Advertisement

Transient Process of Separation Control on a NACA0015 Airfoil

  • W. L. Siauw
  • Jean-Paul BonnetEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 52)

Abstract

Experiments concerning the control of flow separation were conducted on a NACA0015 airfoil model with a chord length of 0.35 m at a Reynolds number of 1 million. We analyzed the impact of the transient attachment and separation process on the mean and turbulent fields. To control the flow, angled fluidic vortex generators through 44 orifices were positioned in a single array at a position of 30% from the leading edge of the airfoil. PIV measurement was applied to the vicinity of the wake with the airfoil set at an incidence of 11° with a separation length of 1/3 chord from the trailing edge. Optimization was not performed, although the Cd reduced from 0.0275 to 0.02 and the Cl indicated an improvement of ~17%. Phase-averaged energy distributions were performed in the near wake. When the actuators were impulsively deployed, the data showed the trace of the passage of a large eddy associated to the beginning of the attachment process over the airfoil. It had a strong transient effect on the turbulent energy. When the FVGs were deactivated, a gradual increase in the turbulent energy was observed. Detailed analyses of the mean and fluctuating fields were provided.

Keywords

Unsteady separation control NACA 0015 airfoil Fludic Vortex Generator Transient phenomena Unsteady wake Turbulent fluctuations Turbulent shear stress PIV Hot Wire 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. J. Tensi for the wind tunnel tests and the financial support for FP7/2010-2013, MARS programme.

References

  1. 1.
    Abe H, Segawa T, Matsunuma T, Yoshida H (2000) Management of a longitudinal vortex for separation control. In: Symposium of the National Maritime Research Institute of JapanGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amitay M, Glezer A (2002) Controlled transients of flow reattachment over stalled airfoil. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 25Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darabi A, Wygnanski I (2004a) Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 1. The forced reattachment process. J Fluid Mech 510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darabi A, Wygnanski I (2004b) Active management of naturally separated flow over a solid surface. Part 2. The separation process. J Fluid Mech 510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Debien S, Aubrun S, Mazelier N, Kourta A (2015) Active control separation process over a sharped edge ramp. In: TSFP9, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnston JP, Compton DC (1992) Streamwise vortex production by pitched and skewed jets in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 30(3)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston JP, Nishi M (1990) Vortex generator jets—means for flow separation control. AIAA J 28(6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuethe AM, Chow CY (1986) Foundation of aerodynamics: bases of aerodynamic design, 4th edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathis R, Lebedev A, Collin E, Delville J, Bonnet JP (2009) Experimental study of the transient forced turbulent separation and reattachment on a beveled trailing. Exp Fluids 46Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milanovic IM, Zaman KBMQ (2004) Fluidic dynamics of highly pitched and yawed jets in crossflow. AIAA J 42(5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pauley WP, Eaton JK (1987) Experimental study of the development of longitudinal vortex pairs embedded in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 26(7)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siauw WL (2008) Transient process of separation and attachment over a NACA0015 airfoil by fluidic vortex generators. PhD thesis, University of PoitiersGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siauw WL, Bonnet JP, Tensi J, Noack BR, Cordier L, Cattafesta L (2010) Characterization of typical response in the wake of a NACA0015 under action of fluidic vortex generators. Int J Heat Fluid Flows 31Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woo GTK, Glezer A (2013) Controlled transitory of stall on a pitching airfoil using pulsed actuation. Exp Fluids 54:1507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1507-5

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DSO National LaboratoriesSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Institut PPRIME (CNRS UPR3346, Université de Poitiers, ISAE-ENSMA)PoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations