Future Trends of Emulsifiers and Other Food Ingredients

  • Gerard L. Hasenhuettl


Predicting the future in the food industry is more complex than merely extrapolating trends from the past. Discontinuities in these trends can lead to formulation problems. Food emulsifiers and other ingredients are trending away from chemical names toward more natural compositions. Obtaining comparable texture and flavor attributes is often problematic.

Scientific research in genetics, digestion, absorption, metabolism, food structures, and their interactions are moving toward individualized nutrition. Specific formulations for age groups, gender, as well as physical and mental performance show great opportunities for the future. Population growth and longer life expectancies will be challenges to sustainability. Alternative macronutrients may have to be included in diets and optimized for flavor and texture.


Forecasting Consumer attitudes Saturated fats Trans fats Natural ingredients Prenatal nutrition Mental performance Gender specific nutrition Geriatric nutrition Pet foods  Absorption of nutrients Sustainability 


  1. Boland M et al (2014) Food structure, digestion, and health. Academic Press/Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Adamo P, Whitney C (1996) Eat right 4 your type: the individualized diet solution to staying healthy, living longer & achieving your ideal weight. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Dodds W, Laverdure D (2015) Canine nutrigenomics: the new science of feeding your dog for optimum health. Direct Book Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans M et al (2014) In: Williams P, Phillips G (eds) The changing face of food manufacture: the role of hydrocolloids. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 71–78Google Scholar
  5. Fascetti A, Delaney S (2012) Applied veterinary clinical nutrition. Wiley Blackwell, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Federal Register (2013) Code of Federal Regulations, title 21: food and drug administration, section 584. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Hollins C et al (2013) Nutrition and diet in menopause. Humana Press, Totowa, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hornstein T, Schwein J (2012) Biology of women5th edn. Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeukendurp A, Gleeson M (2009) Sport nutrition2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaput J, Rodriguez R (eds) (2006) Nutritional genomics: discovering the path to personalized nutrition. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Kohlmeier M (2012) Nutrigenetics: applying the science of personal nutrition. AcademicPress, Burlington, VTGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthews M (2015a) Thinner leaner stronger: the simple science of building the ultimate female body2nd edn. Oculus Publishers, Clearwater, FLGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthews M (2015b) Bigger leaner stronger: the simple science of building the ultimate male body2nd edn. Oculus Publishers, Clearwater, FLGoogle Scholar
  14. McClements DJ et al (2015) Boosting the bioavailability of hydrophobic nutrients, vitamins, and nutriceuticals in natural products using excipient emulsions. Food Res Int 88:140–152. Scholar
  15. Morley J, Colberg C (2007) The science of staying young. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Nitzke S et al (2014) Rethinking nutrition: connecting science and practice in early childhood settings. Redleaf Press, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  17. Riby L et al (2012) Nutrition and mental performance: a lifespan perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. United Nations (2015) Department of Social and Economic Affairs.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerard L. Hasenhuettl
    • 1
  1. 1.Cheetahtech International, LLCPort Saint LucieUSA

Personalised recommendations