Advertisement

Introduction

  • Larry LeiferEmail author
  • Christoph Meinel
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)

Abstract

The Hasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program (HPDTRP) has always put emphasis on investigating the design team in various ways. As our experience with newly emerged instruments like fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) or fNIR (functional Near-Infra-Red) expands and we build on evidence from neuro-economics, neuro-marketing, neuro-engineering, and neuro-science we see a field of neuro-design evolving—a development that complements the broad Design Research landscape. This chapter invites readers to imagine how neuroscience instruments might be brought to bear on measuring and understanding design team performance better.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all authors for sharing their research results in this publication. Our special thanks go to Dr. Sharon Nemeth for her constant support in reviewing the contributions.

References

  1. Adams, J. L. (1974). Conceptual blockbusting. Stanford, CA: Stanford Alumni Association.Google Scholar
  2. Aldaz, G., Shluzas, L. A., Pickham, D., Eris, O., Sadler, J., Joshi, S., et al. (2015). Hands-free image capture, data tagging and transfer using Google Glass: A pilot study for improved wound care management. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121179.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. E., & Clancey, W. J. (2016). Creative engineering: Promoting innovation by thinking differently. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/jb100vs5745 (Includes John Arnold’s original Creative Engineering manuscript from 1959).
  4. Aquino Shluzas, L., Steinert, M., & Leifer, L. (2011). Designing to maximize value for multiple stakeholders: A challenge to med-tech innovation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, August 15–18, 2011, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing (Board of International Research in Design). Basel: Birkhauser.Google Scholar
  6. Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eris, O. (2003). Asking generative design questions: A fundamental cognitive mechanism in design thinking. In Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design (pp. 19–21).Google Scholar
  8. Eris, O. (2004). Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faste, R. (1994). Ambidextrous thinking. In Innovations in mechanical engineering curricula for the 1990s. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Retrieved January 2019 from http://www.fastefoundation.org/publications/ambidextrous_thinking.pdf.
  10. Hawthorne, G., Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Bott, N., Kienitz, E., Liou, N., et al. (2016). Designing a creativity assessment tool for the twenty-first century: Preliminary results and insights from developing a design-thinking based assessment of creative capacity. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (eds.), Design thinking research. Making design thinking foundational (pp. 111–123). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, M. J., Van der Loos, H. M. H. F., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P., & Leifer, L. J. (2001). Designing a robotic stroke therapy device to motivate use of the impaired limb. In M. Mokhtari (Ed.), Proceedings of 7th international conference rehabilitation robotics, ICORR 2001, Integration of assistive technology in the information age (Vol. 9, pp. 123–132), Evry, France. IOS Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jung, M. (2011) Engineering team performance and emotion: Affective interaction dynamics as indicators of design team performance. Ph.D. dissertation, August 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Leifer, L. J. (1969). Characterization of muscle fiber discharge during voluntary isometric contraction of the biceps brachii muscle in man. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, June 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Leifer, L. J., & Meinel C. (2018). Introduction: Reflections on working together—Through and beyond design thining. In: In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (eds.), Design thinking research. Making distinctions: Collaboration vs. cooperation (pp. 1–12). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Mayseless, N., Saggar, M., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. (2018). Creativity in the twenty-first century: The added benefit of training and cooperation. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (eds.), Design thinking research. Making distinctions: Collaboration vs. cooperation (pp. 239–249). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Reiss, A. (2018). Opening of the symposium “Neuroscience and Physiological Perspectives on Design Thinking and Creativity”. Available at https://www.tele-task.de/series/1219.
  18. Reiss, A., Hawthorne, G., & Saggar, M. (2013). Impact and sustainability of creative capacity building. HPDTRP project started 2013—proposal abstract available at: https://hpi.de/dtrp/projekte/projekte-201314/impact-and-sustainability-of-creative-capacity-building.html.
  19. Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Bott, N. T., Kienitz, E., Chien, Y.-H., Hong, D. W.-C., et al. (2017). Changes in brain activation associated with spontaneous improvization and figural creativity after design-thinking-based training: A longitudinal fMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex, 27(7), 3542–3552.Google Scholar
  20. Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Kienitz, E., Bott, N. T., Sun, Z., Hong, D. W. C., et al. (2015). Pictionary-based fMRI paradigm to study the neural correlates of spontaneous improvisation and figural creativity. Scientific Reports, 5, 10894.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saggar, M., Sporns, O., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Bandettini, P. A., Carlsson, G., Glover, G., et al. (2018). Towards a new approach to reveal dynamical organization of the brain using topological data analysis. Nature Communications, 9, 1399.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03664-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sonalkar, N. (2012). A visual representation to characterize moment-to-moment concept generation through interpersonal interactions in engineering design teams. Ph.D. Dissertation, August 2012.Google Scholar
  23. von Thienen, J. P. A. (2013). Kausalniveaus. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers. Available online at: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/8395?locale-attribute=en.
  24. von Thienen, J. P. A. (2017). Neurobiology and design thinking. A podium discussion with Sergio Agnoli, Stefanie Faye Frank, Manish Saggar and Caroline Szymanski. Available at: http://m.tele-task.de/lecture/video/6388.
  25. von Thienen, J. P. A. (2018). Design thinking, the body and creativity: Exploring some bridges. Available at: https://www.tele-task.de/lecture/video/7013.
  26. von Thienen, J. P. A., Clancey, W. J., Corazza, G. E., & Meinel, C. (2017). Theoretical foundations of design thinking. Part I: John E. Arnold’s creative thinking theories. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (eds.), Design thinking research. Making distinctions: Collaboration versus cooperation (pp. 13–40). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. von Thienen, J. P. A., Clancey, W. J., & Meinel, C. (2018). Theoretical foundations of design thinking. Part II: Robert H. McKim’s need-based design theory. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (eds.), Design thinking research. Looking further: Design thinking beyond solution-fixation (pp. 13–38). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. von Thienen, J. P. A., Ford, C., & Meinel, C. (2016). The emergence of design thinking in Californian engineering classes: Four historic concepts worth knowing. In Talk at the MIC conference: From creative brains to creative societies, September 14–16, Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford Center for Design ResearchStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital EngineeringPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations