Advertisement

Task Motivation

  • Judit KormosEmail author
  • James Wilby
Chapter

Abstract

Kormos and Wilby provide an overview of task motivation from both a theoretical and empirical perspective. The chapter begins by defining task motivation in second language acquisition research as being composed of both trait- and state-like characteristics. Following the general definition, six main theories of task motivation from educational psychology are summarized, namely, achievement goals, self-efficacy, expectancy value, intrinsic motivation, flow, and interest. The second half of the chapter reviews studies of task motivation in second language acquisition research and discusses the relationships between task motivation and task characteristics, task performance, social factors, and changes in task motivation over time. In concluding the chapter, Kormos and Wilby make suggestions for future research in this relatively under-researched area of motivation.

References

  1. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boekaerts, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 12. New directions in measures and methods, pp. 77–120). Amsterdam, Netherlands: JAI.Google Scholar
  7. Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 238–251). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2002). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  9. Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 45–71). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behaviour. London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Task motivation: What makes an L2 task engaging? In C. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Essays in honour of Peter Skehan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43–69.Google Scholar
  16. Dörnyei, Z., & Tseng, W.-T. (2009). Motivational processing in interactional tasks. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 117–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  20. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (1992). The present state of interest research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 433–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Jülkunen, K. (1989). Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning and teaching. Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
  28. Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9, 2.Google Scholar
  30. Kormos, J., & Préfontaine, Y. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21, 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maad, M. R. B. (2012). Interaction effect of task demands and individual differences on L2 learners’ perception of task difficulty and motivation. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 1), 1–1),14.Google Scholar
  33. MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 109–138). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  34. Mozgalina, A. (2015). More or less choice? The influence of choice on task motivation and task engagement. System, 49, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Friedman, R. (2012). Achievement goals. In R. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 191–207). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Murphey, T., Falout, J., Fukada, Y., & Fukuda, T. (2012). Group dynamics: Collaborative agency in present communities of imagination. In Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 220–238). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura, J., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poupore, G. (2013). Task motivation in process: A complex systems perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poupore, G. (2014). The influence of content on adult L2 learners’ task motivation: An Interest Theory perspective. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 69–90.Google Scholar
  42. Poupore, G. (2016). Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task motivation and language production. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Renninger, K., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (2015). Interest in mathematics and science learning. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  47. Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1993). Task motivation and mathematics achievement in actual task situations. Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skehan, P. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vohs, K. D., Finkenauer, C., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). The sum of friends’ and lovers’ self-control scores predicts relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 138–145.Google Scholar
  50. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yanguas, Í. (2011). The dynamic nature of motivation during the task: can it be captured?. Innovation in. Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations