Advertisement

Prototyper: A Virtual Remote Prototyping Space

  • Matthias WenzelEmail author
  • Christoph Meinel
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)

Abstract

Collaborative virtual environment groupware is—despite of notable research efforts over several years—still not common in users’ workplaces. Reasons are high costs of engaging in collaboration next to the loss of information and capabilities that people enjoy in co-located settings. Low-fidelity prototyping is a way for co-located teams to create joint understandings and to gather feedback in early design stages. When it comes to geographically dispersed teams, dedicated tools are required that help to fulfill tasks at hand, while enabling team members as much as possible to apply working modes known from co-located settings. We present a web browser-based collaborative virtual environment that supports the joint real time creation of three-dimensional low-fidelity prototypes. It is a cross-platform application that runs on a multitude of hardware devices. While focusing on usage with virtual reality hardware, users may also freely participate when there are only traditional input and output devices available. The system provides enhanced awareness through visual remote user embodiment combined with spatial audio communication.

References

  1. Agrawal, H., Umapathi, U., Kovacs, R., Frohnhofen, J., Chen, H. T., Mueller, S., & Baudisch, P. (2015). Protopiper: Physically sketching room-sized objects at actual scale. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology—UIST ’15 (pp. 427–436) (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807505.
  2. Babich, N. (2017). Prototyping 101: The difference between Low-Fidelity and high-fidelity prototypes and when to use each. Adobe blog. Accessed April 2018. (November 2017). https://theblog.adobe.com/prototyping-difference-low-fidelity-high-fidelity-prototypes-use/.
  3. Benford, S., Bowers, J., Fahlén, L. E., Greenhalgh, C., & Snowdon, D. (1995). User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’95) (pp. 242–249). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.  https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223935.
  4. Bowman, D. A, & Hodges, L. F. (1997). An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D ’97) (pp 35–38). New York, NY, USA: ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/253284.253301.
  5. Bowman, D. A, & Hodges, L. F. (1999). Formalizing the design, evaluation, and application of interaction techniques for immersive virtual environments. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 10(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
  6. Bowman, D. A., Koller, D., & Hodges, L. F. (1997). Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (pp. 45–52), IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J., Jr., & Poupyrev, I. P. (2004). 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, D. A., McMahan, R. P., & Ragan, E. D. (2012). Questioning naturalism in 3D user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 55(9), 78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2330667.2330687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman, D. A, & Wingrave, C. A. (2001). Design and evaluation of menu systems for immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001 (pp. 149–156). IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2001.913781.
  10. Büscher, M., O’Brien, J., Rodden, T., & Trevor, J. (2001). “He’s behind you”: The experience of presence in shared virtual environments. In Collaborative Virtual Environments: Digital Places and Spaces for Interaction (pp. 77–98). London: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0685-2_5.
  11. Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  12. Buxton, B. 2009. Mediaspace—Meaningspace—Meetingspace. In S. Harrison (Ed.), Media space: 20+ years of mediated life, number 2009 in computer supported cooperative work (pp. 217–231). London: Springer,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-483-6_13.
  13. Clark, H. H., Brennan, S. E., et al. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition 13 (pp. 127–149).Google Scholar
  14. Domingues, C., Davesne, F., Mallem, M., & Otmane, S. (2010). Collaborative 3D interaction in virtual environments: A workflow-based approach. In Virtual reality. InTech.  https://doi.org/10.5772/13013.
  15. Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’92) (pp. 107–114). New York, NY, USA: ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143468.
  16. Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., & Hughes, J. F. (1990). Computer graphics: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S. (1999). The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(3), 243–281 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1145/329693.329696.
  18. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 177–201). Washington: American Psychological Association.  https://doi.org/10.1037/10690-009.
  19. Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S., Blum, R., Dyck, J., Tee, K., & Mcewan, G. (2008). Supporting informal collaboration in shared-workspace groupware. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14, 1411–1434 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-014-09-1411.
  20. Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do Prototypes Prototype? In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 2 (pp. 367–381).Google Scholar
  21. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human–Computer Interaction 18(1), 13–49.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1812_2.
  22. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed work, 137–162.Google Scholar
  23. McMahan, R. P. (2011). Exploring the effects of higher-fidelity display and interaction for virtual reality games. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
  24. Medlej, M. (2013). Human Anatomy Fundamentals: Basic Body Proportions, Accessed April 2018. (November 2013). https://design.tutsplus.com/articles/human-anatomy-fundamentals-basic-body-proportions–vector-18254.
  25. Mine, M. R., Brooks, F.P., Jr., & Sequin, C. H. (1997). Moving objects in space: Exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ’97) (pp. 19–26). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.  https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258747.
  26. Naegeli, C. (2013). Your Smartphone as a 3D Scanner. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich. Accessed April 2018. (December 2013). https://www.ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2013/12/your-smartphone-as-a-3d-scanner.html.
  27. Poppe, E., Brown, R., Recker, J., & Johnson, D. (2013). Improving remote collaborative process modelling using embodiment in 3D virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Ninth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (vol. 143, pp 51–60). (2013) http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2527203.
  28. Stoller-Conrad, J. (2015). New camera chip provides superfine 3-D resolution. In California Institute of Technology (Caltech). Accessed April 2018. (April 2015). https://www.caltech.edu/news/new-camera-chip-provides-superfine-3-d-resolution-46425.
  29. Tang, J. C., (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 143–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A.
  30. Walker, M., Takayama, L., Landay, J. A. (2002). High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 46(5), pp. 661–665) (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120204600513.
  31. Wenzel, M., Klinger, A., & Meinel, C. (2016). Tele-Board Prototyper—distributed 3D modeling in a web-based real-time collaboration system. In 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) (pp. 446–453). Orlando, FL.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cts.2016.0084.
  32. Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: how do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39(5), 813–842.  https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1085.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital EngineeringPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations