Advertisement

Emily: Experiences of Mediation as Denial and ‘Sham’: Mediation as a Problematic Choice

  • Timea Tallodi
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the nuanced analysis of the conflict and two mediations of Emily, an employee of a large public organisation in England. Emily has a serious medical condition and since her return to work following sick leave has been in conflict with two employees, Kate and Tracy. The analysis explicates Emily’s experience of conflict as ‘being vulnerable and unprotected in the face of threats’. A powerful portrait of Emily’s perceptions of bullying is presented involving her experience of conflict that ‘destroys’ her self-esteem and self-efficacy. Emily’s marked negative experience of mediation is explored: her subjective perceptions of a ‘sham’ process and the pressures to ‘give in’ are highlighted. The analysis raises a number of questions including the importance of a thorough intake conversation in determining whether a case is apt for mediation.

References

  1. Bagshaw, D., Adams, V., Zannettino, L., & Wendt, S. (2015). Elder mediation and the financial abuse of older people by a family member. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 32(4), 443–480.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballard, R. H., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. G., & D’Onofrio, B. (2011). Factors affecting the outcome of divorce and paternity mediations. Family Court Review, 49, 16–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01350.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, C. J. A., & Raghavan, C. (2010). Intimate partner abuse screening in custody mediation: The importance of assessing coercive control. Family Court Review, 48(3), 555–565.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01329.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, M. D., & Hughes, S. S. (2005). The art of mediation. Notre Dame, France: NITA.Google Scholar
  5. Björkvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behaviour, 20, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boon, A., Urwin, P., & Karuk, W. (2011). What difference does it make? Facilitative judicial mediation of discrimination cases in employment tribunals. Industrial Law Journal, 40, 45–81.  https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwq030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict (revised edn.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derycke, H., Vlerick, P., Burnay, N., Decleire, C., D’Hoore, W., Hasselhorn, H. M., et al. (2010). Impact of the effort-reward imbalance model on intent to leave among Belgian health care workers: A prospective study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 879–893.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doherty, N., & Guyler, M. (2008). The essential guide to workplace mediation and conflict resolution: Rebuilding workplace relationships. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  11. Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower., 20(2), 16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 1–30). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2003). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 127–145). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  14. Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M., & Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  16. Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2010). A relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 426–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00813.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huston, T. L., & Robins, E. (1982). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 901–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, M. (2011). Practice note: Is mediation suitable for complaints of workplace bullying? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 29, 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, D. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organisation: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge and counterproductive work behaviours. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 30, 525–542.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2011). Social psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  22. Larsen, R., & Thorpe, C. (2006). Elder mediation: Optimizing major family transitions. Marq. Elder’s Advisor, 7(2), 293–312.Google Scholar
  23. Latreille, P. (2011). Mediation: A thematic review of ACAS/CIPD evidence (ACAS Research Paper, 13/11). London: ACAS.Google Scholar
  24. Lazare, A. (1995, January–February). Go ahead, say you’re sorry. Psychology Today, p. 40.Google Scholar
  25. Linabary, J. R., Krishna, A., & Connaughton, S. L. (2017). The conflict family: Storytelling as an activity and a method for locally led, community-based peacebuilding. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 34(4), 431–453.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, J. (2015). A strengths approach to elder mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 32(4), 481–498.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miell, D., & Dallos, R. (1996). Introduction: Exploring interactions and relationships. In D. Miell & R. Dallos (Eds.), Social interactions and personal relationships (pp. 1–23). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 459–470.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saam, J. N. (2010). Interventions in workplace bullying: A multilevel approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saundry, R., Bennett, T., & Wibberley, G. (2013). Workplace mediation: The participant experience (ACAS Research Paper 02/13). London: ACAS.Google Scholar
  31. Saundry, R., Latreille, P. L., Dickens, L., Irvine, C., Teague, P., Urwin, P., et al. (2014). Reframing resolution: Managing conflict and resolving individual employment disputes in the contemporary workplace (ACAS Policy Discussion Paper). ACAS: London.Google Scholar
  32. Schneider, C. D. (2000). What it means to be sorry: The power of apology in mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 17, 265–280.  https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900170305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist, J. (1991). Contributions of sociology to the prediction of heart disease and their implications for public health. European Journal of Public Health, 1, 10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stulberg, J. B. (1997). Facilitative versus evaluative mediator orientations: Piercing the grid lock. Florida State University Law Review, 24, 985–1005.Google Scholar
  35. Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. The Canadian Centre for Elder Law. (2012). Elder and guardianship mediation (CCEL Research Paper No. 5). Vancouver, BC, Canada: British Columbia Law Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Tishler, C. L., Bartholomae, S., Katz, B. L., & Landry-Meyer, L. (2004). Is domestic violence relevant? An exploratory analysis of couples referred for mediation in family court. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(9), 1042–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504268003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timea Tallodi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations