Advertisement

Zhu Xi’s Ethical Theory: Virtue Ethics Considerations and Kantian Parallels

  • Kirill O. ThompsonEmail author
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 13)

Abstract

Throughout his scholarly career, Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130–1200) pondered the hallowed Confucian project of self-cultivation in quest of moral realization (see Chan 1976, 1987; Schirokauer 1976). On one level, his understanding of this Confucian project has much in common with modern virtue ethics, which is receiving attention in the scholarship; on another level, he made additional philosophical efforts to justify and ramify Confucian cultivation and moral realization. In making these efforts, Zhu Xi in effect sought to set forth the grounds of genuine moral agency, which in turn led to the formation of what I consider to be his distinctive ethical theory, one that bears parallels with that of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) and highlights the salience of Zhu’s contribution to ethical theory. The expression “ethical theory” covers a range of accounts of ethics. In the early twentieth century, ethical theorists in the Anglo-American philosophical tradition examined the meaning and uses of the key terms in moral and ethical discourse, such as “goodness” or “the good,” “right and wrong,” “duty,” “responsibility,” etc. The main approaches they took included intuitionism, emotivism, and prescriptivism. Subsequently, ethical theorists have tried more systematic approaches, such as utilitarianism, pragmaticism, deonotologism, and even Marxism in their efforts to explain the enterprise of ethics. In recent decades, virtue ethics has been touted as a truer to life approach to understanding people’s practical moral reflection and conduct.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present chapter benefitted greatly from the insightful suggestions of the two editors of this volume. James Sellmann also read the manuscript closely and offered useful comments. Finally, the author extends his appreciation to two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. Any remaining mistakes or problems are owing entirely to the author.

References

  1. Ameriks, Karl. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger T. 1981. “A Response to Fingarette on Ideal Authority in the Analects.Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 8: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 1985. “The Common Ground of Self-Cultivation in Classical Confucianism and Taoism,” Tsing-hua Hsueh-Pao 17: 1–2, rpt. in Taoist Resources 1 (1988) 1: 22–55.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, Roger T., and David. L. Hall. 1984. “Getting It Right: On Saving Confucius from the Confucians.” Philosophy East and West 34: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont. 1998. The Analects of Confucius, A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Insightful, culturally, linguistically, and philosophically sensitive approach to the discourses of Confucius.)Google Scholar
  7. Angle, Stephen. C., and Michael Slote, eds. 2013. Virtue Ethics and Confucianism. London: Routledge. (Ground-breaking collection of studies on virtue ethics vis-à-vis Confucian ethics.)Google Scholar
  8. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33.124: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Axinn, Sidney. 1981. “Ambivalence: Kant’s View of Human Nature.” Kant-Studien 72: 169–74.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, Lewis W. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Benton, Robert J. 1980. “Kant’s Categories of Practical Reason as Such.” Kant-Studien 71.1–4: 181–201.Google Scholar
  12. Berthrong, John H. 1976. “Is Chu Hsi a Process Thinker?” Paper presented at a Conference on Whitehead and Chinese Philosophy in Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1998. Concerning Creativity: A Comparison of Whitehead and, Neville, and CHU Hsi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Broadie, Alexander, and Elizabeth M. Pybus. 1975. “Kant’s Concept of ‘Respect.’” Kant-Studien 66.1–4: 58–64.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, Wing-tsit. 1955. “The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jen.” Philosophy East and West 4: 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 1957. “The Neo-Confucian Solution to the Problem of Evil.” In Studies Presented to Hu Shih 胡適 on His Sixty-fifth Birthday, The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 28: 773–91. Reprint, 1969 in C.K.H Chen comp. Neo-Confucianism Etc. Essays by Wing-Tsit Chan, 88–116. Hanover: Oriental Society.Google Scholar
  17. ———, trans. 1963. Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Premier compilation of writings in traditional Chinese philosophy, with long sections on Zhu Xi and the Neo-Confucian movement.)Google Scholar
  18. ———, trans. 1964. “The Evolution of the Neo-Confucian Concept of Li as Principle.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 2: 123–48.Google Scholar
  19. ———, trans. 1967. Reflections on Things at Hand. New York: Columbia University Press. (Zhu Xi’s anthology of essential Northern Song Neo-Confucian writings and discussions on basic Neo-Confucian themes, with his comments.)Google Scholar
  20. ———, trans. 1975. “Chinese and Western Interpretations of Jen (Humanity).” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———, trans. 1976. “Chu Hsi.” In Sung Biographies, edited by Herbert Franke, (1) 282–90. Weisbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  22. ———, trans. 1987. Chu Hsi: Life and Thought. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press of Hong Kong. (Collection of insightful, informative studies of Zhu Xi’s life and thought by a leading twentieth century Chinese philosopher.)Google Scholar
  23. Cheng, Chung-ying. 1979. “Categories of Creativity in Whitehead and Neo-Confucianism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ch’ien, Anne M. 1979. “Hu Chu-jen’s Self-Cultivation as Ritual and Reverence in Everyday Life.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 183–201. (Categorized and illustrates Zhu Xi’s notions of ritual and reverence in everyday practice.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Bary, William T. 1981. Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1991. Learning for One’s Self: Essays on the Individual in Neo-Confucian Thought. New York: Columbia University Press. (Rich, probing account of the inner focus and personal dimension of moral education in Confucianism.)Google Scholar
  27. Denis, Lara, and Oliver Sensen, ed. 2015. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dietrichson, Paul. 1961–1962. “What Does Kant Mean by Acting ‘from Duty’?” Kant-Studien 53: 277–88.Google Scholar
  29. Franke, Herbert, ed. 1976. Sung Biographies, 3 vols. Weisbaden: Franz Steiner. Weisbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  30. Fung, Yu-Lan. 1947. The Spirit of Chinese Philosophy, trans. by E. R. Hughes. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1952–1953. A History of Chinese Philosophy, 2 vols, trans. by Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta-Hsueh. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, Angus C. 1981. Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1986. “What Was New in the Ch’eng–Chu Theory of Human Nature?” In Wing-tsit Chan, ed., CHU Hsi and Neo-Confucianism (138–57). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. (Groundbreaking study of the innovative approach to the moral nature taken in Cheng–Zhu Confucianism, including new light on Zhu Xi’s immanental account of li as pattern.)Google Scholar
  35. Grenberg, Jeanine. 2013. Kant’s Defense of Common Moral Experience: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harbison, Warren G. 1980. “The Good Will.” Kant-Studien 71: 47–59. (A significant study.)Google Scholar
  37. Hospers, John. 1970, Readings in Ethical Theory, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Huang, Yong. 2010. “The Self-Centeredness Objection to Virtue Ethics.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. 84: 651–92. (In-depth examination of a Confucian contribution to virtue ethics.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kant, Immanuel. 1914. Critique of Judgement. 2nd ed, trans. by John H. Bernard. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by Norman K. Smith. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1956. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. by Lewis W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by Lewis W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1960. Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone, trans. by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1963. Lectures on Ethics, trans. by Louis Infield. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1964. The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue, trans. by James W. Ellingron. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  46. Kasoff, Ira E. 1984. The Thought of Chang Tsai (1020–1077). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kierkegaard, Søren. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, ed. and trans. by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, Yung Sik. 2000. The Natural Philosophy of Chu Hsi (1130–1200). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. (Detailed, systematic examination of Zhu Xi’s proto-scientific thought from history of science and philosophy of science perspectives.)Google Scholar
  49. Kupperman, Joel J. 1981. “Confucian Ethics and Weakness of Will.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 8: 1–8.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 1983. The Foundations of Morality. London: George Allen & Unwin. (This study includes salient East Asian contributions to the issues by a senior American philosopher.)Google Scholar
  51. Lazeroff, Allan. 1980. “The Kantian Sublime.” Kant-Studien 71: 202–20.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, Ming-huei (Li, Minghui 李明輝). 1993. “Master Zhu’s Discussions on the Roots of Evil 朱子論惡之根源.” In Chung Tsai-chun 鍾彩鈞, ed., Proceedings of the International Zhu Xi Conference 國際朱子學會議論文集. Taipei 臺北: Zhongyang yanjiuyuan Zhongguo wenzhe yanjiusuo chou bei chu 中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處.Google Scholar
  53. Li, Chenyang, and Franklin Perkins, eds. 2015. Chinese Metaphysics and Its Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Louden, Robert B. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. MacBeath, A. M. 1973. “Kant on Moral Feeling.” Kant-Studien 64: 283–314.Google Scholar
  56. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1966. A Short History of Ethics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1985. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  58. Meerbote, Ralph. 1982. “Wille and Willkür in Kant’s Theory of Action.” In M. S. Gram, ed., Interpreting Kant (69–84). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
  59. Murdoch, Iris. 1985. The Sovereignty of Good. London: ARK Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  60. Needham, Joseph. 1956. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 2, History of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Okada, Takehiko. 1988. “Chu Hsi and Wisdom as Stored and Hidden.” In Wing-tsit Chan, ed., CHU Hsi and Neo-Confucianism (197–211). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  62. Qian, Mu 錢穆, comp. and comm. 1971. New Anthology and Critical Account of Master Zhu 朱子新學案, 5 vols. Taipei 臺北: Sanmin shuju 三民書局. (Indispensible source book of Zhu Xi’s discourses and writings.)Google Scholar
  63. Rošker, Jana S. 2012. Traditional Chinese Thought and the Paradigm of Structure (Li). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Schirokauer, Conrad. 1976. “Chu Hsi’s Political Career: A Study in Ambivalence.” In Arthur F. Wright and Denis C. Twitchett, eds., Confucian Personalities (162–188). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schrader, George. 1975. “The Constitutive Role of Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In W. H. Werkmeister, ed., Reflections on Kant’s Philosophy (65–90). Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar
  66. Silber, John R. 1960. “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion.” In Immanuel Kant, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone, translated, with an introd. and notes, by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. (Insightful, groundbreaking study of the Kant’s mature presentation of his ethical concepts and insights in Religion Within the Limits.)Google Scholar
  67. Stern, Robert. 2017. Kantian Ethics: Value, Agency, and Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sullivan, Roger J. 1983. “The Kantian Model of Moral–Practical Reason.” The Monist 66.1: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thompson, Kirill O. 1988. “Li and Yi as Immanent: Chu Hsi’s Thought in Practical Perspective.” Philosophy East and West 38: 30–46. (Study of Zhu Xi’s basic ethical terms vis-à-vis Kantian parallels.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. ———. 2007. “The Archery of Wisdom in the Stream of Life: “Wisdom” in the Four Books with Zhu Xi’s Reflections” Philosophy East and West 57: 109–24. (Probing inquiry into the practical ethical dimension of “wisdom” in the Four Books and Zhu Xi’s comments and reflections.)Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2015. “Opposition and Complementarity in Zhu Xi’s Thought.” In David Jones and Jinli He, eds., Returning to Zhu Xi: Emerging Patterns within the Supreme Polarity (149–175). Albany: State University of New York Press. (Reveals the implicit unified, complementary structure of Zhu Xi’s ontology and ethics.)Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2016. “Zhu Xi’s Completion of Confucian Humanism.” International Communication of Chinese Culture 3 (Dec. 2016), no. 4: 605–29. (This study concludes with comparisons between Zhu Xi’s humanism and Western humanism, especially Kant’s formulation.)Google Scholar
  73. Tiwand, Justin. 2010. “Confucianism and Virtue Ethics: Still a Fledgling in Chinese and Comparative Philosophy.” Comparative Philosophy 1.2: 55–63. (Early defense of the relevance of virtue ethics to understanding Confucian ethics.)Google Scholar
  74. Tong, Lik Kuen. 1982. “Nature and Feelings: The Meaning of Mentality in Chu Hsi.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 9.1: 1–11. (Early defense of the positive role of the feelings, emotions, in Zhu Xi’s thought.)Google Scholar
  75. Tu, Weiming. 1985. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. Albany: State University New York Press. (Influential collection of essays on moral selfhood in Confucianism.)Google Scholar
  76. Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Book-length study of manifestations of virtue ethics consequentialist ethics in early Chinese philosophical tradition.)Google Scholar
  77. Wade, David. 2003. Li: Dynamic Form in Nature. New York: Walker Books. (Vivid presentation of the traditional Chinese notion of Li (pattern) through photographic images and discussions.)Google Scholar
  78. Wawrytko, Sandra A. 1982. “Confucius and Kant: The Ethics of Respect.” Philosophy East and West 32.3: 237–57. (Early reflective comparison of the notion of “respect” (reverence) in the ethical thought of Confucius and Kant.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  80. Wolff, Robert P. 1973. The Autonomy of Reason. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  81. Xie, Wenyu, Wang Zhihe, and George E. Derfer. 2006. Whitehead and China: Relevance and Relationships. Frankfurt: Verlag.Google Scholar
  82. Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1969a. Reflections on Things at Hand with Collected Commentaries 近思錄集注, comp. by Zhu Xi and Lü Zuqian 呂祖謙, edited by Jiang Yong 江永. Reprint, Sibubeiyao 四部備要 ed.Google Scholar
  83. ———. 1969b. The “Four Books” with Collected Commentaries 四書章句集注. Reprint, Sibu beiyao 四部備要 ed.Google Scholar
  84. ———. 1977. “Complete Works” of Master Zhu 朱子全書, 2 vols., comp. by Li Guangdi. Reprint, Taipei 臺北: Guangxue she yin shu guan 廣學社印書館. Compiled and first printed in 1713.Google Scholar
  85. ———. 1980a. Classified Dialogues of Master Zhu 朱子語類, edited by Li Jingde. Reprint, Taipei 臺北: Hanjing wenhuashiye gongsi 漢京文化事業公司.Google Scholar
  86. ———. 1980b. Collected Literary Works by Master Zhu 朱文公文集. Reprint, Taipei 臺北: Shangwu yinshuguan 商務印書館.Google Scholar
  87. Ziporyn, Brook. 2008. “Form, Principle, Pattern, or Coherence? Li in Chinese Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 31.3: 401–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations