Revealing Incidents of Hate Crime on Public Transport: Working with Disabled People
This chapter helps the reader to understand to the process involved in collating the experiences of disabled people who have been victims of hostility. Ground-breaking methods were used to collect data from a group of people who, generally speaking, have been excluded from participating in such research. Interviews and focus groups were the mainstays of the author’s study. Adaptive techniques were utilised to capture the thoughts of people with physical, mental and communication difficulties. Aside from victim data, data were additionally collected from the authorities who oversee UK public transport and the companies which provide it. Finally, the staff members who operate buses and trains were interviewed. These elements were incorporated to provide a rounded understanding of what is being done in the UK to safeguard disabled people from hostility on public transport services. Techniques of analysis, methodological reflection and areas which presented problems are also presented in this chapter.
KeywordsInclusivity Victimisation Research methods Safeguarding Participants
- Cronin, A. (2008). Focus Groups. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A., & Laraine Masters, G. (2002). Proxy Responding for Subjective Well-Being: A Review. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation (Vol. 25, pp. 183–207).Google Scholar
- Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). (2011). Hidden in Plain Sight: Inquiry into Disability-Related Harassment. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2016). Action Against Hate: The UK Government’s Plan for Tackling Hate Crime. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2018). Home Office: Hate Crime Statistics. Online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hate-crime-england-and-wales-2017-to-2018. Accessed 17 Oct 2018.
- King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mason-Bish, H. (2015). Beyond the Silo: Rethinking Hate Crime and Intersectionality. In N. Hall, A. Corb, & P. Giannasi (Eds.), Routledge International Handbooks: Routledge International Handbook on Hate Crime (pp. 24–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mental Capacity Act. (2005). Codes of Practice: Updated 2016, (2016). London: The Stationery Office. Online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Scope. (2018). The Disability Perception Gap. Online at: https://www.scope.org.uk/Scope/media/Documents/Publication%20Directory/Disability-Perception-Gap-report-FINAL.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2018.
- Urquhart, C. (2012). Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar