Advertisement

Physical Model and Acquisition Path Analysis: Applicability to Nuclear Disarmament Verification

  • Irmgard NiemeyerEmail author
  • Joshua Rutkowski
  • Gotthard Stein
Chapter
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter describes how a systems based approach to physical model and acquisition path analysis may be used for nuclear disarmament studies by expanding the physical model to include both civilian and military nuclear domains and extending the model to the final stage of weapon deployment. The results show how such an approach may contribute to future treaty design and implementation. The approach shows the principal applicability of this concept to evaluate effectiveness and efficiency of verification activities in countries with commercial and military fuel cycles and activities. This chapter also demonstrates how other verification regimes, specifically biological weapons, may also be evaluated using a systems based approach to acquisition path analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu Z, Morsy S (2001) Development of the physical model. In: Proc. IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards, IAEA-SM-367/13/07, Vienna, 2001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (2002) Safeguards Glossary, 2001 Edition. International Nuclear Verification Series No. 3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) Supplementary Document to the Report on The Conceptualization and Development of Safeguards Implementation at the State Level (GOV/2013/38), GOV/2014/41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Budlong Sylvester KW, Pilat JF, Murphy CL (2011) The Future Use of Pathway Analysis in IAEA Safeguards. In: Proc. INMM/ESARDA Joint Workshop, Aix -en-Provence, France, 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vincze A, Nèmeth A (2014) Effect of State-specific Factors on Acquisition Path Ranking. In: Proc. IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards, IAEA-CN-220, 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Listner C, Niemeyer I, Canty M, Stein G (2016) A strategic model for state compliance verification. Naval Research Logistics 63(3):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    GEN IV International Forum (2006) Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Expert Group of the Generation IV International Forum,“Evaluation Methodology for Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection of Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems, Revision 5,”GEN IV International ForumGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rutkowski J, Canty MJ, Niemeyer I, Stein G, Rezniczek A (2016) Acquisition Path Analysis Modeling Using the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action as a Case Study. In: Proc. 57th Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, July 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Listner C, Canty MJ, Rezniczek A, Niemeyer I, Stein G (2012) A Concept for Handling Acquisition Path Analysis in the Framework of IAEA’s State-level Approach. In: Proc. 53rd Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Listner C, Niemeyer I, Canty MJ, Murphy C, Stein G, Rezniczek A (2015) Acquisition Path Analysis Quantified–Shaping the Success of the IAEA’s State-level Concept. Journal of Nuclear Materials Management 43(4):49–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irmgard Niemeyer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joshua Rutkowski
    • 1
  • Gotthard Stein
    • 2
  1. 1.Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHJülichGermany
  2. 2.ConsultantBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations