Advertisement

Zhu Xi and the Debate between Internalism and Externalism

  • Shui Chuen LeeEmail author
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP, volume 13)

Abstract

This essay first presents a rather detailed development of the question of internalism and externalism as it was triggered by Bernard Williams’s notion of internal and external reason all the way through Nagel and Korsgaard. Basically I adopt Gunnar Bjornsson’s definition of a conditional internalism in my evaluation of Zhu Xi’s moral philosophy. I argue that ethics as a practical philosophy must contains a theory of moral cultivation and shows how people could become a moral person. This is a good indication of whether a moral philosophy provides an adequate understanding of our moral experience and provides a criterion for our evaluation of the kind of reason it provides for moral judgments and motivation. To cultivate oneself to be a virtuous person and the ideal is a sage is precisely the basic concern of Confucianism. Zhu Xi is no exception and is what he struggles all through his early to mature theory. The central concern is his reflections on moral self-cultivation. This paper presents a brief background of Zhu Xi’s Confucianism and showing how his conception of the way of moral cultivation and hence his framework in general is different from Confucius and Mencius. I then argue that Zhu Xi have a clear conception of moral cultivation that fully satisfy the four criteria proposed by Bjornsson and that it is a conditional internalism. It shows also that Confucianism provides an answer to the question of “why be moral.”

Keywords

Zhu Xi Confucianism Internalism Moral cultivation Gunnar Bjornsson 

References

  1. Björnsson, Gunnar, Fredrik Björklund, Caj Strandberg, John Eriksson, and Ragnar Francén Olinder, ed. 2015. Motivational Internalism. Oxford: University Press. (A collection of papers with a fairly well coverage of recent works on motivational internalism.)Google Scholar
  2. Darwall, Stephen, Allan Gibbard, and Peter Railton. 1992a, January. “Toward Fin de siècle Ethics: Some Trends.” The Philosophical Review 101: 115–89. Reprinted in Darwall, Gibbard, and Railton 1992b, 3–47. (This paper offers an overall view of the development of metaethics for the twentieth century.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———, ed. 1992b. Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. (it is one of the most comprehensive collections of essays on the development and issues of Western ethics for the last twenty years of the twentieth century.)Google Scholar
  4. Finlay, Stephen, and Mark Schroeder. 2017. “Reasons for Action: Internal vs. External.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published on Sept. 4, 2008; substantive revision on Aug 18, 2017. URL.: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasons-internal-external/ (As for “internalism,” this paper is heavily biased to a Humean model in total neglect of other models and it suffers many of those criticism against such a limited sense of internalism.)
  5. Korsgaard, Christine. 1992. “Skepticism about Practical Reason.” In Darwall, Gibbard, and Railton 1992b: 373–387. (A rebuttal of certain criticism of Kant.)Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (This book offers well-documented essays on the problem and development of moral normativity in the West.)Google Scholar
  7. Lee, Shui Chuen 李瑞全. 1993. “Re-exmination of the Basic Pattern of Zhu Xi’s Moral Philosophy 朱子道德學形態之重檢.” In Philosophical Exploration of Contemporary Neo-Confucianism 當代新儒學之哲學開拓 (206–225). Taipei 臺北: Wenjin chubanshe 文津出版社. (This paper gives a comparative study of Zhu Xi and Kant, by comparing Zhu’s concepts of xin and xing with Kant’s concepts of wilhur (volition) and wille (will), and argues that both are homological and have a similar kinds of autonomous agency.)Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. On the Source of Moral Normativity of Confucianism 儒家道德規範根源論. New Taipei 新北: Legion Society 鵝湖月刊社. (It makes a critique of the tri-partition of reason, will and emotion in Western ethics tradition and argues for a unified theory of Confucianism and how it is true to our moral experience.)Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2014, September. “An Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Complex Development of His Early Stage of Moral Cultivation as Shown in Yanping’s Answers to Questions 從《延平答問》分析朱子早期工夫實踐之糾結歷程.” In Journal of Chinese Philosophy and Culture 中國哲學與文化 14: 49–85, first read at the International Conference on Zhu Xi and Song-Ming Confucianism held in the Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2014. (This paper gives details of Zhu’s moral cultivation in his earlier years with an indication of moral cultivation as the key issue of Song–Ming Confucianism.)Google Scholar
  10. Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1969. Xinti yu Xingti 心體與性體, vol. 3. Taipei 臺北: Ching Zhong Book Company 正中書局. (A Revolutionary and insightful analysis and explication of Song–Ming Confucianism.)Google Scholar
  11. Nagel, Thomas. 1992. “From the Possibility of Altruism.” In Darwall, Gibbard, and Railton 1992b: 323–340. (The paper is an excerpt from Possibility of Altruism [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978], a book that offers detailed explication of the problem and the argument of altruism.)Google Scholar
  12. Setiya, Kieran. 2012a. “Introduction: Internal Reasons.” In Setiya 2012b. (A good introduction to the problem and development of internalism and externalism.)Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2012b. Internal Reasons: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (A good collection of papers on internal reasons and the issues of internal and externalism.)Google Scholar
  14. Tang, Junyi 唐君毅. 1975. On the Origin and Development of Chinese Philosophy: Of the Philosophical and Cultural Meaning of Teaching 中國哲學原論:原教篇. Hong Kong 香港: New Asia Research Institute 新亞硏究所. (A comprehensive and insightful explication of the major Song–Ming Confucians with a more or less moral cultivation point of view.)Google Scholar
  15. Williams, Bernard, 1981. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Moral Luck. New York: Cambridge University Press. (A path-breaking paper on the problem of internal and external reasons.)Google Scholar
  16. Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1983. Classified Conversations of Master Zhu 朱子語類. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1984. Annotations on the Four Books 四書章句集注. Taipei 臺北: Legion Society 鵝湖月刊社. (A new and handy copy of the Analects with modern punctuation marks.)Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2002a. Zhuwengung’s [Zhu Xi] Collected Writings 朱文公文集. In vols. 20–25 of 2002b.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2002b. The Complete Works of Master Zhu 朱子全書, Zhu Jeren 朱傑人, Yan Zuozhi 嚴佐之, and Liu Yongxiang 劉永翔, eds. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai guji chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of PhilosophyNational Central UniversityTaoyuanRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations