Advertisement

Optimisation Study of Catalytic Cracking of Refined Rubber Seed Oil for Biogasoline Production Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Haswin Kaur Gurdeep Singh
  • Suzana YusupEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The continuous dependence on the non-renewable fossil fuel could result in diminishing petroleum reserves and environmental degradation in times to come. Early steps to avert this is by developing an alternative fuel of good quality and eco-friendly that is compatible with the existing car engines. Hence, this study evaluates the efficiency of Cu/ZSM-5 catalyst in promoting gasoline range hydrocarbons for the catalytic cracking of refined rubber seed oil. The parametric conditions such as temperature (350–500 ℃) and weight hour space velocity, WHSV (1–4 h−1) were optimised using Response Surface Methodology Design (RSM) in a fixed-bed reactor at atmospheric condition. The aim of the optimisation study was to achieve a balance between productivity, fuel quality and environment security. Therefore, the optimal operating conditions were achieved at temperature of 440 ℃ and WHSV of 1.7 h−1 producing paraffin, isoparaffin and aromatics distribution of 6.42%, 1.67% and 78.1%, respectively, with 91.7% of conversion and 49.67% of gasoline selectivity.

Keywords

Biogasoline Response surface methodology Rubber seed Catalytic cracking Aromatics 

References

  1. Ahmad, M. et al. (2016). Synthesis and activity evaluation of heterometallic nano oxides integrated ZSM-5 catalysts for palm oil cracking to produce biogasoline. Energy Conversion and Management, 119, 352–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.069.
  2. Ameen, M., et al. (2017). Hydroprocessing of rubber seed oil over Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 for the green diesel production. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 61, 1843–1848.Google Scholar
  3. Bokhari, A., et al. (2016). Cleaner production of rubber seed oil methyl ester using a hydrodynamic cavitation: Optimisation and parametric study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boot, M. D. et al. (2017). Impact of fuel molecular structure on auto-ignition behavior—Design rules for future high performance gasolines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 60, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.12.001.
  5. Cheah, K. W. et al. (2018). In-situ hydrogen generation from 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene for catalytic conversion of oleic acid to diesel fuel hydrocarbons: Parametric studies using response surface methodology approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.112.
  6. Chin, B. L. F. et al. (2015). Optimization study of catalytic co-gasification of rubber seed shell and high density polyethylene waste for hydrogen production using response surface methodology. In Advances in bioprocess technology (pp. 209–223). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-17915-5_11.
  7. Dahadha, A. A., Talat, N. & Barakat, S. (2013). Study of the research octane number depression of domestic kerosene-doped automotive gasoline. Advances in Applied Science Research, 4(4), 129–134. Retrieved February 12, 2019, from www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com.
  8. Demirbas, A. et al. (2015). Octane rating of gasoline and octane booster additives. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33(11), 1190–1197. Retrieved February 11, 2019, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10916466.2015.1050506.
  9. Demirbas, A. (2015). Recovery of gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons from waste vegetable oils. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33(19), 1703–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2015.1107848.
  10. Gurdeep Singh, H. K. et al. (2018). Production of gasoline range hydrocarbons from catalytic cracking of linoleic acid over various acidic zeolite catalysts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 1–8. Retrieved October 4, 2018, from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-018-3223-4.
  11. Gurdeep Singh, H. K. et al. (2017). Refining of crude rubber seed oil as a feedstock for biofuel production. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 1011–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.021.
  12. Hassan, S. N. et al. (2015). Biogasoline: An out-of-the-box solution to the food-for-fuel and land-use competitions. Energy Conversion and Management, 89, 349–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.050.
  13. Kurnia, J. C. et al. (2016). Advances in biofuel production from oil palm and palm oil processing wastes: A review. Biofuel Research Journal, 3(1), 332–346. http://www.biofueljournal.com/article_11937.html.
  14. Li, L., et al. (2014). Liquid hydrocarbon fuels from catalytic cracking of rubber seed oil using USY as catalyst. Fuel, 123, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pogaku, R., Anisuzzaman, S. M., & Veera Rao, V. P. R. (2015). Modeling of free fatty acid content in the deodorization process of palm oil refinery using six sigma with response surface methodology. In Advances in bioprocess Technology (pp. 79–95). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved February 12, 2019, from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-17915-5_5.
  16. Pogaku, R., Biswas, T. K. & Abdulla, R. (2013). Low-cost alternative renewable energy bioethanol production from palm oil in Malaysian context. In R. Pogaku & R. H. Sarbatly (Eds.), Advances in biofuels (pp. 97–104). Boston, MA: Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6249-1_7.
  17. Ramya, G., et al. (2015). Application of microporous catalysts in the production of biofuels from non edible vegetable oils and used restaurant oil. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 37, 878–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sang, O. Y. (2010). Biofuel production from catalytic cracking of palm oil. Energy Sources, 25(9), 859–869.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310390221309.
  19. Santos, M. C. et al. (2017). Gasoline-like hydrocarbons by catalytic cracking of soap phase residue of neutralization process of palm oil (Elaeis guineensis Jacq). Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 71, 106–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.11.016.
  20. Shimada, I. et al. (2017). Deoxygenation of triglycerides by catalytic cracking with enhanced hydrogen transfer activity. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(1), 75–86. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03514.
  21. Stauffer, E., Dolan, J. A., & Newman, R. (2007). Flammable and combustible liquids. In Fire debris analysis. Elsevier Science, pp. 199–232. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=qLVqFacaBtoC.
  22. Tamunaidu, P., & Bhatia, S. (2007). Catalytic cracking of palm oil for the production of biofuels: Optimization studies. Bioresource Technology, 98(18), 3593–3601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taufiqurrahmi, N., & Bhatia, S. (2011). Catalytic cracking of edible and non-edible oils for the production of biofuels. Energy & Environmental Science, 4(4), 1087. http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c0ee00460j.
  24. Thomas, A. (1988). Automotive fuels. In Internal combustion engines (pp. 213–270). Elsevier. Retrieved February 12, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780120597901500110.
  25. Twaiq, F. A. A., Bhatia, S., & Zabidi, N. A. (2001). Catalytic cracking of palm oil over zeolite catalysts: Statistical approach. IIUM Engineering Journal, 2(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
  26. Vu, H. X., et al. (2015). Hierarchical ZSM-5 materials for an enhanced formation of gasoline-range hydrocarbons and light olefins in catalytic cracking of triglyceride-rich biomass. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(6), 1773–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vu, X. H., & Armbruster, U. (2018). Catalytic cracking of triglycerides over micro/mesoporous zeolitic composites prepared from ZSM-5 precursors with varying aluminum contents. In Reaction kinetics, mechanisms and catalysis (pp. 1–14).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1415-z.
  28. Wang, Z., & Yu, S. (2016). Production of liquid hydrocarbon fuel from catalytic cracking of rubber seed oil using new mesoporous molecular sieves. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 4(10), 5594–5599. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01441.
  29. Yusup, S. et al. (2013). Biomass conversion to fuel (solid, liquid and gas fuel). In R. Pogaku & R. H. Sarbatly (eds.), Advances in biofuels (pp. 29–39). Boston, MA: Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6249-1_3.
  30. Zheng, Q. et al. (2017). Exploring structural features of USY zeolite in the catalytic cracking of Jatropha Curcas L. seed oil towards higher gasoline/diesel yield and lower CO2 emission. Fuel, 202, 563–571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.073.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASPerakMalaysia

Personalised recommendations