Advertisement

Inequality and Class Consciousness

  • Héctor CarvachoEmail author
  • Belén Álvarez
Chapter

Abstract

Class consciousness occupied a central role in some classic theories in the social sciences, particularly in sociology. However, these concepts have been mostly overlooked by social psychology. The recent development of the psychology of inequality and social class opens new opportunities to revisit the concept of class consciousness. In this chapter, we provide a conceptual overview of class consciousness highlighting its contemporary relevance, and we discuss how inequality and class consciousness are connected. To explore this connection, we show some preliminary evidence at the social level, showing how class consciousness is lower among rich and egalitarian countries, and at the individual level, showing that for members of the working class, higher levels of class consciousness are connected to lower life satisfaction and worse health-related indicators. We propose a research agenda for social psychology that reconsiders the concept of class consciousness as it might be a fruitful avenue to further explain how certain psychological processes impact the formation and maintenance of social hierarchies.

Keywords

Class consciousness Inequality Social class False consciousness Ideology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (Grant CONICYT/FONDAP/15130009), the Interdisciplinary Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Studies (Grant CONICYT/FONDAP/15110006), and the grant CONICYT/FONDECYT Iniciación/11161074 allocated to Héctor Carvacho. We would like to thank Harry Lewis for his helpful comments on previous versions of this chapter.

References

  1. Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail. Power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of social class. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, P. (2018). Minds make societies: How cognition explains the world humans create. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calhoun, C. (2017). Integrating the social sciences: Area studies, quantitative methods, and problem-oriented research. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. D. S. Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 117–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carvacho, H., Zick, A., Haye, A., González, R., Manzi, J., Kocik, C., & Bertl, M. (2013). On the relation between social class and prejudice: The roles of education, income, and ideological attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers, R. (1949). The psychology of social classes. A study of class consciousness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (COES). (2018). Estudio longitudinal social de Chile, versión panel combinada 2016-2017 (ELSOC_wide_2016_2017_v1.00). [Archivo de datos]. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (COES). www.coes.cl
  8. Côté, S., House, J., & Willer, R. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15838–15843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elgar, F. J., & Aitken, N. (2010). Income inequality, trust and homicide in 33 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 241–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiske, S. T., & Markus, H. R. (Eds.). (2012). Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Frings, D., & Pinto, I. R. (2018). They did it again! Social control responses to repeated incidences of deviance in small groups. Revista de Psicología Social, 33(3), 578–619.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2018.1482055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera, M. C., Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2012). Negative reactions of men to the loss of power in gender relations: Lilith vs. Eve. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4, 17–42.Google Scholar
  17. House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40(2), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., et al. (Eds.). (2014a). World values survey: Round six – country-pooled datafile version. Madrid, Spain: JD Systems Institute. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jspGoogle Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., et al. (Eds.). (2014b). World values survey: All rounds - country-pooled datafile version. Madrid, Spain: JD Systems Institute. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jspGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiménez-Moya, G., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Spears, R., & de Lemus, S. (2017). Collective resistance despite complicity: High identifiers rise above the legitimization of disadvantage by the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(1), 103–124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 313–343). London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohn, M. (1989). Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub.Google Scholar
  28. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Layte, R., & Whelan, C. T. (2014). Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 525–535.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenk, K. (1966). Ideologie, Ideologiekritik und Wissenssoziologie. Munich, Germany: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  31. Lott, B., & Maluso, D. (Eds.). (1995). The social psychology of interpersonal discrimination. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lukács, G. (1923). Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein: Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Berlin, Germany: Malik-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1932). The German ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2002). The communist manifesto. London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1848).Google Scholar
  35. Nishi, A., Shirado, H., Rand, D. G., & Christakis, N. A. (2015). Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature, 526(7573), 426–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Reicher, S. (1996). ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Savage, M. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (2017). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In C. Sibley & F. Barlow (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Phillips, L. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Townsend, S. S. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814–830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, R. H. (1988). Personality in society: Social psychology’s contribution to sociology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2786979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2015a). GINI index (World Bank estimate). World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI.
  50. World Bank. (2015b) GDP, PPP (current international $). World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.pcap.cd

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations