Open Source Agriculture: An Alternative Technological Trajectory?

  • Chris Giotitsas
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies book series (PABEP)


Here the two subcases are reviewed under the theories expanded upon in Chap.  5. Again either subcase is reviewed independently first and then comparatively. Analysis takes place on both micro and macro levels. Ultimately, the technological action frame of the movement is compiled that is utilised to provide certain insight on the nature of the technology produced by the movement. Specifically, the impact of values as well as societal factors in the shaping of the technology itself.


Technological action frame Farm Hack L’Atelier Paysan Interpretive flexibility Technical codes 


  1. Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V. and Pazaitis, A. (2019) Peer to Peer: The Commons Manifesto, London: University of Westminster PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callahan, C.W. and Darby, H.M. (2014) “A Mobile Hops Harvester. User-based, Open Source Design and Shared Infrastructure in Emerging Year Agricultural Sector”, ASABE Paper No. 1833187, St. Joseph, MIGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliott, M. (2006) “Stigmergic Collaboration: The Evolution of Group Work”, M/C Journal, 9(2)Google Scholar
  4. Feenberg, A. (2002) Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Gottlieb, B. and Kleiner, D. (2015) Tactics for Economic Dissent, Available at:, accessed 3 March 2018
  6. Smith, A. (2014) “Socially Useful Production”, STEPS Working Paper 58, Brighton: STEPS CentreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Giotitsas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and GovernanceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.P2P LabIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations