Advertisement

Evaluation of Speech

  • Nancy Pearl SolomonEmail author
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

The presentation of voice and laryngeal functions provides important clues for the diagnosis of a wide variety of speech disorders, but voice is just one component of the speech production system. When a person talks, the overall message is formulated and conveyed by complex integration of movements by the respiratory, phonatory, resonatory, and articulatory subsystems, as well as its prosodic components. This chapter focuses on the evaluation of speech for adults with dysarthria. The speech-language pathologist conducts a thorough, systematic examination of the speech production mechanism including observations at rest and during functional and maximal performance tasks. Auditory perceptual evaluation of speech is rated according to multiple parameters loosely arranged by subsystem. Clusters of speech characteristics, corroborated by results from the physical/functional examination, lead to the differential diagnosis among seven categories of dysarthria. Careful differential diagnosis can support the neurological workup of the patient and can lead to appropriate management plans. In addition to overall severity of the speech impairment, intelligibility is often considered a global rating of speech effectiveness. However, intelligibility is usually better than the overall impression of speech impairment and can grossly underestimate the patient’s disability and difficulties with participation in life’s activities. This chapter provides a glimpse into the complexity and depth of the motor speech evaluation and its implications for functional communication in adults with dysarthria. Each section discusses the rationale and interpretation of assessment procedures, current controversies, and recent innovations.

Keywords

Dysarthria Auditory perceptual assessment Speech production subsystems Respiration Phonation Articulation Resonance Prosody 

Notes

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army/Navy/Air Force, Department of Defense, or US Government.

References

  1. 1.
    American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Dysarthria in Adults n.d. https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Dysarthria-in-Adults/. Accessed 24 June 2019.
  2. 2.
    Dietsch AM, Solomon NP, Sharkey LA, Duffy JR, Strand EA, Clark HM. Perceptual and instrumental assessments of orofacial muscle tone in dysarthric and normal speakers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(7):1127–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones HN, Crisp KD, Asrani P, Sloane R, Kishnani PS. Quantitative assessment of lingual strength in late-onset Pompe disease. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51(5):731–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dworkin JP, Aronson AE, Mulder DW. Tongue force in normals and in dysarthric patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Hear Res. 1980;23(4):828–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Searl J, Knollhoff S, Barohn RJ. Lingual-alveolar contact pressure during speech in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: preliminary findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(4):810–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solomon NP, Makashay MJ, Helou LB, Clark HM. Neurogenic orofacial weakness and speech in adults with dysarthria. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(3):951–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson AM, Goldfine A. Intrasubject reliability of maximum phonation time. J Voice. 2016;30(6):775 e1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joshi A, Watts CR. A comparison of indirect and direct methods for estimating transglottal airflow rate. J Voice. 2018;32(6):655–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solomon NP, Garlitz SJ, Milbrath RL. Respiratory and laryngeal contributions to maximum phonation duration. J Voice. 2000;14(3):331–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lombard L, Solomon NP. Laryngeal diadochokinesis across the adult lifespan. J Voice. 2019;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.04.004.
  12. 12.
    Neel AT, Palmer PM, Sprouls G, Morrison L. Muscle weakness and speech in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCauley RJ, Strand E, Lof GL, Schooling T, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of nonspeech oral motor exercises on speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18(4):343–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Res. 1969;12(2):246–69.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. J Speech Hear Res. 1969;12(3):462–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel R, Connaghan K, Franco D, Edsall E, Forgit D, Olsen L, et al. “The caterpillar”: a novel reading passage for assessment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Enderby P, Palmer R. Frenchay dysarthria assessment. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed.; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robb GL, Lewin JS, Deschler DG, Haughey BH, Brown DH, Langmore SE. Speech and swallowing outcomes in reconstructions of the pharynx and cervical esophagus. Head Neck. 2003;25(3):232–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drummond SS. Dysarthria examination battery. Communication Skill Builders: Tucson; 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanner D, Culberson W. Quick assessment for dysarthria. Academic Communication Associates: Oceanside; 1999.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2013.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ziegler W, Staiger A, Scholderle T, Vogel M. Gauging the auditory dimensions of dysarthric impairment: reliability and construct validity of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (BoDyS). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(6):1516–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Motor Speech Disorders Evaluation (template) n.d. https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/slp/healthcare/AATMotorSpeech.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2019.
  24. 24.
    Johansson K, Seiger A, Forsen M, Holmgren Nilsson J, Hartelius L, Schalling E. Assessment of voice, speech and communication changes associated with cervical spinal cord injury. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(4):761–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dalal K, DiMarco AF. Diaphragmatic pacing in spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(3):619–29, viii.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoit JD, Banzett RB, Lohmeier HL, Hixon TJ, Brown R. Clinical ventilator adjustments that improve speech. Chest. 2003;124(4):1512–21.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hixon TJ, Hoit JD. Evaluation and management of speech breathing disorders: principles and methods. Redington Brown: Tucson; 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Plexico LW, Sandage MJ, Faver KY. Assessment of phonation threshold pressure: a critical review and clinical implications. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20(4):348–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McFarland DH. Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(1):128–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American speech-language-hearing association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):887–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roy N, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Eadie T, Sivasankar MP, Mehta D, Paul D, et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):212–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Verdolini Abbott K, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18(2):124–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Novotny M, Rusz J, Cmejla R, Ruzickova H, Klempir J, Ruzicka E. Hypernasality associated with basal ganglia dysfunction: evidence from Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Peer J. 2016;4:e2530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Theodoros D, Murdoch BE, Stokes PD, Chenery HJ. Hypernasality in dysarthric speakers following severe closed head injury: a perceptual and instrumental analysis. Brain Inj. 1993;7(1):59–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Watterson T, McFarlane SC, Wright DS. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. J Commun Disord. 1993;26(1):13–28.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kataoka R, Michi K, Okabe K, Miura T, Yoshida H. Spectral properties and quantitative evaluation of hypernasality in vowels. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33(1):43–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee AS, Ciocca V, Whitehill TL. Acoustic correlates of hypernasality. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003;17(4–5):259–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Horii Y. An accelerometric approach to nasality measurement: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate J. 1980;17(3):254–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Bodt MS, Hernandez-Diaz HM, Van De Heyning PH. Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. J Commun Disord. 2002;35(3):283–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee J, Hustad KC, Weismer G. Predicting speech intelligibility with a multiple speech subsystems approach in children with cerebral palsy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(5):1666–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lansford KL, Liss JM. Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: speech disorder diagnosis and classification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(1):57–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weismer G, Yunusova Y, Bunton K. Measures to evaluate the effects of DBS on speech production. J Neurolinguistics. 2012;25(4):74–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tu M, Wisler A, Berisha V, Liss JM. The relationship between perceptual disturbances in dysarthric speech and automatic speech recognition performance. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(5):EL416.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shellikeri S, Green JR, Kulkarni M, Rong P, Martino R, Zinman L, et al. Speech movement measures as markers of bulbar disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(5):887–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Perkell JS, Cohen MH, Svirsky MA, Matthies ML, Garabieta I, Jackson MT. Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92(6):3078–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sonies BC, Shawker TH, Hall TE, Gerber LH, Leighton SB. Ultrasonic visualization of tongue motion during speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981;70(3):683–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Patel R. Assessment of prosody. In: Lowit A, Kent RD, editors. Assessment of motor speech disorders. San Diego: Plural; 2011. p. 75–95.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Albert ML, Sparks RW, Helm NA. Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1973;29(2):130–1.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zumbansen A, Peretz I, Hebert S. Melodic intonation therapy: back to basics for future research. Front Neurol. 2014;5:7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shriberg LD, Kwiatkowski J, Rasmussen C. The prosody-voice screening profile. Communication Skill Builders: Tucson; 1990.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kuschmann A, Miller N, Lowit A, Mennen I. Assessment of intonation. In: Lowit A, Kent RD, editors. Assessment of intonation. San Diego: Plural; 2011.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    White L, Liss JM, Dellwo V. Assessment of rhythm. In: Lowit A, Kent RD, editors. Assessment of motor speech disorders. San Diego: Plural; 2011. p. 231–51.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sriranjani R, Umesh S, Reddy MR. Automatic severity assessment of dysarthria using state-specific vectors. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2015;51:99–106.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gurevich N, Scamihorn SL. Speech-language pathologists’ use of intelligibility measures in adults with dysarthria. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(3):873–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stipancic KL, Tjaden K, Wilding G. Comparison of intelligibility measures for adults with Parkinson’s disease, adults with multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(2):230–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weismer G, Jeng JY, Laures JS, Kent RD, Kent JF. Acoustic and intelligibility characteristics of sentence production in neurogenic speech disorders. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2001;53(1):1–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, Hakel M. Speech intelligibility test for windows. Communication Disorders Software: Lincoln; 1996.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bloch S, Tuomainen J. Progressive dysarthria and augmentative and alternative communication in conversation: establishing the reliability of the dysarthria-in-interaction profile. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017;52(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Feenaughty L, Tjaden K, Weinstock-Guttman B, Benedict RHB. Separate and combined influence of cognitive impairment and dysarthria on functional communication in multiple sclerosis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):1051–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Baylor C, Yorkston K, Eadie T, Kim J, Chung H, Amtmann D. The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): item bank calibration and development of a disorder-generic short form. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(4):1190–208.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Walshe M, Peach RK, Miller N. Dysarthria impact profile: development of a scale to measure psychosocial effects. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44(5):693–715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hartelius L, Elmberg M, Holm R, Lovberg AS, Nikolaidis S. Living with dysarthria: evaluation of a self-report questionnaire. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(1):11–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Donovan NJ, Kendall DL, Young ME, Rosenbek JC. The communicative effectiveness survey: preliminary evidence of construct validity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(4):335–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Military Audiology & Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations