Advertisement

Restructuring Humans and Animals

  • Till Frank
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN)

Abstract

Pavlov’s experiments on dogs have been briefly reviewed in Sect.  2.1. In general, experiments as those conducted by Pavlov involve two forces that occur in pairs. The experiments are about how the human and animal brain can be restructured by means of paired forces. In physics a plenitude of systems subjected to two forces have been studied. For example, a ball rolling down on a ramp is a system subjected to two forces. On the one hand, the gravitational force pulls the ball towards the earth. On the other hand, the ramp exerts forces on the ball such that the ball cannot move downwards on a vertical line. As a consequence of the pair of forces (i.e., gravitational force and force of the ramp) acting on the ball, the ball follows the slope of the ramp in a downwards movement. Note that in the literature on the restructuring of human and animal brains by means of two forces the experiments conducted by Pavlov and similar experiments have also been called “classical conditioning” experiments.

References

  1. 5.
    M.C. Allen, G.R. Alexander, Gross motor milestones in preterm infants: correction for degrees of prematurity. J. Pediatr. 116, 955–959 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 18.
    H. Bee, The Developing Child (Haper and Row, New York, 1975)Google Scholar
  3. 27.
    T.A. Blondis, Motor disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 46, 899–913 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 42.
    A.J. Capute, B.K. Shapiro, F.B. Palmer, Normal gross motor development: the influence of race, sex, and socio-economic status. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 27, 635–643 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 46.
    P. Chance, Learning and Behavior (Wadsworth, Belmont, 2008)Google Scholar
  6. 51.
    S.K. Ciccarelli, J.N. White, Psychology. An Exploration (Pearson, New York, 2015)Google Scholar
  7. 62.
    J.M. Delgado-Garcia, A. Gruart, Firing activities of identified posterior inteposirus nucleus neurons during associative learning in behaving cats. Brain Res. Rev. 49, 367–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 94.
    T.D. Frank, Motor development during infancy: a nonlinear physics approach to emergence, multistability, and simulation, in Advances in Psychology Research, ed. by A.M. Columbus, vol. 83, Chap. 9 (Nova Publ., New York, 2011), pp. 143–164Google Scholar
  9. 103.
    T.D. Frank, A nonlinear physics model based on extended synergetics for the flow of infant actions during infant-mother face-to-face communication. Int. J. Sci. World 2, 62–74 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 121.
    T.D. Frank, J. van der Kamp, G.J.P. Savelsbergh, On a multistable dynamic model of behavioral and perceptual infant development. Dev. Psychobiol. 52, 352–371 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 123.
    W.K. Frankenburg, J. Dodds, P. Archer, Denver II Technical Manual (Denver Developmental Materials, Denver, 1990)Google Scholar
  12. 127.
    A. Fuchs, H. Haken, Pattern recognition and associative memory as dynamical processes in a synergetic system. I. Translational invariance, selective attention and decomposition of scene. Biol. Cybern. 60, 17–22 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 157.
    H. Haken, Synergetic Computers and Cognition (Springer, Berlin, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 163.
    N. Herschkowitz, J. Kagan, K. Zilles, Neurobiological bases of behavioral development in the first year. Neuropediatrics 28, 296–306 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 169.
    H.C. Hsu, A. Fogel, Stability and transitions in mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first 6 months: a microhistorical approach. Dev. Psychol. 39, 1061–1082 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 173.
    P. Jena, S. Azad, M.N. Rajeevan, CMIP5 projected changes in the annual cycle of Indian monsoon rainfall. Climate 4, article 4010014 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 206.
    M. Lavelli, A. Fogel, Interdyad differences in early mother-infant face-to-face communication: real-time dynamics and developmental pathways. Dev. Psychol. 49, 2257–2271 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 210.
    J.S. Leversen, M. Haga, H. Sigmundsson, From children to adults: motor performance across the life-span. PLOS One 7, article e38830 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 228.
    R. Malaka, Models of classical conditioning. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 33–83 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 250.
    K.M. Newell, Y.T. Liu, G. Mayer-Kress, A dynamical systems interpretation of epigenetic landscapes for infant motor development. Infant Behav. Dev. 26, 449–472 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 258.
    J.H.C. Palmer, P. Gong, Associative learning of classical conditioning as an emergent property of spatially extended spiking neural circuits with synaptic plasticity. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 8, article 79 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 284.
    N. Schneiderman, I. Fuentes, I. Gormenzano, Acquisition and extinction of the classical conditioned eyelid response in the Albino Rabbit. Science 136, 650–652 (1962)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 288.
    B. Schwartz, Psychology of Learning and Behavior (W.W. Norton, New York, 1989)Google Scholar
  24. 294.
    R.D. Seidler, J.A. Bernard, T.B. Burutolu, B.W. Fling, M.T. Gordon, J.T. Gwin, Y. Kwak, D.B. Lipps, Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional and biochemical effects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 721–733 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 302.
    J.W. Smith, P. Frawley, L. Polissar, Six and twelve month abstinece rates in inpatient alcoholics treated with aversion therapy compared with matched inpatients from a treatment registry. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 15, 862–870 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 317.
    G. Tesauro, Simple neural models of classical conditioning. Biol. Cyb. 55, 187–200 (1986)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 318.
  28. 319.
    E.C. Tolman, Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 320.
    J.A. Tracy, J.K. Thompson, D.J. Krups, R.F. Thompson, Evidence of plasticity in the pontocerebellar conditioned stimulus pathway during classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the rabbit. Behav. Neurosci. 112, 267–285 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 328.
    US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo
  31. 332.
    J.M. Vargas, V.J. Adesso, A comparison of aversion therapies for nailbiting behavior. Behav. Therapy 7, 322–329 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 350.
    WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Motor development study: windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 450, 86–95 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 353.
    P.H. Wolff, Behavioral States and the Expressions of Emotion in Early Infancy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Till Frank
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Psychology and PhysicsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations