# Precision Measurements of the CKM Parameters (Mainly \(\gamma /\phi _{3}\) Measurements)

## Abstract

The CKM angle \(\gamma /\phi _{3}\) is the only one that is accessible with tree level decays in a theoretically clean way such that it provides a precision test of *CP* violation in the standard model. The Belle II experiment is a substantial upgrade of the Belle detector and will operate at the SuperKEKB asymmetric-energy \(e^{+}e^{-}\) collider. The accelerator has already successfully completed the first phase of commissioning in 2016 and first \(e^{+}e^{-}\) collisions in Belle II happened during April 2018. The design luminosity of SuperKEKB is 8 \(\times \) 10\(^{35}\) cm\(^{-2}\)s\(^{-1}\) and the Belle II experiment aims to record 50 ab\(^{-1}\) of data, a factor of 50 more than its predecessor (Belle). The key method to measure \(\phi _{3}\) is through interference between the \(B^- \rightarrow D^0 K^-\) and \(B^- \rightarrow \bar{D^{0}} K^{-}\) decays which occurs if the final state of the charm-meson decay is accessible to both the \(D^0\) and \(\bar{D^{0}}\) mesons. To achieve the best sensitivity, a large variety of *D* and *B* decay modes are required, which is possible at the Belle II experiment as almost any final state can be reconstructed including those with photons. With the ultimate Belle II data sample of 50 ab\(^{-1}\), a determination of \(\phi _{3}\) with a precision of \(1^{\circ }\) or better is foreseen. We explain herein the details of the planned measurement at Belle II.

## Keywords

CKM matrix \(\gamma \) \(\phi _{3}\) Belle II## References

- 1.J. Charles et al., (CKMfitter Group). Eur. Phys. J. C
**41**, 1–131 (2005), arXiv:0406184. updated results and plots http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr - 2.J. Brod, J. Zupan, The ultimate theoretical error on gamma from \(B \rightarrow D K\) decays, arxiv:1308.5663
- 3.M. Gronau, D. London, How to determine all the angles of the unitarity triangle from \(B_{d}^{0} \rightarrow DK_{S}\) and \(B_{s}^{0} \rightarrow D\phi \). Phys. Lett. B
**253**, 483 (1991); M. Gronau, D. Wyler, On determining a weak phase from charged \(B\) decay asymmetries. Phys. Lett. B**265**, 172 (1991)Google Scholar - 4.D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, A. Soni, Enhanced \(CP\) violation with \(B \rightarrow K D^{0}(\bar{D^{0}})\) modes and extraction of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa angle \(\gamma \). Phys. Rev. Lett.
**78**, 3257 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. Zupan, Determining \(\gamma \) using \(B^{\pm } \rightarrow DK^{\pm }\) with multibody \(D\) decays. Phys. Rev. D
**63**, 054018 (2003)Google Scholar - 6.H. Aihara et al., (Belle Collaboration): First measurement of \(\phi _{3}\) with a model-independent Dalitz plot analysis of \(B^{\pm } \rightarrow DK^{\pm }\), \(D \rightarrow K_{S}^{0} \pi ^{+} \pi ^{-}\) decay. Phys. Rev. D
**85**, 112014 (2012)Google Scholar - 7.J.P. Lees et al, Observation of direct \(CP\) violation in the measurement of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa angle \(\gamma \) with \(B^{\pm } \rightarrow D^{(*)}K^{({*})\pm }\) decays. Phys. Rev. D
**87**, 052015 (2013)Google Scholar - 8.The LHCb Collaboration, LHCb-CONF-2018-002Google Scholar
- 9.T. Abe et al., Belle II Technical Design Report, arXiv:1011.0352
- 10.J. Brod, A. Lenz, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, M. Wiebusch, New physics effects in tree-level decays, arXiv:1412.1446; E. Kou et al., The Belle II Physics Book, arXiv:1808.10567