How I Researched This

  • Chris Giotitsas
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies book series (PABEP)


This brief chapter expands on the methodology devised for this research project, its specificities and limitations. It also discusses how diverse sets of data were collected, examined and presented. It then sets the blueprint for how the rest of the book is structured according to the two theoretical lenses adopted. Namely, social movement theory and technology studies approaches which are used to synthesise a way to explore different sets of value in alternative technological trajectories.


Research design Embedded case study Data analysis 


  1. Bauwens, M. (2005) “The Political Economy of Peer Production”, CTHEORY, Available at:, accessed 7 September 2008
  2. Brown, M. (2009) Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kloppenburg, J., Lezberg, S., De Master, S., Stevenson, G. and Hendirckson, J. (2000) “Tasting Food, Tasting Sustainability: Defining the Attributes of an Alternative Food System with Competent Ordinary People”, Human Organisation, 59(2), pp. 177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Levidow L. (2007) “European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?”, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 1(1), pp. 19–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Palys, T. and Atchison, C. (2008) Research Decisions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives, Toronto: Thomson NelsonGoogle Scholar
  6. Thorpe, C. (2008) “Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies”, in Hackett, EJ, Amsterdamska, O, Lynch, M, Wajcman, J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 63–82Google Scholar
  7. Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks: SageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Giotitsas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and GovernanceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.P2P LabIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations