robust multidisciplinary design optimization in aerospace engineering. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. TEVC-00213-2009Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Periaux J, Lee DS, Gonzalez LF, Srinivas K (2009) Fast reconstruction of aerodynamic shapes using evolutionary algorithms and virtual nash strategies in a CFD design environment. Special Issue J Comput Appl Math 232(1):61–71. ISSN 0377-0427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Benard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jordi Pons-Prats
    • 2
  • Jacques Périaux
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jean-Paul Bonnet
    • 1
  • Gabriel Bugeda
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut PPRIME - UPR 3346 – CNRS - Université de Poitiers - ISAE/ENSMA - SP2MI Téléport2Futuroscope Chasseneuil CedexFrance
  2. 2.International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE)CastelldefelsSpain
  3. 3.Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations