Sensitivity of Glaciers in Part of the Suru Basin, Western Himalaya to Ongoing Climatic Perturbations

  • Aparna ShuklaEmail author
  • Siddhi Garg
  • Vinit Kumar
  • Manish Mehta
  • Uma Kant Shukla


Temporal and spatial climate variability acts as the major driving force which induces changes in glacier response. However, variation in the glacier behavior could also be introduced due to the influence of non-climatic factors. Therefore, in order to assess the influence of these climatic and non-climatic factors on the response of 15 major glaciers of the Suru basin, western Himalayas, Jammu and Kashmir, a multiparametric study has been carried out involving estimation of dimensional (area and length changes) parameters, snowline altitude (SLA)/accumulation area ratio (AAR) and non-climatic factors (debris cover and topographic). Satellite data from the Landsat series sensors (MSS/TM/ETM+/OLI) during the period 1977–2016 along with the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) Global Digital Elevation Model version-3 (GDEM v-3) constitute the primary datasets used. Results indicate towards an overall negative health of the glaciers with 6.25 ± 0.0012% loss in glacier area and increase in the average retreat rate from 16 ± 3.4 (1977) to 23 ± 3.4 m/y (2016). This glacier degeneration was accompanied by a debris cover increase of ~80% and mean snow line altitude (SLA) upshift of 116 ± 17 m over the span of 39 years. The observed glacier changes exhibit strong correlation with long-term temperature variability (average r2 = 0.481 ± 0.06; maximum r2 = 0.925), however, sensitivity to precipitation trends (average r2 = 0.143 ± 0.07) is not found to be significant. Besides, disparity in glacier response can be partly explained by the spatial variability in meteorological parameters, with glaciers of the Ladakh Range (LR) shrinking (area loss: 9%) and accumulating more debris cover (debris increase: 116%) as compared to those in the Greater Himalayan Range (GHR) (6% and 78%, respectively). However, SLA rise was more pronounced in the GHR glaciers (average of 141 ± 97 m). The differential behavior of glaciers in both the ranges can be attributed partly to the impact of the non-climatic factors such as glacier size, length, maximum elevation and mean slope.



Authors are grateful to the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun for providing all the facilities and support for successful conduction of our research work. Authors thank the two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving the original article and the editorial team for effectively processing the chapter.


  1. Allen TR (1998) Topographic context of glaciers and perennial snowfields, glacier National Park, Montana. Geomorphology 21(3–4):207–216. Scholar
  2. Archer DR, Fowler HJ (2004) Spatial and temporal variations in precipitation in the Upper Indus Basin, global Teleconnections and hydrological implications. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:47–61. Scholar
  3. Basnett S, Kulkarni AV, Bolch T (2013) The influence of debris cover and glacial lakes on the recession of glaciers in Sikkim Himalaya, India. J Glaciol 59:1035–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benn DI, Gulley J, Thompson S, Bolch T, Hands K, Luckman A, Nicholson LI, Quincey D, Toumi R, Wiseman S (2012) Response of debris-covered glaciers in the Mount Everest region to recent warming, and implications for outburst flood hazards. Earth-Sci Rev 114(1–2):156–174. Scholar
  5. Bhambri R, Bolch T, Chaujar RK (2011) Mapping of debris-covered glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data. Int J Remote Sens 32(23):8095–8119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolch T, Buchroithner M, Pieczonka T et al (2008) Planimetric and volumetric glacier changes in the Khumbu Himal, Nepal, since 1962 using Corona, Landsat TM and ASTER data. J Glaciol 54:592–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolch T, Kulkarni A, Kääb A et al (2012) The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science 336:310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chudley TR, Miles ES, Willis IC (2017) Glacier characteristics and retreat between 1991 and 2014 in the Ladakh Range, Jammu and Kashmir. Remote Sens Lett 8(6):518–527. Scholar
  9. Cogley (2016) Glacier shrinkage across High Mountain Asia. Ann Glaciol 57(71):41–49. Scholar
  10. Dimri AP (2013) Interseasonal oscillation associated with the Indian winter monsoon. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(3):1189–1198. Scholar
  11. Garg PK, Shukla A, Tiwari RK et al (2017a) Assessing the status of glaciers in parts of the Chandra basin, Himachal Himalaya: a multiparametric approach. Geomorphology 284:99–114. Scholar
  12. Garg PK, Shukla A, Jasrotia AS (2017b) Influence of topography on glacier changes in the central Himalaya, India. Glob Planet Chang 155:196–212. Scholar
  13. Ghosh S, Pandey AC (2013) Estimating the variation in glacier area over the last 4 decade and recent mass balance fluctuations over the Pensilungpa Glacier, J&K, India. Glob Perspect Geogr 1(4):58–65Google Scholar
  14. Granshaw FD, Fountain AG (2006) Glacier change (1958–1998) in the north cascades national park complex, Washington, USA. J Glaciol 52(177):251–256. Scholar
  15. Guo Z, Wanga N, Kehrwald NM et al (2014) Temporal and spatial changes in Western Himalayan firn line altitudes from 1998 to 2009. Glob Planet Chang 118:97–105. Scholar
  16. Hall DK, Bayr KJ, Schöner W et al (2003) Consideration of the errors inherent in mapping historical glacier positions in Austria from the ground and space (1893–2001). Remote Sens Environ 86:566–577. Scholar
  17. Hanshaw MN, Bookhagen B (2014) Glacial areas, lake areas, and snow lines from 1975 to 2012: status of the Cordillera Vilcanota, including the Quelccaya Ice Cap, northern Central Andes, Peru. Cryosphere 8:359–376. Scholar
  18. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborna TJ et al (2013) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 52(3–4):591–611doi. Scholar
  19. Hewitt K (2005) The Karakoram anomaly? Glacier expansion and the elevation effect, Karakoram Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 25(4):332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Immerzeel WW, Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328:1382–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kääb A, Berthier E, Nuth C et al (2012) Contrasting patterns of early twenty first century glacier mass change in the Himalayas. Nature 488:495–498. Scholar
  22. Kääb A, Treichler D, Nuth C et al (2015) Brief Communication: contending estimates of 2003–2008 glacier mass balance over the Pamir–Karakoram–Himalaya. Cryosphere 9:557–564. Scholar
  23. Kamp U, Byrne M, Bolch T (2011) Glacier fluctuations between 1975 and 2008 in the Greater Himalaya Range of Zanskar, southern Ladakh. J Mt Sci 8:374–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klimes L (2003) Life-forms and clonality of vascular plants along an altitudinal gradient in E Ladakh (NW Himalayas). Basic Appl Ecol 4(4):317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kulkarni AV, Rathore BP, Suja A (2004) Monitoring of glacial mass balance in the Baspa basin using accumulation area ratio method. Curr Sci 86(1):101–106Google Scholar
  26. Mir RA, Majeed Z (2016) Frontal recession of Parkachik glacier between 1971–2015, Zanskar Himalaya using remote sensing and field data. Geocarto Int. Scholar
  27. Negi S (2002) Cold deserts of India. Indus Publishing, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  28. Oerlemans J (1994) Quantifying global warming from the retreat of glaciers. Science 264:243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pandey P, Venkataraman G (2013) Changes in the glaciers of Chandra–Bhaga basin, Himachal Himalaya, India, between 1980 and 2010 measured using remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 34(15):5584–5597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pandey A, Ghosh S, Nathawat MS (2011) Evaluating patterns of temporal glacier changes in greater Himalayan range, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Geocarto Int 26:321–338. Scholar
  31. Paul F, Barrand NE, Baumann S et al (2013) On the accuracy of glacier outlines derivedfrom remote-sensing data. Ann Glaciol 54(63):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pritchard HD (2017) Asia’s glaciers are a regionally important buffer against drought. Nature 545:169–187. Scholar
  33. Rabatel A, Dedieu JP, Vincent C (2005) Using remote-sensing data to determine equilibrium-line altitude and mass-balance time series: validation on three French glaciers,1994–2002. J Glaciol 51(175):539–546. Scholar
  34. Racoviteanu AE, Arnaud Y, Williams MW et al (2008) Decadal changes in glacier parameters in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru, derived from remote sensing. J Glaciol 54(186):499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raina RK, Koul MN (2011) Impact of climatic change on agro-ecological zones of the Suru-Zanskar Valley, Ladakh (Jammu and Kashmir), India. J Ecol Nat Environ 3(13):424–440Google Scholar
  36. Sakai A (2012) Glacial lakes in the Himalayas: a review on formation and expansion process. Glob Environ Res:23–30Google Scholar
  37. Sakai A, Fujita K (2010) Correspondence. Formation conditions of supraglacial lakes on debris-covered glaciers in the Himalaya. J Glaciol 56(195):177–181. Scholar
  38. Scherler D, Bookhagen B, Strecker MR (2011) Spatially variable response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover. Nat Geosci 4(3):156–159. Scholar
  39. Schmidt S, Nusser M (2009) Fluctuations of Raikot glacier during the past 70 years: a case study from the Nanga Parbat massif, northern Pakistan. J Glaciol 55(194):949–959. Scholar
  40. Schmidt S, Nusser M (2017) Changes of high altitude glaciers in the Trans-Himalaya of Ladakh over the past five decades (1969–2016). Geosciences 7(2):27. Scholar
  41. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normalityGoogle Scholar
  42. Shukla A, Qadir J (2016) Differential response of glaciers with varying debris cover ex- tent: evidence from changing glacier parameters. Int J Remote Sens 37(11):2453–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shukla A, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2009) Estimation of debris cover and its temporal variation using optical satellite sensor data: a case study in Chenab basin, Himalaya. J Glaciol 55(191):444–452. Scholar
  44. Singh H (1998) Economy, society and culture: dynamics of change in Ladakh. In: Stellrecht I (ed) Karakoram-Hindu Kush-Himalaya, dynamics of change. Culture area. Karakoram scientific studies 4.2. Cologne, Germany, pp 351–366Google Scholar
  45. Wu Y, He J, Guo Z et al (2014) Limitations in identifying the equilibrium-line altitude from the optical remote-sensing derived snowline in the Tien Shan, China. J Glaciol 60(224):1093–1100. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aparna Shukla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siddhi Garg
    • 1
  • Vinit Kumar
    • 1
  • Manish Mehta
    • 1
  • Uma Kant Shukla
    • 2
  1. 1.Wadia Institute of Himalayan GeologyDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations