Common Market Organisation

  • Huib Silvis
  • Roel JongeneelEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies book series (PABEP)


This chapter explains the evolution of the Common Market Organisation (CMO) in agriculture. It starts with the original principles of the European Union’s (EU) agricultural market and price policies and discusses successive reforms of some key CMOs. Market measures have clearly become less important, but they remain an essential part of the policy mix of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The reduction of the scope of classical market measures has been accompanied by a stronger emphasis in the CAP on a regulatory environment to strengthen farmers’ organisational structures. To improve farmers’ and small- and medium-sized businesses’ position in the food supply chain, a new directive has been prepared on unfair trading practices.


  1. Alston, J., and J. James. 2002. The Incidence of Agricultural Policy. Handbook of Agricultural Economics 2B: 1689–1749.Google Scholar
  2. AMTF. 2016. Improving Market Outcomes, Enhancing the Position of Farmers in the Supply Chain. Brussels: Agricultural Markets Task Force, Report November 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Council of the EU. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007; Establishing a Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets and on Specific Provisions for Certain Agricultural Products (Single CMO Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union 299 (1): 1–149.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, S., A. Swinbank, and G. Wilkinson. 1983. The Food and Farm Policies of the European Community. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. OECD. 2002. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: A Positive Reform Agenda. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  6. Ritson, C., and A. Swinbank. 1997. Europe’s Green Money. In The Common Agricultural Policy, ed. C. Ritson and D. Harvey. Wallingford: CAB-International.Google Scholar
  7. Schmitz, A., C.B. Moss, T.G. Schmitz, H.W. Furtan, and H.C. Schmitz. 2010. Agricultural Policy, Agribusiness, and Rent-Seeking Behaviour. University of Toronto Press 38 (2): 291–294.Google Scholar
  8. Smit, A.B., R.A. Jongeneel, H. Prins, J.H. Jager, and W.H.G.J. Hennen. 2017. Impact of Coupled Support for Sugar Beet Growing in the EU: More Sugar Beets and Lower Sugar Beet Price. Wageningen: Wageningen Economic Research, Report 2017–114.Google Scholar
  9. van den Noort, P.C. 2011. European Integration and Agricultural Protection: An Introduction. In International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, ed. M.N. Jovanovic, vol. III. Chapter 9. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Performance and Impact AgrosectorsWageningen Economic ResearchThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations