Advertisement

Anomaly Detection Based on Automated OMA and Mode Shape Changes: Application on a Historic Arch Bridge

  • Gabriele Marrongelli
  • Carmelo GentileEmail author
  • Antonella Saisi
Conference paper
Part of the Structural Integrity book series (STIN, volume 11)

Abstract

The development of efficient vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) methodologies, capable to timely detecting the onset of anomalies and damages in the structures, is still a challenging task for Civil Engineering community. Most of SHM strategies are based on automated operational modal analysis (OMA, i.e. the extraction of the modal parameters from the signals collected in operational conditions) and often on the monitoring of resonant frequencies. Alternatively, when a well distributed measurement grid is available on the structure, a further strategy for damage assessment should rely on evaluating the mode shape changes. Within this context, the paper is focused on a damage detection strategy based on the variation in time of mode shape (using MAC) and mode complexity (using MPC and/or MPC). The reliability of this approach is exemplified using a short period of monitoring of the San Michele bridge in which the structure was subjected to extreme environmental conditions. The analysis was carried out through a fully automated procedure based on the interpretation of the stabilization diagrams (provided by SSI-Cov technique) and adaptable thresholds in the modal tracking process.

Keywords

Structural Health Monitoring Automated OMA Damage detection Mode shape variation Ancient structure Bridge 

References

  1. 1.
    Peeters, B., De Roeck, G.: One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30(2), 149–171 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magalhães, F., Cunha, Á., Caetano, E.: Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: from automated OMA to damage detection. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28, 212–228 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Döhler, M., Hille, F., Mevel, L., Rücker, W.: Structural health monitoring with statistical methods during progressive damage test of S101 Bridge. Eng. Struct. 69, 183–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gentile, C., Saisi, A.: Continuous dynamic monitoring of a centenary iron bridge for structural modification assessment. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 9(1), 26–41 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., De Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabboi, A., Magalhães, F., Gentile, C., Cunha, Á.: Automated modal identification and tracking: application to an iron arch bridge. Struct. Control Health Monit. 24(1), e1854 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marrongelli, G., Magalhães, F., Gentile, C., Cunha Á.: Automated modal identification in operational conditions using 3D stabilization diagrams. In: Proceedings International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2018, Leuven, pp. 2873–2886 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marrongelli, G., Gentile, C.: A new automated procedure of modal identification in operational conditions. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, Lisbon, vol. 211, 21003 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marrongelli, G., Magalhães, F., Cunha Á.: Automated operational modal analysis of an arch bridge considering the influence of the parametric methods inputs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Dynamic, EURODYN 2017, Rome, pp. 2172–2177 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scionti, M., Lanslots, J.P.: Stabilization diagrams: pole identification using fuzzy clustering technique. Adv. Eng. Softw. 36(11–12), 768–779 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magalhães, F., Cunha, Á., Caetano, E.: Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 316–329 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cabboi, A., Gentile, C., Saisi, A.: Vibration-based SHM of a centenary bridge: a comparative study between two different automated OMA techniques. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Dynamic, EURODYN 2014, Porto, pp. 1461–1468 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Marrongelli
    • 1
  • Carmelo Gentile
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonella Saisi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC)Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations