Advertisement

Isthmocele

  • Mario Franchini
  • Paolo Casadio
  • Pasquale Florio
  • Giampietro Gubbini
Chapter
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Isthmocele is usually asymptomatic or relates to postmenstrual spotting and dark red or brown discharge, pelvic pain, or infertility. Isthmoplasty should be offered to women with symptoms or if it is causing infertility. Hysteroscopic isthmoplasty appears to be the most popular and less invasive treatment. However, in the absence of randomized trials, the efficacy of different surgical approaches remains to be evaluated.

Keywords

Isthmocele Cesarean scar defect Hysteroscopic resection 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Disclosure statement: The author Giampietro Gubbini is the inventor of “Gubbini system,” hence no royalties.

The authors Mario Franchini, Paolo Casadio, and Pasquale Florio have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive-aged women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an under-recognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(5):562–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Bourne T, Huirne JA. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):372–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menada Valenzano M, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Costantini S, Ragni N. Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation of the low transverse incision after caesarean section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61:216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:90–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antila-Långsjö R, Maenpaa JU, Huhtala H, Tomas E, Staff S. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:1130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jordans IPM, de Leeuw R, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, Vd Voet LF, Huirne JAF. A practical guideline for examining a uterine niche using ultrasonography in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi method amongst European experts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19049. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ludwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Uterine niche by three-dimensional sonohysterography and volumetric quantification: techniques and scoring classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19181. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franchini M, Florio P, Gubbini G. Surgical management of cesarean scar defect in restoring fertility. In: Tinelli A, Alonso PL, Haimovich S, editors. Hysteroscopy. Cham: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernandez C, Mackenna A, Zegers F, Fernández E. Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to cesarean section scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):25–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Lee CL, Kay N. Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):370–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng YL, Li MX, Liang XQ, Li XM. Hysteroscopic treatment of postcesarean scar defect. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, Lin YP, Pan YJ, Horng SG. Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(2):218–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raimondo G, Grifone G, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Scambia G, Masciullo V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesarean induced isthmocele: a prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(2):297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele”in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(2):172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, Shitano Y, Nakashima M, Ametani Y, Nakanoi T. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(9):1363–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Calagna G, Giampaolino P, Paolella F, Bifulco G. Hysteroscopic isthmoplasty: step-by-step technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):338–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muzii L, Domenici L, Lecce F, Di Feliciantonio M, Frantellizzi R, Marchetti C, Monti M, Benedetti Panici P. Clinical outcomes after resectoscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:3341–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gubbini G, Casadio P, Franchini M. Small size resectoscope in isthmocele repair: case report. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2017;7(5):00262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Florio P, Filippeschi M, Moncini I, Marra E, Franchini M, Gubbini G. Hysteroscopic treatment of the cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24:180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iannone P, Nencini G, Bonaccorsi G, Martinello R, Pontrelli G, Scioscia M, Nappi L, Greco P, Scutiero G. Isthmocele: from risk factors to management. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41:44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gubbini G, Centini G, Nascetti D, Marra E, Moncini I, Bruni L, Petraglia F, Florio P. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(2):234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1943–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsuji S, Murakami T, Kimura F, Tanimura S, Kudo M, Shozu M, Narahara H, Sugino N. Management of secondary infertility following cesarean section: report from the Subcommittee of the Reproductive Endocrinology Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(9):1305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Setubal A, Alves J, Osorio F, Guerra A, Fernandes R, Albornoz J, Sidiroupoulou Z. Treatment for uterine isthmocele. A Pouchlike defect at the site of a cesarean section scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laganà AS, Pacheco LA, Tinelli A, Haimovich S, Carugno J, Ghezzi F, Global Congress on Hysteroscopy Scientific Committee. Optimal timing and recommended route of delivery after hysteroscopic management of isthmocele? A consensus statement from the Global Congress on Hysteroscopy Scientific Committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giampietro Gubbini CP, Franchini M, Florio P. Regarding “Optimal timing and recommended route of delivery after hysteroscopic management of isthmocele? A consensus statement from the Global Congress on Hysteroscopy Scientific Committee”. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(6):1111–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Api M, Boza A, Gorgen H, Api O. Should cesarean scar defect be treated laparoscopically? A case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(7):1145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li C, Guo Y, Liu Y, et al. Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic management of uterine defects on previous cesarean delivery scars. J Perinat Med. 2014;42:363–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yalcinkaya TM, Akar ME, Kammire LD, Johnston-MacAnanny EB, Mertz HL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of symptomatic cesarean scar defect: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med. 2011;56(5–6):265–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou J, Yao M, Wang H, Tan W, Chen P, Wang X. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula that resulted in improved postoperative menstruation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):969–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen H, Yao M, Tao J, Wang X. Surgery experience in transvaginal cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) repair. Gynecol Minim Invas Ther. 2016;5:148–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Franchini
    • 1
  • Paolo Casadio
    • 2
  • Pasquale Florio
    • 3
  • Giampietro Gubbini
    • 4
  1. 1.Regional Health Agency of TuscanyFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.U.O.C. Gynecology and Obstetrics San JacopoPistoia, FlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Madre Fortunata Toniolo HospitalBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations