Advertisement

A Discursively Oriented Conceptualization of Mathematical Problem Solving

  • Boris KoichuEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

This chapter suggests a discursively oriented conceptualization of mathematical problem solving and then illustrates the conceptualization by putting it in use for rethinking results of two past studies on problem solving. In the first study, a practice of developing and using heuristic discourse was facilitated in two eighth-grade classes during a 5-month period. This practice positively affected problem-solving heuristic literacy and aptitudes of those students who were identified as “weak” at the beginning of the intervention. In the second study, effort was made to incorporate aesthetic discourse in problem-solving discussions in three middle-school classes during 8-month period. The effort resulted in gradual change of sociomathematical norms and development of positive attitude to mathematics in one of the participating classes. The chapter concludes by discussion of the promise of the proposed conceptualization for practice.

Keywords

Mathematical problem solving Discursive perspective Cognitive-representational perspective Heuristic strategies Aesthetic appreciation Implications for practice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Michal Tabach, Anna Sfard, and the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that helped me to shape the argument presented in this chapter.

References

  1. Brinkmann, A. (2009). Mathematical beauty and its characteristics. A study of the students` points of view. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(3), 365–380.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, K., James, A., & Montelle, C. (2014). “We definitely wouldn't be able to solve it all by ourselves, but together…”: Group synergy in tertiary students' problem-solving practices. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thought. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(1), 2–10.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, D. (1993). But what do children really think? Discourse analysis and conceptual content in children’s talk. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3–4), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Goldin, G. A. (2009). The affective domain and students` mathematical inventiveness. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 181–194). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Hadamard, J. (1945). The mathematician’s mind: The physiology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hardy, G. H. (1940/1967). A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 23(3), 242–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Conceptual change within dyadic interactions: The dance of conceptual and material agency. Instructional Science, 45(5), 645–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, E. (2011). Development of aesthetic sense in solving mathematical problems. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  14. Kieran, C. (2001). The mathematical discourse of 13-year-old partnered problem solving and its relation to the mathematics that emerges. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 187–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. In E. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Koichu, B. (2014). Reflections on problem solving. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & Mathematics Education: Searching for common ground. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 113–135). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Koichu, B. (2015). Towards a confluence framework of problem solving in educational contexts. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2668–2674). Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague.Google Scholar
  18. Koichu, B. (2016). Response paper: What is reflected in the special issue about the development of the commognitive theory via its implications? Research and Its Consideration in Mathematics Education, 4, 194–208. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  19. Koichu, B. (2018). Mathematical problem solving in choice-affluent environments. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs (pp. 307–324). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Promotion heuristic literacy in a regular mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 33–39.Google Scholar
  21. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2006). Patterns of middle school students’ heuristic behaviors in solving seemingly familiar problems. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 457–464). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.Google Scholar
  22. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2007a). Heuristic literacy development and its relation to mathematical achievements of middle school students. Instructional Science, 35, 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Moore, M. (2007b). The effect of promoting heuristic literacy on the mathematic aptitude of middle-school students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koichu, B., Katz, E., & Berman, A. (2007). What is a beautiful problem? An undergraduate students’ perspective. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 113–120). Seoul, Korea: PME.Google Scholar
  25. Koichu, B., Katz, E., & Berman, A. (2017). Stimulating student aesthetic response to mathematical problems by means of manipulating the extent of surprise. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koichu, B., & Keller, N. (2019). Creating and sustaining online problem-solving forums: Two perspectives. In P. Liljedahl & L. M. Santos Trigo (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Solving: ICME 13 Monograph (pp. 263–287). Cham, Szitzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Koichu, B., & Leron, U. (2015). Proving as problem solving: The role of cognitive decoupling. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krutetskii, V. (1968/1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J.Teller, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lavie, I., Steiner, A., & Sfard, A. (2019). Routines we live by: From ritual to exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 153-176.Google Scholar
  30. Lester, F. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1–2), 245–278.Google Scholar
  31. Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems. Advances and new perspectives (pp. 117–136). Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lester, F. K., & Kehle, P. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 501–517). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. ICME-13 topical surveys. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.Google Scholar
  35. Mason, J. (2010). Attention and intention in learning about teaching through teaching. In R. Leikin & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning through teaching mathematics, mathematics teacher education (Vol. 5, pp. 23–47). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason, J. (2016). Part 1 reaction: problem posing and solving today. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems. Advances and new perspectives (pp. 109–116). Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  39. Palatnik, A., & Koichu, B. (2015). Exploring insight: Focus on shifts of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 9–14.Google Scholar
  40. Pólya, G. (1945/1973). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Presmeg, N. (2016). Commognition as a lens for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson, S. (2016). Problem solving. Perspectives from cognition and neuroscience (2nd ed.). London and New York: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1–2), 9–34.Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right ... if they argue together! Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 461–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sfard, A. (Ed.). (2012). Developing mathematical discourse – Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52(3), 1.Google Scholar
  51. Sfard, A. (2013). Discursive research in mathematics education: Conceptual and methodological issues. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 155–161). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
  52. Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sfard, A., & Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different? Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shotter, J., & Billig, M. (1998). A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In M. M. Bell & M. Gardiner (Eds.), Bakhtin and the human sciences (pp. 13–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetic approaches to teaching children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321.Google Scholar
  58. Tabach, M., & Nachlielli, T. (2016). Special issue: Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. In Studies in mathematics education series: 6. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1, Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). (trans. N. Minick), New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wells, D. (1990). Are these the most beautiful? The Mathematical Intelligencer, 12(3), 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitcombe, A. (1988). Creativity, imagination, beauty. Mathematics in School, 17(2), 13–15.Google Scholar
  64. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (trans. G.E.M. Anscombe). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Zimmermann, B. (2016). Improving of mathematical problem-solving: Some new IDEAS from old resources. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems. Advances and new perspectives (pp. 83–108). Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science TeachingWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations