Advertisement

Conclusion: Well That Was Stupid

  • Aaron KernerEmail author
  • Julian Hoxter
Chapter

Abstract

The authors open their volume Theorizing Stupid Media with a brief discussion of Zack Snyder’s 2011 film Sucker Punch, and they elect to book-end the volume by returning to it. As a concluding exercise, the authors explore the different ways in which Snyder’s film might be considered stupid. Sucker Punch is unapologetic in its staging of spectacles: adapting the Hollywood vernacular, as well as the gleeful exhibition of fetishistic imagery. Sucker Punch also draws on a menagerie of different genres (or forms): the music video, chambara/samurai movie, war movie, fantasy film, western heist movie set in a science fiction world. It is unclear about whose story is being told, and this introduces an element of narrative dissonance. All told Sucker Punch is exemplarily stupid.

References

  1. Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. London: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Bustillos, Maria. “It’s Adventure Time.” The Awl, April 15, 2014. Accessed November 10, 2018. http://theholenearthecenteroftheworld.com/.
  3. Gunning, Tom. “The Cinema of Attraction[s]: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, ed. Wanda Strauven, 381–388. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, Peter. “Pornography Drives Technology: Why Not to Censor the Internet.” Federal Communications Law Journal vol. 49, no. 1 (1996): 217–226.Google Scholar
  5. Kemal, Salim. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory: An Introduction, Second Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Komiya, Megumi and Litman, Barry. “The Economics of the Prerecorded Videocassette Industry.” In Social and Cultural Aspects of VCR Use, ed. Julia R. Dobrow, 25–44. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. Moralde, Oscar. “Sucker Punch and the Fetishized Image.” Slant, April 5, 2011. Accessed November 10, 2018. https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/sucker-punch-and-the-fetishized-image/.
  8. Musil, Robert. “On Stupidity.” In Precision and Soul: Essays and Addresses, ed. and translated by Burton Pike and David S. Luft, 268–286. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Plantinga, Carl. Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Ronell, Avital. Stupidity. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Sergeant, Alexander. “Zack Snyder’s Impossible Gaze: The Fantasy of ‘Looked-at-ness’ Manifested in Sucker Punch (2011).” In Sensational Pleasures in Cinema, Literature and Visual Culture: The Phallic Eye, eds. Gilad Padva and Nurit Buchweitz, 127–139. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaefer, Eric. “The Obscene Seen: Spectacle and Transgression in Postwar Burlesque Films.” Cinema Journal vol. 36, no. 2 (Winter, 1997): 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaviro, Steven. Post-Cinematic Affect. London: British Film Institute, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Stork, Matthias. “CHAOS CINEMA: The decline and fall of action filmmaking.” IndieWire, August 22, 2011. Accessed November 10, 2018. http://www.indiewire.com/2011/08/video-essay-chaos-cinema-the-decline-and-fall-of-action-filmmaking-132832/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CinemaSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations