Advertisement

Design and Investigation of Multiple TX/RX FSO Systems Under Different Weather Conditions

  • Shubham MahajanEmail author
  • Davinder Parkash
  • Harjeevan Singh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 597)

Abstract

In the proposed model, effect of number of transmitters and receivers on performance of proposed free-space optical (FSO) communication system is simulated as well as analyzed under various weather conditions like clear, haze and fog. FSO communication provides a strong and efficient method for transmission and reception of information through free channels because of its higher data transfer capacity and inbuilt ability of security. The effect of environmental parameters has been investigated for range of 1 km. The effect of attenuation increases in bad weather conditions affecting the performance of FSO system while designing a system the weather conditions have to be taken care. The effect is to beat the impact of fog attenuation on FSO system by assessment and execution through simulated results of the executed model with respect to Q factor, height of eye, power received and bit error rate. The proposed multiple TX/RX FSO system shows better results as compared to the 1 TX/1 RX system.

Keywords

FSO Optical fiber Optical wireless communication Q-factor and weather conditions 

References

  1. 1.
    Hossain, F., Afroze, Z.: Eliminating the effect of fog attenuation on FSO link by multiple TX/RX system with travelling wave semiconductor optical amplifier. In: 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE 2013), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 19–21 Dec 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaushal, H., Kaddoum, G., Jain, V.K., Kar, S.: Experimental investigation of optimum beam size for FSO uplink. Optics Commun. 400, 106–114 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bloom, S., Korevaar, E., Schuster, J., Willebrand, H.: Understanding the performance of free space optics. J. Opt. Netw. 2, 178–200 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaushal, H., Kaddoum, G.: Optical communication in space: challenges and mitigation techniques. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials 19, 57–96 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ijaz, M., Harris, G., Adebisi, B., Rajbhandari, S., Popoola, W.: Experimental study of the beam wander mitigation in free space optical communications using single input multiple output system (PIMRC). IEEE 28th Ann. Int. Symp. Pers. Indoor Mobile Radio Commun. 978(1), 1–5 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dev, K., Nebuloni, R., Capsoni, C., Fiser, O., Brazda, V.: Estimation of optical attenuation in reduced visibility conditions in different environments across free space optics link. 10th Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag. 11(12), 1708–1713 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rashid, F.U., Semakuwa, S.K.: Performance analysis of free space optical communication under the effect of rain in Arusha Region, Tanzania. Int J Eng Res Technol. 3, 1523 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long, R.K.: Atmospheric attenuation of ruby lasers. Proc. IEEE. 51(5), 859–860 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langer, R.M.: Effects of atmospheric water vapour on near infrared transmission at sea level. In: Report on Signals Corps Contract DA-36–039-SC-723351, J.R.M. Bege Co., Arlington, Mass (1957)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sizum, M., de Fornel, M., Nabousi, M.A.I.: Propagation of optical and infrared waves in the atmosphere. Proc. SPIE 43(02), 319–329 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, I.I., Achour, M.: Free-space links address the last-mile problem, vol. 37 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kruse, P.W. et al.: Elements of Infrared Technology: Generation, Transmission and Detection. Wiley, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, I., Mc Arthur, B., Korevaar, E.: Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communication. Proc. SPIE 4214, 26–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suriza, A.Z., Rafiqul, I.M., Wajdi, A.K., Naji, A.W.: Proposed parameters of specific rain attenuation prediction for free space optics link operating in tropical region. J Atmosp. Solar Terres. Phys. 94, 93–99 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vavoulas, A., Sandalidis, H.G., Varoutas, D.: Weather effects on FSO network connectivity. J. Opt. Comm. Net. 4(10), 734–740 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carbonneau, T.H., Wisely, D.R.: Opportunities and challenges for optical wireless; the competitive advantage of free space telecommunications links in today’s crowded market place. SPIE Conf. Optic. Wirel. Commun. 3232, 119–128 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, I.I., Korevaar, E.: Availability of free space optic (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems. Light pointe Tech report. http://www.opticalaccess.com (2019)
  18. 18.
    Kaushal, H., Kaddoum, G.: Optical communication in space: challenges and mitigation techniques. Commun Surv Tutorials  https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2603518.ieee (2016)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shubham Mahajan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Davinder Parkash
    • 1
  • Harjeevan Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and CommunicationChandigarh UniversityMohaliIndia

Personalised recommendations